Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:genbrit +(+date:sep +date:2002)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,563 matches from 36,113,247 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: Merchant Navy help [1]
"Phil Hawkins" wrote in message news:... > Thank you all for your input. I tried to do a google search again and was > still told there was no references. (Used caps, quotations etc)When I used > your links they worked fine. ??? > > snip > No need for quotes or caps with this one - just type in athenic to get some good links! Fiona
2. Re: American access to the GRO Indexes? [1]
I don't think that's accurate, the LDS hasn't filmed it, according to my Norwich, England genealogy source @ our FHC . Fortunately, a friend in NZ sent me the "lookups" I needed, I then had to send them to a "researcher" in London to have him get the certificates from the GRO. When I was inquiring about the GRO, the " genealogist from our library said that was the quickest way to get them. I have found out you can purchase fiche through your FHC , and have them remain @ your facility. I haven't used t
3. Malster [1]
Listed as occupation for a relative I have been searching for in Norwich, England. Also looking for a place to purchase an Oxford Dictionary. Noticed on the Lib. of Congress site there are many published. For my UK genealogy research what edition is "user friendly" ? Sincerely, Marge Fort Wayne, IN USA WRIGHT/GIDNEY families Norwich, England 1850 - 1900
4. Re: Arthur Yates [1]
John E Wynn wrote in message news:... > On 28 Sep 2002 02:37:52 -0700, edals@bigfoot.com (Gurslad) wrote: > > >Trying to trace Arthur Yates born 1st May 1921.He may have been born > >in Berkshire?.I have photo which has "Jerome" printed on back.It is a > >posed photo so Jerome is a photographer of that time.Maybe Reading. > > If you mean Arthur Ernest YATES born 1 May 1921 I can tell you when he > died. You should be aware that th
5. Re: Are the Eliots of Cornwall related to the danish/norwegian family Ely? [1]
Eve McLaughlin wrote in message news:... > In article <3d820a53.4346234@news.online.no>, "Johs. Mjelde" > writes > >On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:30:51 +0200, "Lesley Robertson" > > wrote: > > > > > >>I wasn't aware that Catholic Bishops were allowed to have families. > >> > > > >No, I understand that they were not supposed to have sons, at least > >legitimate sons. But they might have brothers, and t
6. Re: Yates Family of Reading [1]
jcmclean@sprint.ca ("Joanne McLean") wrote in message news:<009201c26884$6a1618c0$36496395@oemcomputer>... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Will Howells" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:50 AM > Subject: Re: Yates Family of Reading > > > > In article <479be3ea.0209290119.79a50d0@posting.google.com>, > > edals@bigfoot.com (Gurslad) wrote: > > > > > Looking for info on the Yates Family they are:- > > > John Yates b 1847 Burton on Trent
7. Re: 1891 Lookup please [1]
A look up for the 1891 census is not by name. East Stepney is not enough. If you can give a street, then I am willing to look up for you. Regards Rena McKenzie
8. Re: Yet another query on the 1901 census [1]
Osiris wrote: > Having checked the 1901 census for my great grandfather I > can't find him or his wife,On their wedding cert of 1900 he > is listed as a fisherman and being as he was born and lived > in Gt Yarmouth. It may be a silly questiuon, but you have looked for first name and date macthes without the surname? The transcription of the handwritting has been pretty questionable at times. I found "Cleavers" as "Cleaves" and even a professor was transcribed as a "prope
9. Re: DEVON MILITIA [1]
thanks again for the information, at least one devon militia was around...I have relatives at time in Frant, but from another branch. He wouldnot have been married at that time...thanks...
