Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:genealogy-dna +(+date:dec +date:2007)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,194 matches from 36,120,449 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: [DNA] Odd DYS464 results [1]
Ken wrote:- ~Any explanation from the testing company how they got a 15 and 17 from the ~reading? **************************************************************************** The testing lab originally stated 11,13,13,- and reviewing came back with 11,13,13,13,13. It was I that was expecting 13,13,15,17 as the rest of his markers shout Irish Type III. Reilly Ybase ID CIGZ1 The testing lab have never said there was a 15 or 17. Dennis W ***********************************************************************
2. Re: [DNA] Subgroups of R1b [1]
Nelda wrote:- ~Lindsey, ~the familysearch site has a way of guestimating counties in ~England, that a surname is more predominate in.. Check out via ~surname only the IGI listings. You have to view each one to insure ~it is a extraction from local records, then record the counties ~and years then look to see which has the most from what county the ~earliest.. that can give you an idea as much as anything can.. ~(infact you might even find your English links that way... but do ~not use member submitted as th
3. Re: [DNA] 23andMe - Phenotypes [1]
Ron, Thank you for doing this. I know it is a lot to ask but for any health problem they test for could you also include other associated SNPs that nether company tests? A column indicating if the SNP is known to be causative or is associative would also be helpful. Thanks, Rebekah
4. Re: [DNA] Odd DYS464 results [1]
We now have the electopherogram ... only two peaks and it is looking like 11,13,13,13. There is even the suggestion it could be read 11,13,13,13,13 that is 5 markers. Certainly not the 13,13,15,17 we were expecting. Dennis W **************************************************************** ~ ~Yes, I should have picked this up myself. I was just repeating DNA ~Heritage's explanation. ~We have requested, and DNA Heritage have promised to supply a scan of the ~electropherogram ... lets see what it shows. ~I
5. Re: [DNA] PLOS Genetics: admixture study of European Americans [1]
I think Lawrence is on the right track, though I want to amplify one train of thought. Y-chromosome and mtDNA haplogroups contain the history of that specific chromosome, not the entire person. Any attempt at describing how European a person or group of people is (and I don't stipulate that such a description is appropriate) cannot use Y haplogroups or mtDNA haplogroups. By way of example, my son has the same y-chromosome that my father has but shares only 25% of my father's ancestors. Any s
6. Re: [DNA] Subgroups of R1b [1]
I wrote:- ~Try John McEwan's listing ~ http://www.geocities.com/mcewanjc/p3modal.htm ~The 'R1b' section is well down the page. ******************************************************* Lindsay responded:- ~Now that I've seen this website, I have some questions. ~ ~First, why don't the subgroups listed here correspond with those I see ~discussed on the List? My family's subgroup of I1a doesn't appear ~to be included. ~ ~What do STR1, STR2, etc. mean when used as names of these subgroups? ~ ~I should perhaps
7. Re: [DNA] The DNA of Germany [1]
Similar articles make me crazy! Of course, one of Czech newspapers (quite serious) translated this article and added big title: "The Majority of Germans are Celts". They missed unimportant details about characterization of unique haplogroups and are using sentences like: "According to the genetic analysis, Only 6 percent of man inherited Germanic genes from paternal lineage, on the contrary 50 percent of women inherited them from maternal lineage." IMHO: Easy way how to transfer nice scientific results in
8. Re: [DNA] SMGF search engine [1]
Instead of using Safari as your browser, I suggest trying Firefox or Opera. Both browsers seem to handle SMGF's JavaScript more reliably, and both have the added benefit of being faster (by 70% or so) when running Dean McGee's scripts. Vince On Nov 30, 2007, at 9:56 PM, John Lerch wrote: > Has anyone who is running either Safari or Firefox on an iMac with > OSX 10.4.9 successfully run a search at SMGF since their new search > engine? I can jerry-rig a sequence of moves which will get me bac
9. Re: [DNA] Blood Types [1]
