Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:board +(+date:sep +date:1999)
Viewing 1-25 of 138 matches from 36,123,953 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next
1. Re: [BOARD-L] Call to Order 1999-2000 session [1]
Present Tina Vickery Northeast/North Central County Coordinator Representative.
2. Re: [BOARD-L] Call to Order 1999-2000 session [1]
Present RootsLady (aka) Barbara Yancey Dore Southwest/SouthCentral County Coordinator Representative ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Stowell To: Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 11:54 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Call to Order 1999-2000 session > I call this meeting of the 1999-2000 session of the USGenWeb Advisory Board > to order and ask that each member of the Board respond by saying: present > or here. > > Thanks, > > Tim Stowell > National Coordinator
3. [BOARD-L] Call to Order 1999-2000 session [1]
I call this meeting of the 1999-2000 session of the USGenWeb Advisory Board to order and ask that each member of the Board respond by saying: present or here. Thanks, Tim Stowell National Coordinator
4. Re: [BOARD-L] CoGenWeb [1]
Sorry, but RootsWeb staff doesn't change them until they have been asked. There is no slap in the face or anything underhanded in this. Betsy At 05:53 PM 09/09/1999 -0500, you wrote: > >http://www.usgenweb.org/co >http://www.rootsweb.com/~cogenweb/ > >Tim, >Would you contact Mr. Leverich and ask him what this >is all about please? Is Rootsweb now using what is supposed >to be our domains to forward to their pages? I would like some >clarification from RW please. >I've been a RootsWeb supporter for a l
5. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25 vote [1]
AYE RootsLady (aka) Barbara Yancey Dore RootsLady@lest-we-forget.com - RootsLady@email.msn.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Stowell To: Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 1:39 AM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25 vote > Seeing no further discussion on Motion 99-25: > > I move that Motion 99-2 be rescinded and that the Board appoint a > secretary for the one year term of Board II or until dismissed by Board > II or a succeeding Board. Further, > >
6. Re: [BOARD-L] Resignation Motion 99-24 [1]
Aye
7. Re: [BOARD-L] Re: Question for you [1]
But by "neutral third party" I am assuming Mr Smoot wants some one other than USGW people on the election committee and running the election -- much as Price-Waterhouse does for the Oscar nominations and balloting. We are not that big, important, and rich to afford to hire an outside contractor to run our elections. Jim's proposal has some merit, if there were 4 people on the election committee, three would set up receiving stations for the ballots on three different servers. At the close of ballot
8. [BOARD-L] Fwd: [STATE-COORD-L] Formal Complaint [1]
The following was sent to the State Coordinator's list. Since we are all subbed to that list, I presume you've seen it. >X-Loop: STATE-COORD-L@rootsweb.com > >I am, hereby, making a formal complaint to the board: > >Colorado's State pages were moved off of Rootsweb about a month ago. As the >SC for COGenWeb, I have the right, under our Bylaws, to move the State pages >to any server I choose. >When I moved the State pages off Rootsweb, I did not move the project pages >that my ASC had on the COGenWeb site,
9. Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: [STATE-COORD-L] Formal Complaint [1]
Hi guys. I'm back online with my new computer. My comments on the COGenWeb situation: As has been pointed out, we cannot dictate or "direct" RootsWeb to do anything. They are within thier rights to do as they wish with the ~cogenweb directory name. However, the fact that they "can" does not mean that they "should". The XXGenWeb designation should be reserved exclusively for the use of the USGenWeb Project, as we specify in our bylaws. Is RootsWeb bound by our bylaws? Of course not, but as good neigh
10. Re: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary [1]
Alright, then, I'll *second* the motion . Shari -----Original Message----- From: Ginger To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Date: Monday, September 20, 1999 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary >I move we approve Ed Book as the National Coordinators >choice for Advisory Board Secretary. > >NOT PART OF THE MOTION: >On a personal note, I would like to commend Tim on >his choice. I don't think he could have done better if >he had tried. > > >Gi
11. Re: [BOARD-L] Re: Question for you [1]
Before you ask, I realize that I was unclear... by results I meant as each vote was cast it would be sent to 3 places to be stored rather than one. Jim jpowelljr wrote: > > While we are on this topic. If it was possible to > simultaneously send the results to 3 separate servers to be > compared at the end, would this be nearly the same as a > neutral third party? > > Jim > > Shari Handley wrote: > > > > For me, this just creates more questions: > > > > How does one define a "neutral third party"? For
12. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22 [1]
Pam this is the note you sent on 8/30 in reply to my note of 8/30: Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 20:22:52 -0700 (PDT) From: pamreid@dc.jones.com Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 23:23:15 -0700 Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22 To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Just so you all know, I am visiting my Mother in South Carolina and don't have the software or ftp program I need to update the pages. I will be home by the weekend and will take care of it then. Sorry for the delay. Pam Tim Stowell wrote: > Motion 99-22 passes
13. [BOARD-L] Motion to Appoint a Secretary [1]
