I second that opinion
Be what you is, not what you
aint, 'cause if you ain't what
you is, you is what you ain't.
- Luther D. Price
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy Paterson"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 4:00 AM
Subject: Re: [R-M222] NPE Frequency
> >
> History suggests that Scots clans seldom agree on anything.
>>
>
> The one exception that I can think of is that they believe their whiskey
> is
>
In a message dated 12/6/2008 12:26:30 P.M. Central Standard Time,
equisand@equiformratings.com writes:
If this is so, and my understanding that M222+ is a 'child' of L21+ is
correct, this would seem to imply that M222+ almost definitely arose in
Ireland, sprung from L21+.
They've been arguing on the GEN-DNA list for the last month about where L21
originated. Some claim Ireland; some claim the Celtic fringe of the British
Isles in general; some say the continent. I don't think anyone knows for
>
History suggests that Scots clans seldom agree on anything.
>
The one exception that I can think of is that they believe their whiskey is
superior to Irish whiskey.
I disagree completely. Bushmills makes a blend called Black Bush that is in
my opinion superior to anything my Scots brethren are capable of producing.
As for what passes as whisky in the USA, I think silence is appropriate.
Sandy
-----Original Message-----
From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com
[mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com]
Wow.
I'm sure you'll find it acceptable if I answer you piece by piece.
1. How do we know which McDonalds they are?
The best is to read what they say on their website. Their admission criteria
are by far the most detailed I've seen on any site. I recall reading for
example that only Dunleavy's from (such and such a place) are part of the
McDonald Clan and that Dunleavy's from (elsewhere) are not. Unfortunately
their Home Page is inoperative at the moment so I can't give you the link
but I'll do so when i
In a message dated 12/2/2008 4:55:40 A.M. Central Standard Time,
equisand@equiformratings.com writes:
It would be far more convincing to take whatever M222+ is present in a group
and to use that to check the plausibility of a pedigree claim by comparing
it to the M222+ DNA of the grouping from whom descent is claimed.
Isn't that exactly what we've been doing?
And whom do you find as the closest relatives by pedigree to the Anradan
kindred? O'Neills and McLaughlins. Not just any McLaughlins but
>
For me that's one of the huge problems of attempting to link surnames to
known clans. You almost have to go into the old territory itself to get
DNA
samples with definite locations, from people whose ancestors have lived
there as
long as they can remember. If you want to get a handle on Maclachlan of
Argyllshire DNA go to Argyllshire for your samples, not Edinburgh or
Galloway.
If you want to find Maclochlainn of Donegal go to Donegal.
We've attempted to do this in our McLaughlin DNA proje
Hi Paul
I think I should re-phrase something.
It's probably better to say that you are 'less far from' (L21+,M222-) than
most of (L21+,M222+) rather than 'nearer to'. I did manage to find some L21+
haplotypes that you seem closer to than some M222+ haplotypes, but not many.
I'd be more convinced though if we could find some haplotypes that look like
M222+ but are SNP tested (L21+,M222-).
My own SNP results are due soon. Who knows?
Sandy
-----Original Message-----
From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@root
I've been following the discussion with interest, since it deals with
questions that have been in my mind for a while now.
John McLoughlin said that if the genealogies in O'Clery are correct,
every McLaughlin in Inishowen in the 17th century should have been descended
from a single son of Domhnall Mac Lochlainn. But should this really be so?
It seems reasonable to think that the larger and more powerful the clan, the
greater the proportion of members who are not patrilineal descend
Hi John
>
There are some things I don't respond to
either because I have no real position one way or the other or I think
someone else might respond. I think what you're referring to though is
the following:
"This seems quite relevant to me in considering for instance the DNA of
purportedly Dalriadic descendants. In particular, the roughly 10% R1b1c7
found in Clan McDonald would seem to be about what one would expect if
they were originally R1b1c7."
>
No, that's not what I'm getting at at all. I used
You're probably right about that, Sandy. I see that they all vary at most
by 1 at one marker, except for Mr. Sanderson and me, who differ from the
modal by two.
R.C.
Hi R.C.
I'd like to read your posting a few times before perhaps asking a question
or two.
In the meantime though,
>
Someone, I don't recall if it was John or Sandy, spoke of 10% of the Clan
Donald results being R1b1c7; I don't think that's quite right. Of the
677
participants, about 60 fall in the green subgroup of R1b, and of these,
all
of us who have been SNP tested (and this seems to be fewer than a dozen)
are
M222+ .
>
Yes, it was I. But you have me a little puzzled. Isn't 60 about 10
As to Paul Conroy's post: yes, of course.
As to John Mclaughlin's post: Thank you. I think we are on the same page,
now. Maybe the Ewing cluster dates from the 15th century, for all I know,
but I think 16th century is more probably right.
David Ewing
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Ferguson"
> Related question: what is the modal Kittler test for R-M222?
If it is not high/low 13-11 that would be most interesting (not expected).
I hope someone from M222 has done a Kittler and can give us the answer.
