Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:berkshire +(+date:jul +date:2001)
Viewing 1-25 of 389 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | Next
1. Re: Long Wittenham Surname Search [1]
Aye, it's all good stuff. Maybe not belonging properly to a genealogical website, but all good stuff nonetheless. Meanwhile, because we think we have a connection to the Eystons of East Hendred, there's a possibility that I may be descended from More. So I'd like to be called Your Holiness, please. You are a fascinating and erudite woman. I am truly grateful for all the work you put in on the list. I also think you have the diplomatic skills of a Talleyrand, no matter what the brigade of malcontents says.
2. Re: virus found in attachment from Bernard Hunt [1]
Yes. This means there WAS a virus. I got it from a correspondent on the SUFFOLK-LIST. A reminder: DO NOT OPEN ATTACHMENTS FROM PEOPLE YOU DO NOT KNOW. AND DO NOT OPEN ATTACHMENTS UNLESS YOU KNOW THEIR CONTENTS BEFOREHAND. It is sad that these things are happening. Someone's idea of a joke causes untold problems. Bernard Hunt On Sat, 21 July 2001, MReed94439@aol.com wrote: > > What does this mean. Is there a virus or is there not? > > Margaret > > > ==== BERKSHIRE Mailing List ==== > Internet Lib
3. Re: virus found in attachment from Bernard Hunt [1]
Doreen: Please note the explanation I sent out to the list earlier today. There IS a virus. DO NOT OPEN attachments from anyone you do not know. I wish the devil this hadn't happened. It is causing no end of trouble. But I picked the virus up quite innocently by opening an e-mail in violation of my own commandment. regards On Sat, 21 July 2001, "Doreen Davidson" wrote: > > Hi Margaret > > My ISP picked up that there was a virus in this attachment before it ever > got to me. They removed the file and
4. Re: Long Wittenham Surname Search [1]
At least one Tyrrell was an historical naughty boy. A fella by that name is said by some historians to have been the laddie who -- on orders of Richard III -- carried out the killings of the princes in the towers. Still others argue that Richard III was a lovely bloke, nice to his mum and a general credit to the human race. On Mon, 23 July 2001, PaulineBastow@aol.com wrote: > > Hi, I am now looking for any information on the following surnames in > Long/Little Wittenham. > > CHEYNEY/CHENEY - My GGGr
5. Re: Long Wittenham Surname Search [1]
History and genealogy, of course, are fascinating siblings. I remember reading once that the Duchess of Kent is a descendant of both Charles I and Oliver Cromwell. That's interesting about your Woodville connection? Perhaps you can trace back to the royal in-laws. best bh On Thu, 26 July 2001, PaulineBastow@aol.com wrote: > > Hi Bernard and Eve > > I certainly seem to started something in my search for historical events > involving TYRRELL! > > By coincidence my partner's mother's maiden name wa
6. Re: Long Wittenham Surname Search [1]
Eve, I beg to differ. Tyrrell was a historical figure. Shakespeare is certainly responsible for spreading the story that Richard Third was a wanker, but Master Tyrrell appears in several works about the deaths of the princes. He was said to have worked for the Constable of the Tower and to have strangled the lads in their beds and buried them under a staircase. Coincidentally or not, the skeletons of two young boys were found near a staircase in the tower in the 1700s. Some received opinion accepts them as
7. Re: Grave Robbing [1]
The thread reminds me of the old Peter Sellers' song: "They're Removing Father's Grave To Build A Sewer." Think we should have a rousing chorus. bh On Sun, 29 July 2001, "Charles Crane" wrote: > > You have my sympathies. Often a notice is printed in the paper and if no > one responds (which we didn't because we lived out of the area at the time) > then the remains are simply dug up and carted to the local crematorium for > disposal. > > As you say, no records are necessarily kept. We certainly couldn
8. Fw: 1891 census [0.981267]
Me too. Is it possible for someone outside of berkshire to help? I live in Montreal but would be more than happy to return some of the favours that have been given to me in the past. betty ----- Original Message ----- From: "TaXaN" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 6:04 PM Subject: 1891 census > Hello... would like some more info re helping with 1891 census...would be more than happy to help if I can.. > > > Shirley, > New Zealand > > > ==== BERKSHIR
9. Re: BERKSHIRE-D Digest V01 #218 [0.981267]
unsubscribe
10. Kine Familly [0.981267]
Would somebody be kind enough to do a look up on the1881 census and send me a list of the kines in your county,that is if there are not to many. Kind regards Paul Broughton pwbroughton@aol.com Searching Kine,Broughton,Sales and Wimpress
11. CERTFICATES [0.981267]
Please could some one give me the address to send for birth certificates for Windsor. I believe if one gets them in the district they only cost #6. 50. New Windsor----Clewer----Wokingham------Reading------Spital. Thanks Judith
12. Re: Burials Index CD [0.981267]
Thanks Jill for this information. I will try SAG as you suggest and also ask around. Now that I know it exists, I may find someone who knows of it. Often the problem is that one does not know what exists. Good luck with your searches. betty ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jill and Ian ROY" To: Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: Re: Burials Index CD > Betty, > I used the CD at my genealogical society, in Sydney, Australia. It is a > buria
13. RE: Eve's replies [0.981267]
Janet - [I too am Welsh] - I agree entirely with you. This List would be much the poorer if Eve was not on it. We are all extremely lucky that Eve contributes as she does. She is exceptionally knowledgeable. I didn't see the message, which caused the upset but it quite easy to interpret something differently in an email, as I did on the Oxfordshire list two days ago. Jill Jill Muir, e-mail:- jill@muir.clara.co.uk See our websites at: http://www.muir.clara.net/homepage/index.htm and some 1891 census at: htt
