Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:board +(+date:feb +date:2003)
Viewing 1-25 of 232 matches from 36,116,086 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next
1. [BOARD-L] Amendment to Motion 02-23 [1]
While traditionally all AB votes have been conducted on Board-L, the only requirement in the bylaws is that the AB votes be posted publicly. This does not say that the votes have to take place in full view of the general membership......but that they must be posted publicly. Therefore, in order to insure that one entity's vote does not influence the other and yet still comply with the bylaws in regard to the AB vote, I move to adopt the following amendment to Part C. [first part is the same, addition at b
2. Re: [BOARD-L] Point of Order [1]
At 10:35 AM 2/21/03 -0700, you wrote: >At 09:15 AM 2/21/2003 -0600, you wrote: >>Mr. NC: >> >>The USGenWeb Project Bylaws state that ALL issues voted on by the Advisory >>Board must be made public; that ALL issues require a quorum of 9; and that >>ALL issues require a 2/3 vote to pass. >> >>Therefore, your ruling is incorrect in regard to the appointment of David >>Samuelson to the EC. >> >>Phyllis Rippee >>SW/SC CC Representative > >The Chair holds that where the bylaws state "Issues shall require a 2/3 >
3. [BOARD-L] Motion 02-23 [1]
Good Afternoon Mr NC, It is a day and a half past the time that you set to close the voting for Amendment 2 of Motion 02-23, and with a count of nine "yes" and one "no', the Amendment passes. Now, I call the question/vote on the main Motion 02-23. Thank you. Bill Oliver NW/Plains CC Rep -=-
4. Re: [BOARD-L] EC Request for Committee Member Confirmation [1]
Towards you - I believe it was. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill" > Question: Is this the same W. David Samuelson who was moderated on the > -Discuss List for reactionary derogatory remarks a while back?? > > Bill Oliver > -=- > > "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" wrote: > > > >>Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:00:54 -0500 > > >>To: "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" > > >>From: Ellen Pack > > >>Subject: EC Request for Committee Member C
5. RE: [BOARD-L] VOTE--MOTION 02-23--AMENDMENT #2 [1]
YES R/S Larry Flesher SW/SC SC Rep
6. Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE Appeal from the Ruling of the Chair [1]
Yes jimmy "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" wrote: > As there seems to be no discussion I will call for the vote. > > The Chair has the following motion out of order: > > I move that the AB instruct the NC that before we entertain any request > for the removal of any State Coordinator that we finish due process a set > forth by the NC, to wit: the SC finishes his statements, that his counsel > be given the opportunity to speak, the AB gets to ask questions, and > finally decide if there is cause. And, furt
7. Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE--Motion 03-02 EC Request for Committee Member Confirmation [1]
No, to the appointment of W. David Samuelson to the Elections Committee [Motion 03-02, I believe]. Bill Oliver NW/Plains CC Rep -=- "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" wrote: > As there seems to be no more discussion regarding the appointment of W. > David Samuelson to the Elections Committee, please vote "Yes" if in favor, > "No" if opposed. Voting will continue until approximately 10 pm, MST > Thursday, February 20, 2003. > > -Isaiah > > ==== BOARD Mailing List ==== > Standing Procedures for the Advisory Board
8. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-23 [1]
My apologies Phyllis. I did not intend rude. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phyllis Rippee" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-23 > First of all: "The proposer" has a name. Use it. > > Second of all: This is not MY motion. Once the Assembly accepted it, it > became the Assembly's motion, so quit treating me and it as if it was my > personal property. As the Assembly's property any AB member may propose >
9. Re: [BOARD-L] Request for Special Elections [1]
At 11:15 AM 2/25/2003 -0600, you wrote: >Mr. NC: > >A 2/3 majority of what? No one has asked if this is a 2/3 majority of a >quorum as defined by USGW P bylaws. > >Phyllis Rippee >SW/SC CC Representative ????? A quorum of 9 is required on all votes. A motion to direct the EC to do anything would require a 2/3 majority of those voting. -Isaiah
10. [BOARD-L] RE: Point of Order [1]
In-Reply-To: <<010b01c2c0d9$ef3bb8e0$11c83718@agstme.adelphia.net>> At 06:16 PM 1/20/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Thank you, but even at that, is that 2/3's > >Tina There were 8 "yes" votes and 4 "no" votes, exactly a 2/3 majority. The abstain is counted in order to establish a quorum, but not counted in determining whether or not there is a 2/3 majority. -Isaiah ***************REPLY SEPARATOR********** This was in reference to Kimberly and myself being elected to the EC. I guess I am confused here. If
11. [BOARD-L] EC [1]
So long as the discussion remains more or less general, it is appropriate to discuss it here. However, it is not appropriate to post unsubstantiated accusations regarding volunteers to this public list. When you comments have more to do with personalities (or with your personality conflicts!) please direct them to Board-Exec. -Isaiah Richard "Isaiah" Harrison National Coordinator The USGenWeb Project
12. RE: [BOARD-L] Motion to Amend [1]
I second Phyllis' motion to amend. Larry Flesher
13. Re: [BOARD-L] MOTION 02-23--AMENDMENT 2 [1]
And I understand your point Bill. Thank you for humoring me. I still really feel it undermines the Election Committee Procedures. I won't berate it. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 7:05 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] MOTION 02-23--AMENDMENT 2 > Good Evening Fellow Members, > > I'm pretty sure I understand your words, Tina, and that's fine as far as it > goes. My point in favoring the EC to collect our in
14. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-23 [1]
Mr NC, I call a point of order. If the results can be announced, then the floor is open for business. Thank You, Bill Oliver NW/Plains CC Rep -=- "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" wrote: > At 05:21 PM 2/11/2003 -0500, you wrote: > >Mr NC, > > > >At some point back, you said that once a quorum was reached and the > >outcome was > >obvious, we did not have to wait for you to call the motion "passed" or > >"failed". > > No, I didn't say that. > > I did say results of votes may be announced once eno
15. Fwd: [EC] Fwd: Re: [BOARD-L] MOTION 02-23--AMENDMENT 2 [1]
>Resent-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:24:07 -0700 >X-Original-Sender: e.j.pack@natchezbelle.org Tue Feb 4 09:24:05 2003 >X-Sender: e.j.pack@natchezbelle.org@mail.packnet.net >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 >Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:24:40 -0500 >Old-To: ELECTIONS-L@rootsweb.com >From: Ellen Pack >Subject: [EC] Fwd: Re: [BOARD-L] MOTION 02-23--AMENDMENT 2 >To: ELECTIONS-L@rootsweb.com >Resent-From: ELECTIONS-L@rootsweb.com >Reply-To: ELECTIONS-L@rootsweb.com >X-Mailing-
16. Re: FW: PLEASE - Re: [BOARD-L] Request for Special Election [1]
At 01:15 PM 2/25/2003 -0800, you wrote: >I asked for and was given permission to pass this question along, saying >I did not know the answer. > >Jana > >-----Original Message----- >From: JohnR238@aol.com [mailto:JohnR238@aol.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:25 AM >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com >Cc: janab@websweweave.net >Subject: Re: PLEASE - Re: [BOARD-L] Request for Special Election > > >What about the dozen of us who have already been kicked out by Tim? Do >we get to vote? > >John Rigdon It will be
17. Re: [BOARD-L] EC Request for Committee Member Confirmation [1]
Question: Is this the same W. David Samuelson who was moderated on the -Discuss List for reactionary derogatory remarks a while back?? Bill Oliver -=- "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" wrote: > >>Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:00:54 -0500 > >>To: "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" > >>From: Ellen Pack > >>Subject: EC Request for Committee Member Confirmation > >> > >>When opportunity presents, will you please forward the following to the > >>AB for consideration? > >> > >>Tha
18. Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE--MOTION02-23 AMENDMENT [1]
YES R/S Larry Flesher SW/SC SC Rep
19. Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE--MOTION 02-23 [1]
Good Morning, Yes, to Motion 02-23. Bill Oliver NW/Plains CC Rep -=- "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" wrote: > As there has been no second to Ron's Motion to Close Debate or to Tina's > Amendment, and no further discussion, we will vote on Motion 02-23. > > Please vote "yes" if in favor, "no" if opposed. Voting will continue until > approximately 6:00 PM MST, Friday, February 14. > > A. The process for removal of an SC or ASC may be initiated by the Advisory > Board on a 2/3 favorable vote of a q
20. Re: [BOARD-L] MOTION 02-23--AMENDMENT 2 [1]
At 10:24 PM 2/5/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Certainly. It would seem to me that having the secretary field our votes >and hold >them until the EC announces the results of their "polling" or voting, >whichever it >becomes is a viable solution or compromise. It belays Tina's "fears" and >satisfies the spirit of my take on the amendment, and I'm sure that an >agreement >to insure the confidentiality of the votes from all eyes can be spelled out. >However, technically, Phyllis is the author, it was my second.
21. [BOARD-L] RESULTS--MOTION 02-23 [1]
With 8 members voting "yes," 4 members voting "no," and three members not voting, Motion 02-23 passes. -Isaiah Richard "Isaiah" Harrison National Coordinator The USGenWeb Project
22. Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE--MOTION 02-23 AMENDMENT [1]
Jan, I could, but I think the better course would be for all of us to discuss it and present a motion that is beneficial to the project. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Cortez" To: Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 6:03 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE--MOTION 02-23 AMENDMENT > Might I suggest that you write your own version Tina! > > Jan > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tina S Vickery" > > > I still have many questions and concerns abou
23. [BOARD-L] EC Candidate [1]
It has been moved and seconded that W. David Samuelson be approved to serve on the Election Committee. Discussion? -Isaiah
24. [BOARD-L] Resignation of Ron Eason [1]
The Advisory Board acknowledges with regret the resignation of Ron Eason, CC Representative for the Southeast/Mid-Atlantic Region. It is now the AB's responsibility to select a replacement to serve until the next regular election. I suggest that the most proper and efficient way to do this is to put out a call for volunteers and then, after consulting with your constituents, choose from among them. Comments? -Isaiah
25. RE: [BOARD-L] VOTE--Motion 03-02 EC Request for Committee Member Confirmation [1]
Yes. Robert Bremer bremerr@oclc.org -----Original Message----- From: Richard (Isaiah) Harrison [mailto:IsaiahH@cox.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:48 PM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [BOARD-L] VOTE--Motion 03-02 EC Request for Committee Member Confirmation As there seems to be no more discussion regarding the appointment of W. David Samuelson to the Elections Committee, please vote "Yes" if in favor, "No" if opposed. Voting will continue until approximately 10 pm, MST Thursday, February
Viewing 1-25 of 232 matches from 36,116,086 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.529918