Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:genealogy-dna +(+date:jun +date:2001)
Viewing 1-25 of 212 matches from 36,101,814 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next
1. [DNA] Fwd: Fw: Fwd: forward technical question [1]
For Gregg: >From: bcg@usernet.com >To: >Subject: Fw: Fwd: forward technical question >Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:50:52 -0700 > >Hi Aneita > >Here is the answer to the question posed to us a few days ago. > >Bennett > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: >To: "Bcg" >Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:54 PM >Subject: RE: Fwd: forward technical question > > > > Hi Bennett, > > > > I am assuming that this is actually addressing Y typing
2. [DNA] Mitchell dna test results [1]
The results are in on the first Mitchell dna test using the y chromosome to find out which Mitchells who had ancestors in North Carolina or Southside Virginia in the 1700s were related. There were many Mitchells in that area at that time and our assumption was that many of them would be found to be related. Of a group of ten, only four were found to be related. One was way off from all the rest, and the rest stood aloneno close matches with anyone. The next step in the project is to test more peo
3. Re: [DNA] Kincaid Surname DNA Project Plan [0.972571]
At 01:05 AM 7/1/01 -0300, Peter A. Kincaid wrote: >Someone has pointed out to me that, based on a show they saw on the >subject, assurances (even in writing) does not preclude a court issuing >and order to the lab to have the information released to them in relation >to lawsuits against a participant. If the participation identification is kept secure, I should think there would really be no way for the courts to even know a participant had been involved. Even so, the genetic information would be prett
4. Re: [DNA] Glennon Y-DNA Study Background & Design [0.972571]
Paula and List, I have included alternate spellings of Glennon in looking for the name in Irish historcal references and in looking for and responding to queries. I have not considered broadcast mailings to all people with the Glennon or similar names because I think the yield would be be very low. As it is, I have been discouraged by the low response from people who are supposedly interested in genealogy. I would like to know more about how to intrepret the DNA results that I will be getting. If all G
5. Re: [DNA] articles in Summer 2001 "New England Ancestors" [0.972571]
Alan, I did not learn much from the articles, although they were informative! Based on the reply below to the list, I am assuming someone is sending you the articles you asked for in your query to the List. "I have been overwhelmed by the number of kind offers to mail me copies. The only practical way to reply to thank you ALL for responding is via the main list." Chuck
6. [DNA] DNA/Internet Privacy, etc. [0.972571]
a) I think there is some chance that a few hundred years from now people will look back on us in amazement at our short-sightedness. It seems that a large proportion of our society is dead-set against using DNA technology for any purpose at all. These arguments come out when discussing human cloning. They seem to argue that we will end up with a bunch of Hitlers - never considering that the only way to get a clone that is Hitler would be to clone Hitler. I am not aware of anyone wanting to clone Hitler. Th
7. [DNA] Doniphan/Travers/Cave [0.972571]
Hi List, Does anyone know of any project which relates in any way to Alexander Doniphan? Does anyone on this list claim descent from anyone named Doniphan, Travers (Travis), and/or Cave? A descendancy of Alexander Doniphan project is absolutely MADE for molecular genealogy. He had three wives, two of them uncertain, and the other an ancestor of President Truman. He mentions in his will "grandson Giles Travers", yet nobody seems to be able to show in any convincing way how Giles could have been his grands
8. Re: [DNA] articles in Summer 2001 "New England Ancestors" [0.972571]
In a message dated 01-06-14 17:13:03 EDT, alan@savin.org writes: << Dear List, Is anyone willing to buy this issue or photocopy the articles therein and kindly mail them to me in the UK, in exchange for monetary recompense, a copy of my book or some other compensation? Thanks Alan >> Here is the URL for their web site: http://www.newenglandancestors.org/ Here is the web site for their magazine: http://www.newenglandancestors.org/nehgspubssection/pubs_nexus_highlights.asp You have to buy
9. Re: [DNA] Kincaid Surname DNA Project Plan [0.972571]
Peter, What exactly are they afraid of in respect of privacy? Probably some misguided notion of what your research will reveal, e.g. faulty genes when in fact you are only testing junk DNA? Maybe your (over?) elaborate privacy encodement has persuaded some that there is something really important that does need hiding, when in fact the information has no known medical importance. Alan Savin >Hello everyone! > >I am looking at getting a Y chromosone project going for the Kincaid >surname. >When I p
10. [DNA] Vitamin C and DNA damage [0.972571]
Listers: There is an article on page A8 of The Ottawa Citizen of June 15 entitled: "Vitamin C fosters DNA-damaging toxins, study finds". The article reports on research done by Dr. Ian Blair of the Center for Caner Pharmacology at the University of Pennsylvania. While the results relate specifically to cancer, is there any possibility that the genealogically important parts of DNA could also be affected? I am a genealogist who is very interested and enthusiastic about the potential for DNA research in famil
11. Re: [DNA] "U.S. Scientists Solve Texas Outlaw Mystery" [0.972571]
Is there some other manner to obtain DNA from the deceased? ----Original Message Follows---- From: DNACousins@aol.com ...they perpetuate the notion that exhumations are required to use DNA for genealogical purposes... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
12. Re: [DNA] A Very Grey Newbie [0.972571]
In a message dated 01-06-09 16:28:16 EDT, orwells@bigfoot.com writes: << and the second group just simply hate needles and are not going to participate in a study requiring blood samples. We may have to come back to these with another method. >> Why is blood being required? Regards, Bill
13. [DNA] Nature 1998 Foster et al Error ...? [0.972571]
