Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:board
Viewing 1-25 of 21,483 matches from 36,027,463 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 03-12 [1]
Voting on the motion as it is stated: Tim Stowell: No Margie Daniels: Yes Brenda Pierce: No Chuck Pierce: No --Heather Jones DeGeorge SE/MA CC Rep ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" To: Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 6:05 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 03-12 > It has been moved by Jana Black and seconded by Vickie Shaffer that the > USGenWeb Advisory Board declare Tim Stowell, Margie Daniels, Brenda Pierce, > and Chuck Pierce be
2. [BOARD-L] Fwd: {not a subscriber} USGenWeb Election - Last day for Nominations [1]
>This is a reminder that the USGenWeb Election Committee will cease taking >nominations for the National 2003 Election, on Monday, June 16, 2003 8 AM >ET, 7 AM CT. > >As of this writing, the EC has received a total of 128 nominations. There >is at least one candidate for every open position. > >Check the Election Committee Nationals 2003 web pages for a list of >nominees and candidates, as well as general information about open >positions and voting. >http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/nationals-i
3. [BOARD-L] RESULTS Motion 03-14 [1]
With 8 members voting YES, 2 members voting NO and 5 members not voting, the motion passes. -Isaiah Richard "Isaiah" Harrison National Coordinator The USGenWeb Project
4. RE: [BOARD-L] MNIGS [1]
Don & Phyllis, Jumping in.... Sorry to be the "wet blanket" once again, but upon what authority do you think this AB could "define" MNIGS for states? I am not in disagreement that the playing field needs to be leveled, but I wonder if we are even "in the ballpark" discussing this... Pie in the sky???? Jana -----Original Message----- From: Don Kelly [mailto:donkelly@grovenet.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:00 PM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] MNIGS Yes, but with monstrous diffic
5. [BOARD-L] Fw: [EC] AB Question - Question of Privilege [1]
I am submitting this on behalf of the Election Committee and have taken the liberty of appending the subject with "Question of Privilege". This is of an important urgent nature and demands the Boards immediate attention. Tina Vickery NE/NC SC Representative Advisory Board Representative to the Elections Committee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ellen Pack" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:12 PM Subject: [EC] AB Question > TO: USGenWeb Ad
6. Re: [BOARD-L] ADJOURNMENT [1]
I didn't get Richard's message to vote but I vote YES. Vicki ----- Original Message ----- From: "bookstorelady" To: Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:02 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] ADJOURNMENT > Yes > Darilee Bednar > > NW/Plains Rep > --- "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" > wrote: > > It has been moved by Angie and seconded by Darilee > > and Vicki that this > > session of the Advisory Board by adjourned. > > > > Those in favor please vote YES,
7. [BOARD-L] Bettie Wood [1]
In the matter of Bettie Wood's challenge to being determined ineligible to run for office by the GAGenWeb State Coordinator. After hearing the evidence, the Advisory Board sustains her challenge and declares Bettie Wood ELIGIBLE to run for the office of SouthEast Mid-Atlantic County Coordinator Representative. -Isaiah Richard "Isaiah" Harrison National Coordinator The USGenWeb Project "No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent." Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)
8. Re: [BOARD-L] Grievance [1]
Thank you Richard, I have opened the discussion on Board-EXEC. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" To: Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 10:47 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Grievance > As I am named in the grievance regarding Teresa Lindquist, Tina Vickery > will serve as Temporary Chair to preside over the discussion of that issue. > > -Isaiah > > Richard "Isaiah" Harrison > National Coordinator > The USGenWeb Project > > > ==== BOARD Mailing
9. RE: [BOARD-L] agenda? [1]
Hi Darilee, First of all, I strongly encourage you to get a copy of Sturgis or the way what is done on the AB will seem utterly confounding. Since EXEC is "closed session" what we do there is out of the eyes of the membership because it surrounds discussion of sensitive matters. BOARD-L is our "board table" and if there is a motion on it, there can be no other discussion. I suspect in a way, what we need is the opposite of what you have suggested. Sturgis recommends the following "Order of Business" at me
