Hi Kevin;
I think that is a personal decision. Purists would say to use the first
(chronologically)
name. In my database, I use the name where the records would be located, then
explain the name changes in the text part that is attached to the record.
Best wishes,
Dana
At 01:05 PM 1/5/2004, you wrote:
>All,
>
>In cleaning up my places, I've been struggling with how to enter / use these
>two townships based on the following information:
>
>Lycoming Township was originally formed in 1785 as a part of N
Does anyone feel confident enough about early 1700s naming habits to remark
on whether Jonas and John can ever be interchangeable, or were they as
different as John and Joseph?
The group I am dealing with (early Swedes) used Johan/Johannes for John in
the 1600s. I think Jonas is a bona fide separate name, but cannot be sure as I
have not a found a family with two separate sons with those two separate names,
which would clarify matters.
This is a crucial bit of information for me in narrowing down
Hi Diana,
The BLM GLO site states that the 1818 tract was on authority of the Scrip Warrant Act of 1812. This promised 160 acres to privates and NCOs who enlisted in regiments raised by Congress and served for 5 years, unless discharged sooner or killed.
The act of 1850 extended bounty land to officers and enlisted men WHO HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED LAND and who had served in any war since 1790, including Indian Wars. Different amounts of land for different lengths of service, the minimum service being
Bob:
I duplicated your efforts and found this: On Ancestry, you will note that it
says at the top of the census page for township "Civil District 4." Also,
you will note that there is a stamped page number at the top: "88". In my
experience with Heritage Quest census indexes, that they use that stamped number
rather than the handwritten number to the far right. (Although not always!)
So, then I went to the appropiate HQ census and chose "District 4" which
takes me to page 80a. I type in 88a in
I found a family that I was looking for on the 1920 Ancestry Census
Index. I only knew the son's name and the county, Jefferson County TN,
he was from. He, Clifford W Patton, was not in the Ancestry index. I
looked for all Pattons in Jefferson County and only two came up, both
William. I looked at the younger and when I looked at the image there
was Clifford age 20. However the image was very poor and even with best
quality I could not make out the mother's name or that of some of the 8
children.
So
GeneaPro is now in the planning phase of very ambitious genealogical
software project. The project starts with a commitment to be truly
cross-platform, OS independent (Windows, Linux, Unix, etc.), multi-user, and
Open Source. And to add to the challenge, implementing the rigorous and
complex GenTech Genealogical Data Model, a feat which has not yet been
performed by any commercial developers or open source effort.
While planning and design has just begun, some general technical directions
and requirements
Dana,
Thanks, that seems to be the prevailing opinion. And I believe that is what
I will do, because that is where the event actually took place, which is the
style I have been working towards. My notes are good so there should be no
confusion at a later date.
Sincerely,
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Dana Edgecomb [mailto:nighthawk@psouth.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:21 PM
To: ADVANCED-RESEARCH-L@rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [ADVANRES] Township confusion - Old Lycoming Township /
Lyco
Because I had such a good response with my bounty land question yesterday, I
figured I could ask about a copy of a deed I got a few years ago that has me
pondering why it was recorded years after the land was sold.
The Deed was signed by my ancestor (the grantor) April 30, 1835. The Clerk
also affixes his private seal on that date "there being, as yet no official
seal provided".
My ancestor died in the next five years and I don't when or where and am sure
hoping to find out one day.
So, I wonder
Lynxir@aol.com wrote:
>
> Because I had such a good response with my bounty land question yesterday, I
> figured I could ask about a copy of a deed I got a few years ago that has me
> pondering why it was recorded years after the land was sold.
>
> The Deed was signed by my ancestor (the grantor) April 30, 1835. The Clerk
> also affixes his private seal on that date "there being, as yet no official
> seal provided".
>
> My ancestor died in the next five years and I don't when or where and am sure
> hop
All,
In cleaning up my places, I've been struggling with how to enter / use these
two townships based on the following information:
Lycoming Township was originally formed in 1785 as a part of Northumberland
County. Lycoming County was formed from Northumberland County in 1795,
which included the township of Lycoming. In 1858 Lycoming Township was
split, to form Old Lycoming Township and Lycoming Township. Although I have
seen reference to Old Lycoming township being formed in 1785, so it appears
that
I always use the place name under which you would find the information so
- it would be different for the two different census - in my notes so I
don't get confused or they moved - I reference nka and the current
location.
Barbara Ferrell
Cuyahoga Falls Oh
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Thank you for the education about the deed recording date. I really
appreciate it. I now understand that this date may have something to do with what is
going on with the grantees or their heirs, but has absolutely nothing to do
with the grantor.
Thanks again!
Diana
I have a mystery concerning the use of 2 different surnames by the same woman
that I would like some advice about.
Elias David RUDD had a wife named Fannie. She was born between 1785-95
probably in Beaufort Co., SC. She died in 1855 in Gadsden Co., FL. Previous
researchers of this RUDD family line have noted her name as Frances BRELAND TANNER.
I've come to question this name as being her actual name since I find no
document or evidence that relates her name in this manner.
However, I have a copy of
Hello,
my name is Marcel Lesaar and I try to find more inforamtion about my family
members, who went from Germany to the USA.
Now I have the following problem: One of my family members died in 1935 in
Detroit. She was born in Europe. I have the death certificate but there is
now place of birth mentioned. Can anybodey help me and give me a hint where
how I can get the information in which town she was born?
Thanks for your help.
Bye.
Marcel
Hello Marcel,
Since I do not know what data you have found about your relative, my
apologies if some of my suggestions are for approaches you have already
tried or you do not have the necessary information to try.
When did she emigrate? Lists of passenger arriving at U.S. ports from the
1840s through 1897 can be found in volumes called Germans to America. Check
this site for sources having them.
http://www.genealogienetz.de/misc/emig/gta-holdings.html
Have you checked the census records for the years fo
You may want to check when the grantee sold the land in question. One of my
ancestors bought and sold quite a bit of land, but he never recorded the deed
showing his purchase. This was done when he was about the transfer the
property to someone else. The clerk always showed that it was "recorded at the
request of" the new grantee. This was in Blaine and Gooding County, Idaho. I am
told this happened quite a bit within families also, if the transfer was due
to primogeniture. (Oldest son obtained
I have a question regarding land records. First of all, at the BLM Web
site, I found a James Mullica purchased or received land in Hancock Co., Ilinois
July 18, 1818 based on military service (War of 1812). This is not an
ancestor, but a surname I am researching and this land record was a mystery to me
because there were never Mullicas in that area.
So, I ordered the Bounty Land Application from the National Archives. It
turns out, those papers are dated 1864 and James was applying for bount
MULLICA JAMES SE 35 05N 08W 4 07/08/1818
HANCOCK
County Clerk should have an Index of sales, by Granter and Grantee, from
that you can get a copy of the deed.
Also check http://www.ilsos.net/departments/archives/data_lan.html and see
if Illinois records match NARA
The other part of the site has marriage records
http://www.ilsos.net/departments/archives/databases.html
Two Mullica marriages one in Fulton County, one in McLean County.
Kent
----- Original Message -----
From:
You don't mention where the land was located, but not all places had daily
access to "officials" to record such things. Someone local kept track of
transactions until the proper authorities came around from larger towns
(several times a year to once a month) to make an "official" record of the
transaction.
In some places, the U.S. government didn't really own the land they were
giving away or selling. 1837 is the year of the Cherokee removal, so if you
are talking about property "owned" prior to that, it's