Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:genealogy-dna +(+date:aug +date:2001)
Viewing 1-25 of 365 matches from 36,113,247 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next
1. Re: [DNA] Human Genetic Diversity [1]
Here's at least a short article. http://www.sciences-et-avenir.com/archives/650/page64.html On Monday, August 6, 2001 8:10 AM, Michael Marcil wrote: >Hello! Those of you with experience setting up family DNA projects, I have >a question: Does anyone know of a site in French that describes genealogy >and DNA? Everyone with my surname is French-speaking, and I would like to >give them some information that will interest them and not scare them >away!!! > >Thanks! > >Michael >--
2. [DNA] mtDNA results [0.973139]
Hi all, I just got my mtDNA results from FTDNA, and I want to find out more. The result was 16126C 16163G 16186T 16189C 16294T and I was told I'm in haplogroup T. Is there a website I can visit to learn more about what this means? Thanks. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Andrews" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 4:59 AM Subject: Re: [DNA] Reading too much into it all > Hi Ann & All > > > I agree, with the proviso that your specific
3. Re: [DNA] Question on Mitochondrial DNA; thanks [0.973139]
So who does your legal research?! Just kidding. :) ---Original Message Follows---- From: JudyGlecer@aol.com ...but too lazy to research (chuckle). Warmest regards Judy E. Glecer, Esq. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
4. Re: [DNA] Croatian Medical Journal -- several articles online [0.973139]
Yes it is Ann. I read several - most intersting, I saved some for future enlightenment. The first article - they weren't as ignorant as we probably think back in the 1300's! Or put another way - just how far have we really come in many ways? Allan DNACousins@aol.com wrote: > > The April issue has several articles about forensic DNA analysis. Some of > them will be of interest to anyone who wants more technical details about > mtDNA and Y chromosome analysis. Isn't it amazing that we can find this stu
5. [DNA] Haplogroup T [0.973139]
Oxford Ancestors report on my mtDNA is haplogroup T with haplotype of 126(T), 163(A), 186(C), 189(T), 218(C), 294(C), and 296(C) for Cambridge Reference Sequence (CRS) 16001 to 16400. The female line lists from my mother, Louise Randall (Smith) Parker, back to Mary Elizabeth (Judkins) Smith, Mary Ann (Bartle) Judkins, Mary (Mitchell) Bartle, Elizabeth (Towells) Mitchell. Elizabeth (Towells) Mitchell was born in the late 1700s in Somersetshire, England. I would be delighted to hear from anyone who
6. Re: [DNA] Test Results [0.973139]
In a message dated 08/14/01 10:38:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time, trueme@webtv.net writes: > My concern after viewing a few online results is being able to > understand the > 'coding' --will there be a summery or explaination included? Will we > know > a percentage of American Indian (if in fact we are AI mix)? We've never seen an example of a BYU report, so we'll have to cross that bridge when we come to it. If their tests for your special report are limited to Y-line and mitochondrial DNA, that would
7. Re: [DNA] [0.973139]
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001 07:14:35 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: Hi, I'm new to this list. I'm list owner for severval surnames list at rootsweb.com I would like to approach DNA testing on my list but I don't knpw much about it I do know there will probably be a few for it a few against and a few who won't give a darn. Mainly Wilson-l Willson-L we all are at such dead ends. Do you have url's that I can research and just what is your ideas on how to start this thread on my list. Wilson's seem to have just popped ou
8. Re: [DNA] Latest News on the Stidham Study [0.973139]
In a message dated 8/11/01 5:55:32 PM, algleason@mlode.com writes: << You might want to read up on the treatment of European Jews during the Crusades, the Inquisition period and, of course, modern Germany, Russia, etc. I'm sure that not all Jews during those periods were willing to sacrifice the lives of their entire families including themselves for their faith. It often must have been a tough decision for them to make. >> I've exchanged a few e-mails with a gentleman in Jersalem who contacted me af
9. [DNA] Re: One Race (WAS Jewish and Arab DNA) [0.973139]