10. RE: [BOARD-L] A New Special Project [1]
I move that the Family Group Sheet Project be established as a Special Project affiliated with The USGenWeb Project. Angie Rayfield SE/MA CC Rep >-----Original Message----- >From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison [mailto:IsaiahH@cox.net] >Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 4:34 PM >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: [BOARD-L] A New Special Project > > >The AB has receivd tha following letter from members wishing >to start a new >Special Project afiliated with The USGenWeb Project. > >May I please hear a motion to
11. RE: [BOARD-L] VOTE AMENDMENT to Motion 03-14 [1]
Yes. Robert Bremer bremerr@oclc.org -----Original Message----- From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison [mailto:IsaiahH@cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:09 PM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [BOARD-L] VOTE AMENDMENT to Motion 03-13 It was moved by Gail and seconded by Angie that The Family Groupsheet Pages Project would respectfully request that the Board take into consideration postponing this vote for six months. During that time, we request that the FGS Project: 1) At least be acknowledged by the
12. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion to Close Debate [1]
No on motion to close debate. More time should be given to the new members. Jan Cortez ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" > It has been moved by Tina and seconded by Vicki that debate on Motion 03-12 > be closed and we immediately proceed to a vote on that motion. > > Vote "Yes" if you agree, "No" if you disagree. Members will have until > approximately 7:45 pm MST, Monday, May 2 to vote. The Motion to close > requires a 2/3 majority. > > -Isaiah > > > ==== BOARD Mailing List
13. RE: [BOARD-L] VOTE AMENDMENT to Motion 03-13 [1]
Yes. Jana Black -----Original Message----- From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison [mailto:IsaiahH@cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:09 AM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [BOARD-L] VOTE AMENDMENT to Motion 03-13 It was moved by Gail and seconded by Angie that The Family Groupsheet Pages Project would respectfully request that the Board take into consideration postponing this vote for six months. During that time, we request that the FGS Project: 1) At least be acknowledged by the USGenWeb Project.
14. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion to adjourn [1]
I wish to second this motion Darilee Bednar NW/Plains CC Rep --- Angie Rayfield wrote: > I move to adjourn this session of the Advisory > Board. > > Angie Rayfield > SEMA CC Representative > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.493 / Virus Database: 292 - Release > Date: 6/25/2003 > > > > ==== BOARD Mailing List ==== > "No man is good enough to govern another man without > that other's conse
15. Fwd: {not a subscriber} Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 03-12 [1]
>Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:56:46 -0600 >X-From_: tstowell@chattanooga.net Mon Jun 9 19:56:46 2003 >X-Sender: tstowell@mail.chattanooga.net (Unverified) >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) >Old-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 19:27:12 -0400 >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com >From: Tim Stowell >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=6.0 > tests=CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 > version=2.43 >X-Spam-Level: >X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list >Subject
16. [BOARD-L] RE: [BOARD-L] VOTE-MOTION 03-14 [1]
Yes Jana Black -----Original Message----- From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison [mailto:IsaiahH@cox.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:30 PM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [BOARD-L] VOTE-MOTION 03-14 It has been moved and seconded that the Family Group Sheet Project be established as a Special Project affiliated with The USGenWeb Project and that: The Family Groupsheet Pages Project would respectfully request that the Board take into consideration postponing this vote for six months. During that
17. RE: [BOARD-L] RESULTS Amendment to Motion 03-14 [1]