I move that Motion 99-2 be rescinded and that the Board appoint a secretary for the one year term of Board II or until dismissed by Board II or a succeeding Board. Further, 1. That the secretary nominee be selected from among the volunteer membership of the USGenWeb Project. 2. That the nominee to this position not be currently serving as a Board member. 3. That the nominee be nominated by the National Coordinator and appointed by a majority vote of a quorum of the Board. Rejection of an nominee will
14. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25-B [1]
Welcome, Ed! Great to have you with us. Shari -----Original Message----- From: Tim Stowell To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Date: Saturday, September 25, 1999 9:55 AM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25-B >Motion 99-25-B to appoint Ed Book as Secretary passes with 12 yes, 0 no, 3 >not voting, 1 position vacant. > >Please join me in welcoming Ed to our midst. Welcome Ed! > >Tim > >
15. Re: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary [1]
I move we approve Ed Book as the National Coordinators choice for Advisory Board Secretary. NOT PART OF THE MOTION: On a personal note, I would like to commend Tim on his choice. I don't think he could have done better if he had tried. Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com -----Original Message----- From: Tim Stowell To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Date: Monday, September 20, 1999 6:54 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary >I didn't really have to think
16. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25 vote [1]
Yes Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com -----Original Message----- From: Tim Stowell To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Date: Friday, September 17, 1999 1:34 AM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25 vote >Seeing no further discussion on Motion 99-25: > >I move that Motion 99-2 be rescinded and that the Board appoint a >secretary for the one year term of Board II or until dismissed by Board >II or a succeeding Board. Further, > >1. That the secretary nominee be selected fro
17. [BOARD-L] Re: Question for you [1]
In response to the question the Board wanted asked of Fred: >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:06:25 -0700 >From: Fred Smoot >Organization: Dog Trot X Press >To: Tim Stowell >Subject: Re: Question for you > >Tim Stowell wrote: >> >> Dear Fred, >> >> The Advisory Board respectfully wishes to know: what action you wanted to >> see taken in response to your protest? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tim > >Dear Tim, > >The most simple way to resolve the issue is this: > >If the US
18. Re: [BOARD-L] Resignation [1]
I second the motion, and wish Bonnie the best in her future endeavors. Shari -----Original Message----- From: Joy Fisher To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Date: Monday, September 13, 1999 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Resignation >Hi Fellow Board Members: > >I move we accept Bonnie McVicar-Briggs' resignation with regret and thank >her for her year's service on the Board. > >At 03:58 AM 9/13/99 -0500, you wrote: >>Dear Board members, >> >>Effective immediately I am re
19. Re: [BOARD-L] Resignation Motion 99-24 [1]
Aye RootsLady (aka) Barbara Yancey Dore ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Stowell To: Sent: Monday, September 13, 1999 6:47 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Resignation Motion 99-24 > Providing there is no more discussion, > > Please vote on Motion 99-24 made by Joy and seconded by Shari to accept > Bonnie's resignation by casting a yes, no, or abstain vote. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > At 08:22 AM 9/13/99 -0700, you wrote: > >Hi Fellow Board Members: > > > >I
20. Re: [BOARD-L] Fred's Formal Complaint [1]
At 09:24 PM 9/9/99 -0400, Jim wrote: > >Fred and his campaign manager did request a list of votes >with the time they were made, no names, no email addresses. >I have created such a list. The Election Committee decided >that the Board should decide if it should be released. Would said list also contain the candidate voted for?
21. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25 vote [1]
At 11:39 PM -0700 9/16/99, Tim Stowell wrote: >Seeing no further discussion on Motion 99-25: > >Please vote accordingly by saying - yes, no, abstain or something of >similar nature. Yes.
22. Re: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary [1]
I agree with your comments, Ginger. Ed is an excellent choice for secretary. Congratualtions, Tim. Joe Ginger wrote: > I move we approve Ed Book as the National Coordinators > choice for Advisory Board Secretary. > > NOT PART OF THE MOTION: > On a personal note, I would like to commend Tim on > his choice. I don't think he could have done better if > he had tried. > > Ginger > gingerh@shawneelink.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Stowell > To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.c
23. [BOARD-L] In the Spirit of Openness [1]
I'd like to propose to the Board that we move almost all talking to Board-L with the exception of the following items. Items to be Discussed on Exec: 1. Grievances brought by members through their elected representatives 2. Complaints about sites - so as not to injure the reputation of the CC whose site is being complained about 3. Notices to fellow Board members of being out of town - protection from folks who might be looking for 'I'm going to be out of town messages' so as to select one's property fo
24. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25 vote [1]
Yes. Tina Vickery NE/NC County Coordinator Representative
25. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-25-B [1]
Welcome Ed. Tina Vickery
Viewing 1-25 of 138 matches from 36,123,953 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.519922