Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:board +(+date:apr +date:2002)
Viewing 1-25 of 326 matches from 36,123,953 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Next
1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 [1]
In a message dated 4/20/2002 12:04:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time, IsaiahHarrison@cs.com writes: > I move to amend Motion 02-09 to read: > > I move that the National Coordinator appoint a Board Secretary, subject > to the Advisory Board's approval, with duties to be determined by the > National Coordinator and Advisory Board, and to serve until the end of the > National Coordinator's term. The Board Secretary will not be a current > member of the Board of Directors. This motion rescinds all previous m
2. [BOARD-L] Re: BTW [1]
Phyllis, You are right. I apology. Diane ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phyllis Rippee" To: Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:23 AM Subject: [BOARD-L] BTW > When someone asks why we voted the way we did, that is in violation of > Sturgis. So, to ask us what we objected to in the previous motion, is > tantamount to the same thing.....i.e. is in violation of Sturgis. > > If the vote is to reconsider the previous motion, said motion can then be > amended.
3. [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - VOTE [1]
Please vote on Motion 02-09 as amended >>I move that the National Coordinator appoint a Board Secretary, subject >>to the Advisory Board's approval, with duties to be determined by the >>National Coordinator and Advisory Board, to serve a term concurrent with >>that of the National Coordinator. The Board Secretary must be a member of >>the USGenWeb Project; must not be a member of the Advisory Board; and >>must possess skills in writing reports and webpage maintenance. This >>motion rescinds all prev
4. Re: [BOARD-L] Understanding [1]
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Kathy Heidel wrote: > Since "this" AB came into being, are we selecting the Representative to > fill out the original term of the person who is leaving or until the next > Election? I am so sorry to be so darn dense but I am. Take my hand, I am on > a Kindergarten Level here and perhaps you can answer this question for me? > Did we just select Ginger to fill in Nathan's position until this "Election" > or does she stay on the AB until the end of Nathan's term? She holds the seat
5. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - Call for Vote [1]
Yes Mary Ann Hetrick >From: Holly Timm >Reply-To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - Call for Vote >Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 20:18:38 -0400 > >Please vote on the call to vote, yes to vote on the motion, no to continue >discussion. > _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com
6. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - Call for Vote [1]
The Call to vote passes, please vote on the motion >> > > The following motion has been made by Ron Eason and seconded by Diane >> > > Parsons. >> > > >> > > At 10:44 PM 3/29/02 -0500, Ron Eason wrote: >> > > >I move to rescind and replace Motion 99-25 with the following: >> > > > >> > > >The National Coordinator will appoint a secretary for the term of the >> > > >current Board [ie, to serve from when they are appointed until August >> > > >31]. Secretaries may be retained for continuous service if the N
7. [BOARD-L] Guidelines Committee, report for the week ending 4/13/2002 [1]
GUIDELINES COMMITTEE WEEKLY REPORT, for the week ending April 13 2002 === On April 7, the weekly report was submitted to the Project. A comment was received from a member who suggested that in considering the requirement of a local resources listing the committee is overstepping its bounds and that long-term members of the Project will object. This comment was discussed by the Committee and the members are in general agreement that the Guidelines Committee may need to recommend changes that go beyo
8. Re: [BOARD-L] Re: Discussion [1]
At 08:58 PM 4/22/2002 -0400, you wrote: >I guess my point is, that we have had numerous motions, calls, votes, >votes, and more votes.. we have all pretty much said the same thing, >with semantics being the issue, IMHO. I think it would be a very bad >idea to pass a generic motion just to be done with it, and move on, I >truly do. Have we reached a consensus? > >Tina But, it would be a good idea to pass a simple motion because that is appropriate for dealing with this situation. In order for me to supp
9. [BOARD-L] Let's Try One More Time--A Board Secretary [1]
Kathy, would you mind "tweaking" this motion just a little? Like, have the National Coordinator, appoint a person to fill the vacancy. As opposed to the Nation (sic) Coordinator appoint a secretary to fill the vacancy. Phyllis
10. Re: [BOARD-L] Special Project Status Problem [1]
Yes Tina, Here it is. http://www.us-census.org/cphome/bylaws.htm Ron ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Special Project Status Problem > Ron, > > Could you post the URL to the bylaws to which you refer, please. > > Tina > >
11. RE: [BOARD-L] Rescinding [1]
Phyllis, Thanks for clarifying this... I had thought that new decisions as a result of overrode old decisions and the idea that we would have to first rescind seemed quite odd. Just like with codicils to wills, a new motion, once passed overrides anything said previously. Jana -----Original Message----- From: Phyllis Rippee [mailto:wchs@getgoin.net] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 9:40 AM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [BOARD-L] Rescinding Look it up in Sturgis. The ONLY time that it is necessary to r
12. [BOARD-L] Re; Let's try one more time....A Board Secretary [1]
I second this motion, again Diane Parsons ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kathy Heidel" To: Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:02 AM Subject: [BOARD-L] Let's try one more time....A Board Secretary > Holly, > I move that the Nation Coordinator appoint a Secretary to fill the > vacancy of Board Secretary. > The Board Secretary will assist in the posting of Motions and Board Business > to the Board Lists > Provide the membership with the exact wording of a pen
13. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 Amendment - VOTE [1]
No discussion. Phyllis ----- Original Message ----- From: Holly Timm To: Sent: 29 April, 2002 6:02 AM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 Amendment - VOTE > > The amendment passes. Please indicate whether you have any further > discussion on the motion. > >
14. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - Call for Vote [1]
No. Tim At 07:20 AM 4/12/02 -0400, you wrote: > >The Call to vote passes, please vote on the motion
15. [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - Call for Vote [1]
Please vote on the call to vote, yes to vote on the motion, no to continue discussion. At 10:50 AM 4/4/02 -0600, GingerH wrote: >I second the call > >Ginger >gingerh@shawneelink.com >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Kathy Heidel" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:44 PM >Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] New Motion > > > > Holly, > > There has been no discussion on this Motion for quite awhile and I am > > Calling the Question so we may vote on this and hopefully
16. Re: [BOARD-L] Discussion [1]
I am confused, if we don't articulate what is expected, how will we know if he/she performing up to expectations? Tina In a message dated 4/21/2002 1:50:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, IsaiahHarrison@cs.com writes: > I don't think it is necessary to add the phrase "Secretary's term to run > concurrently with the NC's term, but subject to termination by the NC and > Advisory Board." I think this is understood. I don't believe it is > necessary to get involved with a detailed list of duties, responsibi
17. [BOARD-L] Special Projects Status Problem [1]
Yes, the Archives considers itself part of the USGenWeb Project. We have no bylaws......only guidelines on copyright, filename format and directory structure. Vicki
18. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-29 Discussion [1]
At 07:05 AM 4/19/02 -0400, TVick65536@aol.com wrote: >Okay, Holly, as a Board member what do you want in a Board Secretary? I had no problem with the outline of the Board Secretaries duties and qualifications in Motion 02-09. The only real change I would make there is that perhaps we don't need to require all those skills but rather phrase it something like: The duties of the Secretary may include....... instead of *will* include... Thus a candidate who is lacking one skill may be acceptable
19. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - Call for Vote [1]
no Jana Black > > The Call to vote passes, please vote on the motion > > >> > > The following motion has been made by Ron Eason and seconded by Diane > >> > > Parsons. > >> > > > >> > > At 10:44 PM 3/29/02 -0500, Ron Eason wrote: > >> > > >I move to rescind and replace Motion 99-25 with the following: > >> > > > > >> > > >The National Coordinator will appoint a secretary for the term of the > >> > > >current Board [ie, to serve from when they are appointed until August > >> > > >31]. Secretaries may be r
20. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - VOTE [1]
Yes. Tina Vickery In a message dated Tue, 30 Apr 2002 6:58:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Holly Timm writes: > >Please vote on Motion 02-09 as amended > >>>I move that the National Coordinator appoint a Board Secretary, subject >>>to the Advisory Board's approval, with duties to be determined by the >>>National Coordinator and Advisory Board, to serve a term concurrent with >>>that of the National Coordinator. The Board Secretary must be a member of >>>the USGenWeb Project; must not
21. Re: [BOARD-L] Special Project Status Problem [1]
Ginger, > "They purport to be part of the project *but*, conduct > their own elections, vigorously resist any hint of encroachment into their > operational realm by the AB or anyone else" > If this is pertaining to the census project, the answer is because they were forced to do things for themselves after the de-linking. However, their election have been conducted as such to try and abide by the USGW Bylaws, for electing Coordinators, etc. > > It has been stated when the Bylaws were mentioned that > thei
22. [BOARD-L] Simple Simon! [1]
You know it is absolutely astounding to me that something as simple as having a Board Secretary is so mind boggling to so many members. You would think that we were electing some one to guard Fort Knox or something.! Do you all realize how silly this is? I do and I am not the smartest page in the book! It is not surprising that nothing can be accomplished with this group, I am very frustrated and ashamed. Kathy "Life is not a race but a journey to be savored each step of the way."
23. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 [1]
At 10:37 AM 4/24/2002 -0500, Phyllis wrote: >I respectfully suggest the sentence "This motion rescinds all previous >motions of the Board regarding the Board Secretary" removed from an >amendment, or rewording, of motion 02-09. The latest motion passed by an >Advisory Board takes precedence over ALL previous motions. Therefore, this >sentence is superfluous. > > >Phyllis I disagree. The Board has taken previous action on this subject on several occasions. Although these previous actions would be "rescin
24. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 - VOTE [1]
At 06:57 AM 4/30/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Please vote on Motion 02-09 as amended > >>>I move that the National Coordinator appoint a Board Secretary, subject >>>to the Advisory Board's approval, with duties to be determined by the >>>National Coordinator and Advisory Board, to serve a term concurrent with >>>that of the National Coordinator. The Board Secretary must be a member >>>of the USGenWeb Project; must not be a member of the Advisory Board; and >>>must possess skills in writing reports and webp
25. [BOARD-L] Motion 02-09 [1]
No Vicki
Viewing 1-25 of 326 matches from 36,123,953 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.529919