Assuming that the religious argument is true, that is, that we are all descendants of Adam and Eve, from the perspective of race relations, it isn't relevant. The net impact is that from a sociological and psychological standpoint, we feel most comfortable with those closest to us. That would be those individuals who in the PRESENT, are linked to us, not those from thousands of years ago. Just a thought and a different take on the discussion. Quite an interesting topic, I must say. "Leo K. Barton
10. Re: [DNA] Question on Mitochondrial DNA; thanks [0.973139]
In a message dated 08/22/2001 7:13:01 PM US Mountain Standard Time, DNACousins@aol.com writes: << Could a test be performed to determine descent or at least > whether we are related? Thanks. > No, mtDNA can be extracted from ancient remains, but this male would not have passed on his mitochondrial DNA to any descendants. The surname projects using the Y chromosome all use living people. >> Woops! The mtDNA may support evidence of a common female ancestor. For example the Iceman and Kat
11. Re: [DNA] H Haplotypes [0.973139]
Please remove ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:52 PM Subject: Re: [DNA] H Haplotypes > In a message dated 08/29/01 6:55:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > graces@qualitynet.net writes: > > > > Obviously there was enough for Oxford Ancestors (OA) to select a particular > > location in H for my wif'es mtDNA. > > Actually, I don't think they selected a "particular" location -- just a > location where the circle is small
12. Re: [DNA] CBS Sunday Morning Show August 12 [0.973139]
DNACousins@aol.com wrote: > > As of today, the CBS schedule for the Sunday Morning Show (August 12) still shows a segment on genealogy. The program notes don't specifically mention DNA, but Bennett Greenspan of Family Tree DNA was interviewed for the show. This is their present layout for the Sunday Morning Show on genealogy. Take a look -- if you are an early riser. http://cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,305893-412,00.shtml Allan
13. Re: [DNA] Common Ancestry; still not possible [0.973139]
Y chromosomes are inherited ONLY from male to male; never through females, so that NO offspring from the illegitimate female would have the Y chromosome from the putative father. OR, am I missing something here in this story? Jim ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:34 PM Subject: Re: [DNA] Common Ancestry > I think what Barbara was saying, was to use the Y chromosomal test on her > male cousins, who are the grandsons of the illigimate female, (through her > sons) and compare it
14. Re: [DNA] Re: Y-Line Signatures [0.973139]
In a message dated 08/25/01 7:21:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time, RLSteadham@aol.com writes: > Notice that "Lucas 2" has a one-step mutation at Locus 6 and "Benedictus 2" > a > one-step mutation at Locus 12, yet our traditional genealogical > documentation > prooves we descend from a common male ancestor (Timen Stiddem) at most, 10 > generations back. > Interesting -- when we talk about the chances of differing at two loci, I never really considered your scenario. If Lucas 2 and Benedictus 2 were the
15. [DNA] BYU, Indians, Oxford, etc. [0.973139]
BYU and Oxford response: I really am not sure what the BYU study is about, but the ad I originally saw for it was misleading and said you could learn about your ethnic roots by participating. This is only true in the most general sense and will not be available for years in the future. The Oxford study gives you results in a few weeks, but as a list member pointed out, gives you only the most ancient of hints about ethnicity. In my family we had the Indian story, but no three brothers story. I have been
16. Re: [DNA] Common Ancestor [0.973139]
I would like to thank everyone that responded to my inquiry on the Common Ancestor(gggrandfather). I thought that is was not possibly but I had to ask the question of others that know a lot more than I do about DNA. I really appreciate the ones that responded via the list and also others that responded directly. Thanks a lot, Dick
17. [DNA] Common Ancestry [0.973139]