Hi John
>
The traditional pedigree of the McDonalds has them descend from Colla Uais,
one of the probably mythical founders of the Irish Airgialla. Sellar
argued
that the pedigree, which all authorities acknowledge is too short by
multiple
generations to be historically accurate, is just a "pointer" pedigree to
the
northern Ui Meicc Carthainn of the Irish Airgialla. His theory was widely
accepted until DNA testing came along. Remember the McDonald clan's Colla
Uais modal of a few years ago?
In a message dated 12/1/2008 1:21:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
davidewing93@gmail.com writes:
I have argued in a number of posts that we should be careful of looking for
ethnic, racial or tribal characteristics on the basis of genetics in men who
have been tested and found to share a haplogroup subclade. I don't recall
ever seeing a post saying anything like "there is [no] tribal basis for DNA
whatsoever." This makes me worry that John has misunderstood my point, and
if he has, practically everyb
Hi R.C.
Right I'm with you now.
If you have a look at the haplotypes in the Green group you'll notice that
the vast majority of them are 15,16,16,17 at DYS 464 a,b,c,d
Those that aren't are very close.
That's a dead giveaway for M222+ so you can be fairly sure that they're all
M222+ regardless of whether they've had an SNP test. That's probably why
they've been grouped together.
Sandy
-----Original Message-----
From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com
[mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf
>
The McEwans of Scotland are an old clan. That they once existed as a
recognizable Scottish clan is attested to by the quote from Skene which
accompanies
their pedigree in the Gaelic MS. 1467.
Note(7): "On a rocky point on the coast of Lochfine, about a mile
below the church of Kilfinan, is to be seen the vestige of a
building called Caisteal mhic Eoghuin or M'Ewen's castle. This
M'Ewen was the chief of a clan and proprietor of Otter."-
Stat. Acct. vol. 14, p. 259. From the genealogy, this tr
You Will Find M222 Ashley's on almost all of the Following FTDNA Project
research .Keep in mind other research company's have M222 listed a little
differently Gene
_ISOGG 2008 Y-DNA Haplogroup Tree_ (http://www.isogg.org/tree/) ,
_Eupedia : Geographic spread and ethnic origins of European haplogroups#J_
(http://www.eupedia.com/europe/origins_haplogroups_europe.shtml#J)
FTDNA _R1b1c7 Project Research_ (http://clanmaclochlainn.com/R1b1c7/)
M222 (R1b1c7) Project Research
Research
>
In Ireland we often see large concentrations of a given surname in certain
counties or adjacent counties. Mostly these follow the old territorial
locations for an Irish sept. If you look at the Griffith's Valuations for
the
surnames Doherty or McLaughlin you'll find by far the largest concentration
of
both surnames occurs in Donegal, Tyrone and Londonderry, The points of
heaviest concentration can be astounding. There are something like 2,000
Dohertys
listed in the Griffith's in Donegal
>>The 66/67 match includes the very unusual combination of 26,14 at DYS
481,487. There are only two participants in the M222+ project that have
that combination, namely myself and a GILLESPIE. <<<
This is GILLESPIE DNA GROUP 5.
There are 9 kits in this group and four have upgraded to 67 markers.
All claim Ireland/Ulster as their starting point before arriving in
America. One family group arrived in the early 1700s and we have a
document that cites Ireland, but no specific location. We assume Ulster.
On
In a message dated 12/2/2008 4:02:11 A.M. Central Standard Time,
equisand@equiformratings.com writes:
David Ewing, in a posting sometime in the past two days, raised the point
that some NPE's would result in an unchanged family haplogroup, which is
perfectly logical.
So in your example of the Doherty's with 68% still being R1b1c7, a goodly
bit of that 68% would probably represent NPE's where the natural father was
also R1b1c7, thus leaving the family haplogroup intact.
That is perfectly true. Yo
John Laughlin said, "For those on this list who don't believe there is any
tribal basis to DNA whatsoever I would advise concentrating on a known part
of Ireland (Donegal) where the leading chieftains are well known from
history."
I have argued in a number of posts that we should be careful of looking for
ethnic, racial or tribal characteristics on the basis of genetics in men who
have been tested and found to share a haplogroup subclade. I don't recall
ever seeing a post saying anything like "there is [no
It seems a European panel of judges will rule today on an interesting case
involving DNA. It seems two people who were arrested at some stage but were
not found guilty of anything want their DNA records wiped out. I think it's
a human rights thing.
According to an internet search I did the other day, the USA and the UK
combined have some 8m Y-chromosome haplotypes on record. I must say I'd like
to get my grubby hands on them.
Sandy
I updated some of the files on my M222/R1b1c7 site and eliminated others.
http://clanmaclochlainn.com/R1b1c7/
If anyone knows of any M222 or R1b1c7 links that might be of interest to
members of this list let me know and I'll add them too. I'm probably going
to be adding more documentation on Niall since that seems to be a popular
topic. If you've never read the original Trinity article on Niall you can
find it here.
John