Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:carrico-dna
Viewing 1-25 of 224 matches from 36,069,978 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next
1. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] Pherrel / Pherril must be Farrell [1]
It turns out Pherrel is Farrell, and once I started searching on "Farrell LITTLETON," I picked up some information that will at least be a consolation to those with the LITTLETON NPE. It turns out, Farrell LITTLETON was Overseer to John Augustine WASHINGTON, brother of Pres. George WASHINGTON. Now, an overseer can be seen as a plantation manager, but in the South, that mainly meant he was the slave manager. Still, he was working for some mighty high-powered land owners, although none of them would hav
2. [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Hello List, We have first results returned for #132113, the descendant of Charles CARRICO of Sullivan Co., IN. Actually, nearly all of his results have returned (viz., Markers 1-25 and Markers 38-67), the only panel remaining is the one that usually seems to be last, Markers 26-37 (expected 12/19). His results came as an unpleasant surprise, because he is not Haplogroup J2a1b, as are the tested descendants of Peter CARRICO, 1674 immigrant to Maryland. He is Haplogroup R1b1b2: http://dgmweb.net/genealog
3. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Well, just wondered if it was like mixing up 2 tubes of blood in the lab and the results for both individuals were incorrect of the mix-up. Hmmm, but I guess if we get notice of some weird line connecting closely to our Carrico's, that might be a heads up that a mix-up occurred? Meanwhile, I'm sure you're disappointed, but it seems you're going about it right. Just because this 6th generation (per your website) doesn't match, doesn't mean that another descendant of Charles won't match. I can't imagine
4. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
How odd. I posted the message backquoted below at 8:20 pm, before the message I posted at 8:48 pm. The latter/later message arrived on the list at 8:49 pm, but the earlier message didn't arrive until 12:33 am. Sorry that the messages didn't make sense arriving in that order. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: carrico-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 8:20 PM > To: carrico-dna@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for
5. [CARRICO-DNA] Charles CARRICO s/o Pherell LITTLETON? [1]
Some of you may recall that #132113, the descendant of Charles CARRICO of Sullivan Co., IN, apparently has an NPE in his lineage because he doesn't match the CARRICOs who presumably descend from Peter CARRICO I. You may also recall that he does have a significant match (62/67) with one other person: a LITTLETON (#89853). I have now been in contact with the wife of the LITTLETON, and she has kindly shared his lineage with me, so I have added it to the results page: http://dgmweb.net/genealogy/DNA/Carrico/
6. [CARRICO-DNA] Results for New Member (#136280), a desc/o Abel I with a surname change to BLAINE [1]
Hello List, We have a new member (#136280), with his first and final results (12 markers) returned. He is an unsual subject in that his line experienced a deliberate (and documented) surname change from CARRICO to BLAINE. He is a paper descendant of Peter I's son, Abel I, and his test results confirm that he is, indeed, a genetic CARRICO: http://dgmweb.net/genealogy/DNA/Carrico/CarricoDNA-results-HgJ2.shtml#J2a1b Diana
7. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
When the kits are sent out, the vials are already labeled with the kit number, so it's not possible to "mix up" vials. You'd have to deliberately peel off the (very stuck tight) labels and deliberately switch them. FTDNA has gone to considerable lengths to be certain there are no mix-ups. Our CARRICOs happen to be extremely distinctive genetically. Whenever someone is tested, we will know it immediately an unequivocally whether someone is or is not a match, as in this case. Getting an NPE is the begin
8. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] Final Results for #132113, R1b1b2 desc/o Charles CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Oops. I misspoke when I said I found no LITTLETONs in Indiana. I meant I found no LITTLETONs in *Sullivan County,* Indiana, not in all the censuses from 1820 to 1930. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: carrico-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:carrico-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Diana > Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:40 AM > To: CARRICO-DNA@rootsweb.com > Subject: [CARRICO-DNA] Final Results for #132113,R1b1b2 > desc/o Charles CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN > >
9. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] Charles CARRICO s/o Pherell LITTLETON? [1]
Well, here we go again. I sent this message at 3:32 PM on Monday, and it didn't arrive on the list until 2:53 AM on Tuesday *after* my own reply to it. I sent the reply at 4:19 PM on Monday, and it arrived at 10:30 PM on Monday, four and a half ours before the message to which it was a reply! So, I'm sorry that the reply arriving first means it couldn't have made sense. If the chatter on LISTOWNERS-L is any indication, other admins are experiencing the same, including even longer delays between the time
10. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Hello Linda, I'm afraid it's very unlikely that there was a mix-up. The most immediate thing we could do is retest him or test his father or a brother. However, given that his result is probably not a mix-up, it makes more sense to spend the money testing cousins. If any of them match him, we know his result was not a mistake. If none of them do, then we can look at testing someone who is closer to him or retesting him. I didn't spend any time looking into this LITTLETON because he may turn out not to
11. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Oh, now I've been asked the question on the list. Well, you have the answer to your question already, so I'll respond to your statement. If you trace your ancestry through Charles, your being a biological CARRICO is now in question, as is mine. Everything now depends on where (in which generation) this mutation took place. This test subject's line is: Charles CARRICO & Martha REASON _Reason CARRICO & Elizabeth ENGLE __William G. CARRICO & Susan SMITH ___George Harrison CARRICO & Rachel COX ____William
12. [CARRICO-DNA] Final Results for #132113, R1b1b2 desc/o Charles CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Hello List, We have the final results returned for #132113, the descendant of Charles CARRICO of Sullivan Co., IN, the one who has an NPE in his lineage: http://dgmweb.net/genealogy/DNA/Carrico/CarricoDNA-results-HgR1b.shtml He has a 62/67 march with a LITTLETON, so it appears he may really be a LITTLETON. I don't have this LITTLETON's lineage, yet, so we don't know whether these specific families crossed paths or not. I haven't found any LITTLETONs in Indiana, so sadly it's looking like this NPE may ha
13. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Someone has asked me offlist what "NPE" means. My apologies. I usually define it the first time I use it in a message. It means "non-paternal event," which is either an adoption or illicit paternity (adultery on the part of a wife) in the person's patrilineal line. I discuss the NPEs that I've found in my projects and the degree to which they've been resolved on this page: http://dgmweb.net/genealogy/DNA/NPE_Resolutions.shtml Again, sorry, Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: carrico-dna-bounc
14. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Diana, Is it possible that there is a mix-up with the results? You're website mentions that the DNA matches with a Littleton in the FTDNA database whose results aren't yet complete either. The results to the Littleton DNA at http://www.familytreedna.com/public/littleton.project/ isn't public, but there is some info. on the alternative site which doesn't look like it's been updated since last October. There is another Littleton there, last on the list kit # 89853 who seems a close match with the desc
15. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
I am offering to pay half the cost of a 12-marker test for one of each of the four cousins mentioned below as being in need of testing. Test subject must be a male surnamed CARRICO and must share his genealogy in sufficient detail that I'm convinced he is one of these cousins. If you qualify and are interested, please contact me privately, offlist. Basically, I'm offering to chip in $50 toward the price of a test. If you have any thoughts of taking your testing to the full 67 markers, this is the time t
16. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113, desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN [1]
Hello, I would like to ask a question. What does "NPE" mean? I too trace my lineage through Charles. Jeanne Murphey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" To: Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 2:42 PM Subject: [CARRICO-DNA] First Results for #132113,desc/o Chas CARRICO of Sullivan Co IN > Hello List, > > We have first results returned for #132113, the descendant of Charles > CARRICO of > Sullivan Co., IN. Actually, nearly all of