10. Re: 1901 Census test page URL??? [1]
G'day On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 7:12 PM, Barry Ruck wrote: > >Other than the large number of Session Timeout Errors, Is that not related to the 2hr limit set for any one session? I have had no problem with time outs, except when I left the connection running and unused. Eric Youle, Mooloolaba, Queensland <<<<<<<<<<<< Genealogical databases & Sheffield Local History material @ Family Trees - Youle, White
11. Re: Which software do you use? [1]
In article <3d930cc4$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>, Broxie wrote: >I have been using Brothers Keeper for a while, currently on version 6, but >there are a few things I don't like about it. Presentation of data and >ability to search is very basic and it is easy to overtype details in error >(say trying a name search). There is no undo or back key or "Are you sure >you want to make this change" button and so I spend some time correcting my >own mistakes etc. > >What is the
12. 1901 / 1881 Census fun and games [1]
FamilyNet Newsgate Gerbil wrote in a message to All: G> From: HartleysXB@yahoo.com (Gerbil) G> Hi! G> A friend and I are trying to trace her family back (surprise!) and G> we've hit a couple of problems that I don't know how to overcome. G> The first one is her great grandfather married Hannah Powers in 1912 G> in Ashtin Under Lyne in Cheshire. We've got the certificate which G> shows she was born in 1891 and her father was James Powers, who's G> profession was a Cotton Weavers Overlooker. In t
13. Re: The VALUE of the 1901 census? [1]
In article <3D7756AB.1F20D472@paranor.ch>, Alan Paterson wrote: > >I am a computer database programmer myself. It is quite correct that a wildcard >search on the first letter is technically difficult. > >The reason for this is that, in most relational database systems (oops the >buzzwords are starting already) quick access to particular datasets is aided by >something called indexes. > >For example if one has an index on (say) last name and inputs the character >string "ABCD*", t
14. Re: The VALUE of the 1901 census? [1]
What a load of whingeing poms. The site works very well and is a resource we have all being waiting for. It doesn't cost an arm and a leg either. Work out how much it would cost to get to the Public Record Office or even somewhere else which might have the fiche,if you happen to reside in the UK. If you live elsewhere, forget it. As for the #5 minimum charge and the 50 and 75 pence charges; even I can work out that it isn't beyond the wit of man to make up a number of transactions which total the minimum
15. Re: Born on High SEAS [1]
Brian (brifarrell@aol.com) wrote: > I have just found out, thanks to the 1901 census that my grandmother > was born on the high seas and not in Ireland as everybody believed. > Her father was a soldier but I previously looked in Army Births, > and found nothing. Where should I look now for her birth certificate? When we looked at my wifes family we found that her GGM had been born at sea and the practice appeared to be to register the birth in the next port of call. This may not be 100% true but there is a
16. Re: Are the Eliots of Cornwall related to the danish/norwegian family Ely? [1]
Mike Rogers wrote in message news:... > At the risk of being flamed for my ignorance in such matters, wouldn't > the Bishops of Ely in the Middle Ages have been Roman Catholic? Weren't > they supposed to be celibate? > A Bishop would have no children, to speak of. > Anyone could have been named after the town they came from. Many English > surnames are place names. > HTH Good point! If so that will eliminate one of the theories.
17. Re: .Some Parish Record gleanings. [1]
"Geoffrey Peacey" wrote in message news:... > Group. > > Thanks to all who replied to my EM (electronic message, as it used to be > called in years before the internet became so popular). > > All ye who commented on "ye" (meaning "the"), missed my point of the letter > e being above the letter y. I have realised since I was told off when at > school in Gloucester that "Ye olde . . . ." is rubbish. Generally speaking, a superscri
18. HILL, Blackheath London [1]
I am just starting to trace my family who were called Hill and lived in Blackheath in London I know that my Gf was called George Herbert Hill and lived there in 1913 and was atthat time the Worshipful Master of St. Johns Masonic Lodge No.1343. Any information would be very helpful. Pat Larke Please e-mail Pat.Larke@btinternet.com
19. Jarrow, Durham [1]
FamilyNet Newsgate Jane Watt wrote in a message to All: JW> From: "Jane Watt" JW> I just found my great grandmother on the 1901 Census and she says JW> that she is born in Jarrow, Durham. I checked my gazetteer and can JW> only find a Jarrow in JW> Tyne & Wear. Did Jarrow use to be in Durham? Yes, before 1974 Keep well Steve Hayes WWW: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/steve.htm E-mail: hayesstw@yahoo.com FamilyNet <> Internet Gated Mail http://www.fmlynet.org
20. Crayston [1]
I am a Crayston born in France. GG grandfather was from Grimsby born 1885. Anyone there ? please e-mail Brunotigby@aol.com
21. Re **Ted Blind Item ** [1]
> > > > Think about this, the A list movie star is held hostage and under > house arrest by the producer for six months, they force him to pull > off all the PR stint and posing for filming all the fake scenes in > front of TV and magazines to tell the world that he is still > involved in the film which is due out this year and which of course > he isn't. With utmost disregard of his feeling, they imposes > enormous emotional strain and pressure on him and also re
22. Unsubscribe [1]
of on holiday
23. Re: fun with the 1901 for England [1]
In article , squealing@cap.hotmail.com (doff my cap to reply) wrote: >On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 Lesley Robertson" wrote: > >>Worc, Worcs, Worces, Worcr, Worcester, Worcesters >Also >Worsters. > >These are the odd "counties" I have found so far Are these in the "location" field, or the "where born" field? If the latter, then they could be genuine transcriptions of the enumerator's returns. Paul Bolchover
24. Re: The VALUE of the 1901 census? [1]
G'day Roy On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 8:22 PM, Roy Stockdill wrote: >Anybody who knows the first thing about transcribing and indexing >will tell you that the most common error is on the initial letter of >a surname. Now, there may perhaps be some technical reason why >Qineptiq couldn't manage to make the first letter subject to a wild >card search, but I cannot imagine what it is. However, I don't claim >to be a computer programmer, so perhaps someone who is can tell me. >I sus
25. York Assizes 1832 [1]
Can someone tell me where I can find info on a case tried at York Assizes on 17 March 1832? The case involved a Thomas Raine who was sentenced to Life and transported to Australia in 1833 aboard the vessel Mary. I would appreciate any help or suggestions offered. Kind regards Wendy in Australia
Viewing 1-25 of 2,563 matches from 36,113,247 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.579911