14. SUE HEDGES(WHAT AN I DOING WRONG)Charlton lost certificate Help [0.981267]
Hi Sue I tried ordering from FamilyNet they have turned up trumps on other searches for me but not this time they did a search sep 1837-41 with the info of where born from the 1881 census regards Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: Sue Parsons To: Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 10:57 PM Subject: Re: (WHAT AN I DOING WRONG)Charlton lost certificate Help > Hi Karen > > Where did you try ordering these Birth Certificates from? What information > did you p
15. Re: KIMBER - MOODY [0.981267]
Hi Don I have a William Bristow and Priscilla Kimber married in White Waltham, Berks 15/10/1789. Priscilla is actually stated as Timber. So you helped me out by trying to figure out what her name was. As there are no Timbers around. I don`t know anymore about her yet. Pauline ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Burt" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:34 PM Subject: KIMBER - MOODY > Hi > > I had a reponse to my first email from somone (sorry, I've lost
16. Re: AYRES in Maidenhead [0.981267]
Brian, I will check my files - I believe I may have some AYRES in one of my GARRAWAY files. I'll get back to you on my AOL addy. Talk to you soon. Your "cousin" PAUL. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Garraway" To: Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 6:46 AM Subject: AYRES in Maidenhead > Hello, > I am new to the list & wondered if anyone has any info on Henry AYRES born c 1800 @ either Maidenhead or Bray, his wife Theodosa (maiden name not known)
17. virus found in attachment from Bernard Hunt [0.981267]
To Bernard Hunt who sent me a reply to my CHILDS/HOLLOWAY post, my ISP intercepted the following: > Antigen for Exchange found hamster.ZIP.scr infected with W32/Badtrans-A > (Sophos,Norman) virus. > The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: William CHILDS m. > Patience HOLLOWAY ", was > sent from Bernard Hunt and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound > located at Imagen/NEPTUNE1/NEPTUNE. When you havesorted this out, please contact me again. Thanks, Doreen
18. Re: Re - Rev. Francis SLADE [0.981267]
Hello Hugh Thanks for this At present these SLADES (Francis b.c1826 & Richard b.c1833) don't fit into what I have, but may well when I get further back on other branches I'm not sure about Mary either but will keep it for future reference Sooner or later I'm sure all these SLADE's will fit together Helen ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 11:29 PM Subject: Re: Re - Rev. Francis SLADE > Helen, > > Does this help? > > 1
19. Marriage look up John BUNCE [0.981267]
Hi all, Would SKS be able to do a marriage look up for me please on the North Berkshire marriage index. John BUNCE and Jane, this should be around 1720 in the Stanford in the Vale area. Kind Regards Dave Allen
20. Re: Oxfordshire Baptism Index [0.981267]
Kerri, The marriage is easy from the Oxfordshire Marriage Index: PHIPPS Charles at OX St Ebbe to CROZIER Mary Ann on 1829 14 Jan The 1851 (transcribed and indexed by Oxfordshire Family History Society) gives Mary Ann's birth place as Oxford St. Aldate. Oxford City has a baptism Index 1800 to 1837 which gives: 1807 5 Aug CROZIER Mary Ann d. James & Mary born 10 July Hugh Kearsey
21. DARBY/LANGFORD/WILSON [0.981267]
I am new to your list and trying to find family who never seem to be at home for any length of time so now am researching all close Parishes/Counties, Researching the below!! George Eld Darby (No1) (Require Father/Mother/Siblings), Born 1766 British Army Officer 59th Reg, Listed as a Farmer Wiltshire Eng. == married at Hampshire England on 8 12 1799 to, **Emily LANGFORD was born 16th July 1779 and an address of being of being sometime at "No2 St. Georges Place Southampton" (Marriage Certifcate shows GE
22. INTERESTS [0.981267]
ELLIS . Bourne End, Windsor LOVEGROVE; Rose Street, Wokingham---Clewer---Eton Horton--Hedgerly--Cookham---Hope Cottage, Eton---Rose Street, Wokingham WILLOUGHBY ; Reading---Amersham---Chalfont St Peter. CHAPMAN; George Green, Slough----Wexham---Fulmer All in England Judith from sunny Scotland
23. Re: Kine Familly -query for Marilyn [0.981267]
Hi Marilyn, Intrigued to see your comment on the number of KINES on IGI. Although I have no personal interest in the KINE name your reply has caused me to wonder..... Is there some sort of index/list to the IGI.....can I look and see the number of other names and if so, how do I go about it? Thanks for your help Janet janetjohnstone@xtra.co.nz
24. Re: HELP NEEDED [0.981267]
Donna I am sorry but my guess would be Not Known :-( Sue Hedges ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donna Doyle" To: Sent: 23 July 2001 20:25 Subject: HELP NEEDED > Hi > I have just discovered a new ancestor of mine on the 1881 census but I'm a bit stuck on his place of birth it says N K Berkshire that's all! > Does anyone out there know what N K is short for? > All help gratefully received. > > Regards > Donna Doyle > > > > > > > > Donna.Doyle
25. Re: LEACH marriage,Faringdon area [0.981267]
In message <3B4D2FC4.EB684533@xtra.co.nz>, David Sharman writes > >Dear Listers > >I have found a Stephen LEACH/LEECH married Sep-Dec 1838, registered >Faringdon district. While visiting the Berkshire CRO, I looked for this >marriage in the Faringdon Parish Church register but with no success. That is because the civil registration district covers a number of parishes, of which Faringdon is only one. The simplest way to get the information is to buy this certificate, which will show w
Viewing 1-25 of 389 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.499924