17. [CARRICO-DNA] Holiday Discounts expire tomorrow [1]
Just a reminder that the Holiday Discounts expire at midnight tomorrow. If you want to take advantage of them, please do so today -- not 11 pm tomorrow! Diana
18. [CARRICO-DNA] Pherrel / Pherril must be Farrell [1]
It just dawned on me that Pherrel/Pherril must be a phonetic misspelling of the English given name Farrell. This would be in keeping with the fact that LITTLETON is an English surname. Diana
19. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] Charles CARRICO s/o Pherell LITTLETON? [1]
I recently sent out a batch of messages and discovered that the smallest in size was sent first, instead of the order that they were written. Maybe it's the same ... I don't even pretend to understand it. Kay-- ~*~*~*~ -----Original Message----- From: carrico-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:carrico-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 4:22 AM To: carrico-dna@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [CARRICO-DNA] Charles CARRICO s/o Pherell LITTLETON? Well, here
20. Re: [CARRICO-DNA] #86809, desc/o Peter CARRICO, takes Kittler test [1]
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear. Member #86809 has already tested his 67 markers. The Kittler test was an additional test, to determine the order of markers 385a and 385b. What I'm recommending is that no other descendants of Peter CARRICO need to take the additional Kittler test. That doesn't mean I'm recommending no one else test their 67 STR markers. Just the opposite. I wish every male CARRICO would get tested to 67 markers. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: carrico-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com
21. [CARRICO-DNA] anonymous donation [1]
Hello List, The CARRICO project received an anonymous donation of $100 on June 19th. I want to express my great appreciation to the donor, with my pledge that the money will be used wisely to further the aims of the project. I used money from the General Fund to bring in the CARACO of Turkish origin, and I will continue to empasize using the money for bringing in others with known Old World origins. Again, thank you! Diana
22. [CARRICO-DNA] #86809, desc/o Peter CARRICO, takes Kittler test [1]
Hello List, Member #86809, one of the descendants of Peter CARRICO, the 1674 immigrant to Maryland, has undergone a Kittler test to determine the actual order of the alleles at marker 385a-385b. http://dgmweb.net/genealogy/DNA/Carrico/CarricoDNA-results.shtml#J2a1b Standard testing does not reveal the order of this pair of alleles; and, by convention, they are reported "low-high." A Kittler test will determine the order of these alleles, and it turns out they actually are "low-high" (i.e., 12-17, not
23. [CARRICO-DNA] New member #94500, a CARACO with an origin in Turkey [1]
Hello List, We have a new member, #94500, an American CARACO whose great-grandfather, Albert CARACO, was born in Bursa/Brusa, Turkey: http://dgmweb.net/genealogy/DNA/Carrico/CarricoDNA-results.shtml#New These CARACOs are Sephardic Jews. Their surname is mentioned in an article about Brusa at the Jewish Encyclopedia web site: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=1539&letter=B There is a Rabbi Avraham CARACO who was the first Sephardic rabbi in Los Angeles, but it is not known whether he's r
24. [CARRICO-DNA] What is the likelihood that CARRICO is Jewish? [1]
Bonnie Schrack is the administrator of the Haplogroup J project at FTDNA. She has given me blanket permission to forward messages from her, and I thought this one would interest you. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: genealogy-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com On Behalf Of Bonnie Schrack > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:00 PM > To: Genealogy-DNA-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [DNA] modal values for markers 38-67 for haplogroup J2 > > > Diana wrote: > > > > One question my members are asking me is the pr
25. [CARRICO-DNA] #86809 has "advanced" STR results returned [1]
Hello List, We now have all the "advanced" STR test results from FTDNA returned for #86809, the descendant of Peter CARRICO through his son, Abel CARRICO: http://dgmweb.net/genealogy/DNA/Carrico/CarricoDNA-results.shtml#J2a1b-Advanced These are the STR markers that FamilyTreeDNA (FTDNA) added to their offerings when they purchased the German company, DNA-FingerPrint (DNA-FP). At present, only some of these markers can be uploaded to Ysearch, but FTDNA will likely make all of these markers uploadable ev
Viewing 1-25 of 224 matches from 36,069,978 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.449932