At 04:09 PM 6/20/2003 -0700, you wrote: >Only that if this amended motion passes, I think it only fair that the >AB determine and communicate what specifically we mean by "be >acknowledged," and "get better organized" so the FGSP has an idea of >what it is working towards rather then having to fly blind. Jana Do you want to put something together and present it to the AB? -Isaiah
18. [BOARD-L] MNIGS [1]
First: No, it does not require a bylaws change to make mediation mandatory. It is the mediation process itself that makes it voluntary. The bylaws just state that the AB may be called upon to mediate and the mediation process was put in place to give a procedure if the AB is thus called on. So, because it is a procedure, it would be much easier to "amend" the mediation procedure than try to change a bylaw. Second: Do you want to just leave the ambiguous word "standards" in place with no definitions and
19. Re: [BOARD-L] MOTION 03-14 [1]
Pam, you have brought up something that is very important as well. I believe that we should resolve the issue of the Census Project seat before taking on any more projects. Jan Cortez ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pam Reid" > Well, I sort of agree with Jan on this. I feel that SPs are important in > certain categories, like Census and Cemeteries because of the great number > of them and our major push to get as many online as possible. Family Group > Sheets are quite obvi
20. Re: [BOARD-L] Bylaws/Elections [1]
I would then ask why the ASC of WI is allowed to run for SC Rep in the NE/NC Region? Whose responsibility is it to verify eligibility? Respectfully, Jan Cortez NE/NC CC Rep ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phyllis Rippee" > Mr. NC and AB Colleagues: > > The EC Procedural Rules state that the eligibility of a candidate are based > on the bylaws. > > I have read the bylaws in regard to SC Representative positions. I do not > know what has been done in the past, but if ASCs have be
21. RE: [BOARD-L] MNIGS [1]
>The bylaws are clear on what constitutes a member not in good >standing....up >to a point. That point is where it says (paraphrasing) doing >something in >violation of the guidelines and standards of the Project. >And, when you get >into what are the "standards" of the Project........my standards may be >different from your standards, so which of us is right? > >So, the way I see it, one of our tasks is to define >"standards". The other >task is to come up with steps that the mnigs can follow to hav
22. Re: [BOARD-L] RESULTS Motion 03-12 [1]
Stand corrected, thank you for the explanation. Gail ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] RESULTS Motion 03-12 At 03:26 PM 6/10/2003 -0700, you wrote: >With the vote on Margie Daniels isn't she at fault here? > >Gail A two-thirds majority was required to sustain the charges. -Isaiah ==== BOARD Mailing List ==== Want to know Who's Who in USGenWeb? Visit: http://ww
23. Re: {not a subscriber} Re: [BOARD-L] AMENDMENT to MOTION 03-14 [1]
I was withdrawing my second on the original motion, not the amendment. Gail ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:34 PM Subject: Re: {not a subscriber} Re: [BOARD-L] AMENDMENT to MOTION 03-14 At 09:39 PM 6/16/2003 -0700, you wrote: >I made the second to this motion and I withdraw my second. Sorry, you can't do that. First, before doing anything else we need to deal with the amendment you proposed. You
24. RE: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 03-12 [1]
Tim Stowell: Yes Margie Daniels: Yes Brenda Pierce: Yes Chuck Pierce: Yes Angie Rayfield SE/MA CC Representative >-----Original Message----- >From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison [mailto:IsaiahH@cox.net] >Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:06 PM >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 03-12 > > >It has been moved by Jana Black and seconded by Vickie Shaffer >that the >USGenWeb Advisory Board declare Tim Stowell, Margie Daniels, >Brenda Pierce, >and Chuck Pierce be found members not in good st
25. RE: [BOARD-L] MNIGS [1]
>However, I think that if an action is wrong, it is wrong, no >matter what >State it occurs in, or the size of the State. My right to >swing my fist >ends where your nose begins. That is true regardless of what >State we're >standing in. So, I don't think that size matters when it comes to what >someone would do to be declared mnigs, although it would effect how to >handle a decision as to "should it be sustained." I may not have expressed it as well as I could have -- you're right, wrong is wrong, w
Viewing 1-25 of 21,483 matches from 36,027,463 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.349947