These links might help: http://www.bloodbook.com/inherited.html http://anthro.palomar.edu/vary/vary_3.htm Marie marianne dillow wrote: >As everyone on the list knows I am haplogroup H1a1. There was recent postings mentioning Blood Type B. > > I am A negative while my sister is O. We are the only children of our parents. Where does these blood types fit into origins , if at all ? > > Marianne Dillow > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GENEAL
10. Re: [DNA] Inbred lines of humans and the consequences [1]
> In my opinion, more appropriate terms in > discussing pedigree collapse in lieu of > the term "inbred lines" would be a concomitant > higher level of endogamy and consanguinity. > Ana Thanks; that sounds better but can't we just abbreviate that to CHLEC? I suffer from verbosity enough as it is. :-) Kathy **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
11. Re: [DNA] PLOS Genetics: admixture study of European Americans [1]
That's right. Beth Havelock Vetinari wrote: Actually that should be: By that definition, neither Native Americans nor Australian Aborigines are indigenous to the lands they live in. Regards, Paul D. On 12/3/07, Havelock Vetinari wrote: > By that definition, neither Native Americans nor Australian Aborigines > are not indigenous to the lands they live in. > > Regards, > > Paul D > > On 12/1/07, Beth Long wrote: > > Sorry, Paul, but the word "indigenous" refers to something which
12. Re: [DNA] mtDNA Haplogroup H Subclades [1]
In a message dated 12/13/2007 1:13:50 A.M. Central Standard Time, wlh@foothill.net writes: What happened to H1a ? Bill This is what the authors found -- presumably either all the H1a they found was H1a1 or it "fell back" into the H1* lump. I'd have to go look at the article again to see which was the case here, but my memory is that all the H1a there was H1a1. Whether to trust my memory is another question altogether :) **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
13. [DNA] R1b1c in Relation to the New Underhill and Kivisild Paper [1]
Vince wrote: I think that is the wrong takeaway. I see no reason to presume that all R1b1c folks will find themselves positive for all 27 SNPs. _____________________________________________________ Vince: If you look at the chart you will see a series of rs# SNPs situated between F and R1. This is a long list that gets you from point A to point B. The end product is R1. Similarly the 27 SNPs between R1 and R1b1c are those found between these two categories, but not downstream. Underhill a
14. Re: [DNA] GENEALOGY-DNA Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1992 678 markers [1]
I wonder what 678 markers were sequenced? _www.eurekalert.org/bysubject/index.php?kw=16_ (http://www.eurekalert.org/bysubject/index.php?kw=16) About the ancestors of Native Americans. About a DNA test for 678 markers. "The researchers examined genetic variation at 678 key locations or markers in the DNA of present-day members of 29 Native American populations across North, Central and South America. They also analyzed data from two Siberian groups. The analysis shows: o genetic diversity,
15. Re: [DNA] Has Anyone Heard Anything about Ancestry's Projects? [1]
Lindsey, I have to agree with everything you say! I prefer numerical myself and all the other comments. The projects were not up last time I looked, just individual pages....Oh life would be blessed if "THE COMPANIES " would allow you to enter every other companies marker results! I have created my own website for that. http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~bonsteinandgilpin/dna/dnaindex.htm and The Lost Colony Genealogy and DNA Research Group. http://www.rootsweb.com/~molcgdrg/surnames.htm but some
16. Re: [DNA] Jewish IQ and DNA [1]
Now that we've had our fill of pro-Jewish bigotry, how about some pro-German, pro-Dutch, pro-Polish bigotry? Or some anti-Bulgarian, anti-Romanian, anti-Turkish, anti-Serbian bigotry? http://www.news24.com/News24/Technology/News/0,6119,2-13-1443_1905267,00.htm l --- Germans are the most intelligent people in Europe, well ahead of the British (in eighth place) and the French (15th), according to a new study by Northern Ireland's University of Ulster, The Times reported Monday. With an average intelligenc
17. Re: [DNA] Degrees in Genetic Genealogy (studying designer drugs) [1]
Here's one sites def. of Genetic Counselors.... looks like they had adv med degree with some counseling exp. - I'll ask my genetic counselor when I go back to see her.