I often thought of how to approach a branch of our family, that we are positive links up to us. So, your information is very informative here. Thanks! I'd think one would need to sit down and plan out the whole proposal before even approaching them. You'd almost have to be a salesman in a chequered suit. I often thought that the/any samples sent to the Lab for DNA analysis, need not have an individuals[cousins] name attached to them. Simply a "Code" number. This would be a good selling feature, to convinc
18. Re: [DNA] Re: GENEALOGY-DNA-D Digest V01 #239 [0.973139]
In a message dated 08/31/01 5:42:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, LCFAVOR1@aol.com writes: > > http://members.aol.com/dnacousins/mtdna-apt.pdf. > > > > Ann, I get the message "Sorry we can't find that page." Is there another > URL > I might try? > It worked OK this morning this morning, so maybe you could give it another shot. I did notice that the URL has a period at the end, which should not be included in your copy-paste operation. I often put URLs on a separate line to make it easier to copy, b
19. [DNA] More on Jewish DNA [0.973139]
I found a couple of interesting articles about DNA and Jewish genealogy at the online Jewish weekly "Forward." http://www.forward.com/issues/2001/01.08.17/genetic1.html and http://www.forward.com/issues/2001/01.08.17/genetic2.html Richard Steadham
20. [DNA] Croatian Medical Journal -- several articles online [0.973139]
The April issue has several articles about forensic DNA analysis. Some of them will be of interest to anyone who wants more technical details about mtDNA and Y chromosome analysis. Isn't it amazing that we can find this stuff online? http://www.cmj.hr/2001/4203/4203.htm
21. [DNA] DNA/Genealogy Websites in German? [0.973139]
Hi all, I have a request somewhat similar to one posted here yesterday. Someone with whom I may be distantly related (mid-16th century or earlier) in Switzerland is going to create a webpage inviting others to participate in a project to analyze Y-chromosomes in order to check for any relationship of those with Bricker/Brucker/Bruecker/ Brugger/Bruegger surnames. He'd like at least one hyperlink to another website in German explaining the logistics and results of other DNA projects of this sort. Does anyo
22. Re: [DNA] NancyS' MtDNA [0.973139]
With the caveats that I'm just beginning to learn about DNA and I have only read about Syke's book - not actually read it, I worry that Prof. Sykes may be causing more problems with his fanciful interpretations of pre-history than good. (Perhaps as I did with my Mi-Wuk Indian story on a much smaller scale.) It is my understanding that mtDNA, not being in the nucleus of the cell, has no effect on a person's genetics or health - if this is wrong, I'm sure I'll be corrected. Also, if the Portuguese sailor t
23. RE: [DNA] World Population Clock. [0.973139]
According to my calculations, in another 11,000 years the entire surface of the earth will be covered 17 feet deep in humans. Just think how hard that will make it to mow my lawn. Cheers, Gregg -----Original Message----- From: CWMeb@aol.com To: GENEALOGY-DNA-L@rootsweb.com Sent: 8/23/01 2:04 PM Subject: [DNA] World Population Clock. In a message dated 01-07-30 19:06:21 EDT, you write: << Looking at it in a different light, with today's population and Osaka's rate of 0.2% and the assumed starting pop
24. Re: [DNA] DNA analysis along the Silk Road [0.973139]
At 12:04 AM 8/30/01 -0700, Allan S. Gleason wrote: >A nice set of basic articles, Ann, >Do you know Wells since he's from Stanford - or is he always off into >the wilds? I came across Spencer Wells earlier and pretty much know which family he came from. So far I haven't gotten his attention for the Wells DNA study. He is located in England although he was born in the US and attended university here. I have been thinking of asking him for a hand to get my Wells collections in the UK. So far I haven't h
25. Re: [DNA] Re: Y-Line Signatures [0.973139]
In a message dated 8/25/01 6:53:56 AM, bmcceney@erols.com writes: << Usually 1 difference is enough to put the closest common ancestor back 25 to 40 generations ago. Probably too long ago to be able to associate surnames. >> Maybe, Maybe not. It would depend on the particular locus in question I would think. It's been pointed out earlier that some loci mutate at a faster rate than others. Look at the "Group 1" chart on the Stidham DNA results page at: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~tstiddem/Pages/r
Viewing 1-25 of 365 matches from 36,113,247 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.629904