Hello DNA Genealogists ... I remember someone (on this list?) mentioning one of the errors that was found in the Foster et. al., 1998 Nature publication. This was the study that provided 'suggestive' evidence that US President Thomas Jefferson fathered a child with Sally Hemings. The system DSY390 was given a repeat number of 11, which does not fall into the established allele size category (i.e., between 20 and 27 repeats). Does anyone know the actual allele size (or number of repeats), and where this inf
14. Re: [DNA] Barton Surname Project w/BYU [0.972571]
Ron They tell us that they will use about 15 markers. I am very new to this technical stuff. I will send this to a friend who has been helping us and maybe he can help. I think we just lucked out when we were accepted. I wrote their Special Projects people sometime in March. They originally said they were not accepting any new cases. About a month later they started asking if we were still interested. I am not a member so I don't think that had much to do with it. Can you think of some contacts where we co
15. RE: [DNA] virus hoax/For the Gullible [0.972571]
Normally, I do not make comment on "virus" stuff. I almost always just delete the e-mail, because I don't open attachments without being pretty certain that they are not viri. This is an exception. I received an e-mail from an "internet cousin" which did IN FACT contain a virus (as evidenced by my little note from Microsoft Outlooked saying it had been quarantined). I would not have opened it anyway, since the subject line was in special characters and something about it just looked wrong (and I have the p
16. Re: [DNA] Native American Surnames [0.972571]
Almost as soon as the Puritans set foot Massachusetts (an Indian name) they tried to assimilate and civilize the natives and established schools to Christianize them including giving them English names. The effort was quite successful until the population pressure caused by huge colonial families moved out into the Indian hunting and fishing grounds. The Indians were happy to sell their lands (they didn't know they owned them in the first place) but became upset when they learned they couldn't hunt and fis
17. Re: [DNA] Mitchell dna test results [0.972571]
My surname genealogy group and I are new at this we're about to be involved in setting up DNA testing for my surname, and I have a couple of questions.. Is the Y-chromosome DNA testing for only the male surname line? And, is the female MtDNA only for the female to female line? How about a male to female to male, then female for a couple more generations. Is there a particular DNA test for that is used for that type line, that will trace back to the original surname that we're trying to match? My situ
18. Re: [DNA] Glennon Y-DNA Study Background & Design [0.972571]
Hi, Why not extend your research to include other Irish names. You never know what might turn up. Through marrying, the name would change, but the genes would remain intact? Wanda Glennon/McNeil wrote: > Dear List, > > Ann Turner saw an announcement that I am starting a Y-DNA study of the > Glennon name and contacted me about subscribing to this list. I spent > a lot of time yesterday reviewing past postings. I have to say that I > am very impressed by the people involved and your knowledge of the >
19. Re: [DNA] Surnames, Genes and Genealogy [0.972571]
My copy of your posted URL had the "shtml" on the next line. Glad you pointed out that it required reattaching. I assume that the program series consists of the five 'programmes' itemized. If so, I copied them all for reading later since I prefer, rather than talk, either silence or background music (George Shearing for this English stuff). So if anyone has trouble hearing or reading the lectures, I have them. I also waded through the Pomeroy DNA Project and results - interesting. What a diverse surname
20. Re: [DNA] Mitchell dna test results [0.972571]
My surname genealogy group and I are new at this we're about to be involved in setting up DNA testing for my surname, and I have a couple of questions. Is the Y-chromosome DNA testing only for the male surname line? And, is the female MtDNA only for the female to female line? How about a line that consists of a male to female to male, then female for a couple more generations? Is there a particular DNA test that is used for that type line, that will trace back to the original surname that we're tryi
21. Re: [DNA] BBC "Surnames, Genes, and Genealogy" [0.972571]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/beyond/factsheets/surnames/surnames_home.shtml BBC Online - Beyond the Broadcast - Surnames, Gb
22. Re: [DNA] Bear DNA [0.972571]
Hunters are the reason I don't have a gun. AlG Linda Hedderman wrote: > I haven't had time to check this story out myself as I had a death in my > family. I just found it in a news newsletter I get and thought if you all > hadn't seen it or heard it on TV, you might get a kick out of it. And, > while it isn't genealogy related, it is DNA related. > > State Uses Bear DNA To Convict Hunter > http://treets.thepittsburghchannel.com/svc/lnk.cfm?l=4017620&t=1 > > ============================== > Search over 1
23. [DNA] Transcript of chat with Dr. Thomas Roderick [0.972571]
Tom Roderick was a guest speaker on the topic of "Genetics and Genealogy" at About.com on May 22, 2001. The transcript of the chat session can be found at http://genealogy.about.com/hobbies/genealogy/library/blchattrans-roderick.htm
24. Re: [DNA] Doniphan/Travers/Cave [0.972571]
In a message dated 01-06-15 02:18:28 EDT, gbonner@smhrimsx.mhri.med.umich.edu writes: << Does anyone know of any project which relates in any way to Alexander Doniphan? >> Have you had any discussions with Jim Burgess? << For the purposes I the DONIPHAN family the serious researcher should decide for himself. I am putting these families together as best I can with the information that I have available. I am ALWAYS interesting in what other information or opinions that others may have. Jim Burgess >
25. Re: [DNA] Glennon Y-DNA Project, Thank You [0.972571]
Yes, it is still necessary to ask Family Tree DNA for the actual number of repeats for the public STRs . And it is a public marker that is the one that has the one number difference between the two groups of Glennons in the first five returns. Clarke Glennon
Viewing 1-25 of 212 matches from 36,101,814 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.58991