18. Re: [DNA] Scientific Papers on Haplogroup H and Subclades [1]
Hi Ian, Anne Nelson emailed me and said there are two written on haplogroup H since 2004 and will send them to me. I have forgotten the names. I believe they were written 2005-2006. I see you have one written in 2007 in your response. Thanks a lot. On H1a1, coding region mutation 6365C is the one that put me in that subclade. But I had FGS done and FTDNA put me in that haplogroup. I don't know about calling those on GenBank with this mutation a H1a1 or not. I wonder what haplogroup th
19. [DNA] Palindromic Testing for ht35 Haplotypes [1]
>From Italy DNA project website: http://italydna.blogspot.com/2007/12/palindromic-testing-for-ht35-haplotypes.html I've written before about my suspicions that a significant portion of the R1b1c in Italy may be an "eastern" variant of R1b1c called ht35. In short summary, the notion is that R1b1c originally arose in eastern Europe (perhaps Anatolia) and subsequently spread west into western Europe. The western spread of R1b1c is predominately marked by a TaqI 49a,f RFLP haplotype known as ht15 whereas in
20. [DNA] IQ testing and Sephardic v Ashkenazi intelligence [1]
Hi Ron, In fact, there have been a few tests (no where near the huge multi-country data base of Ashkenazim) of self-identified Sephardic Jews in Israel and the results suggest a far lower IQ, in the 90s on average. But I for one find the database too questionable to draw definitive conclusions. First, the sheer numbers of people tested are small. Second, the label 3Sephardic2 is sometimes attached to all non-Ashkenazi Jews, although some are more accurately labeled Mizrahi (so-called Oriental, or Middle
21. Re: [DNA] ?Welsh R1b1c7 subclade with DYS 389-1=14 [1]
Dear Larry, We are not talking about modern law in this case. Rhys ap Thomas (1449-1525) lived in the late medieval period. I will quote Griffith's description of his domestic situation: "As for Sir Rhys's children, they were conceived in others' beds. His extramarital relationships were pursed on at least two complementary fronts. Three of his mistresses lived reasonably close at hand in west Wales. Gwenllian, who may have been the first in a long line, was the sister of the abbot of Talley... nea
22. Re: [DNA] Ancestral haplotype - what is the source for use of themodal? [1]
Dr. Jim Wilson (Edinburgh University, also now associated with Ethnoancestry) is credited with coining the term "Atlantic Modal Haplotype 7 or 8 years ago - I have cut & pasted a post to this list from from Oct 2003 - > From: Patrick Guinness > Subject: [DNA] Atlantic Modal Haplotype (AMH) / first named... > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 08:02:43 +0000 > > At 1:41 pm -0700 10/10/03, Ron Lindsay wrote: > >Can someone point me to the first paper, written by a geneticist > >scientist, that
23. Re: [DNA] JIM BULLOCK -- Re: Please... [1]
Hi Ken, Try Google. Just run his name "Jon Entine". It's real, real simple. The results are quite instructive. Oh, and several other list members do concur with me. Salesman - period... Dale ___________________________________ Ken Nordtvedt wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dale E. Reddick" > > > Hello Jon, > > > You are simply a self-promoter attempting to sell your latest book. > > Most everybody on the list has figured this out..., so to speak. > > [[[[ You, Da
24. Re: [DNA] Novice question [1]
It is just the opposite. Fast moving markers are more likely to have parallel mutations, so are of much less use as branch tags. In fact, we have three parallel mutations on DYS439. In any case, possible branch tags should be evaluated in the context of a paper trail. Bob Stafford Gary Corbett wrote: You need to look at the fast-mutating markers.They are colored Red on the Results page if you are in a surname project. If all of your mismatches are on fast-mutating markers,that'
25. Re: [DNA] Ethnoancestry order [1]
David, You need to send EA an email about this. Since the only way you know if you have results is when they email you the email might have got caught in a spam filter. Gary Blakely -----Original Message----- From: genealogy-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:genealogy-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Doyle King Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 2:54 PM To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com Subject: [DNA] Ethnoancestry order I would hope that EA would complete their older test results before they take new on
Viewing 1-25 of 2,194 matches from 36,120,449 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.519921