Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:genealogy-dna +(+date:jun +date:2007)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,552 matches from 36,165,406 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [DNA] ¡ ¡ UPGRADES : So how can I get that test ? ! [1]
In reply to Bill, and ALL others who are intrigued by Ray Banks' wonderful work on Haplogroup 'G', AND want to upgrade their testing, here's how: First, you need your FTDNA Kit No. and Password or find the email from FTDNA announcing your test results. You use the former to login to your FTDNA personal page OR click on the link in the latter email that takes you to the same place. On the personal page is a grey left-margin column with a link labeled "Upgrades & Refinements", click on this. Next page, has
2. Re: [DNA] cat DNA study [0.968639]
Bonnie, I do not think you can own a cat. Rather they own you. I've had enough of them to know. But then you think they are descended from Old World Norwegian Forest cats? I think "evolved" to too strong a word in this instance, as there was hardly enough time for that. Adapted to the harsh conditions of rural New England might be more accurate. I take them as evidence of an early Viking presence in Vinland (North America). Eric > [Original Message] > From: Bonnie Schrack
3. Re: [DNA] DNAHeritage [0.968639]
Ken, The error was made by DNAHeritage while they were using their original unnamed lab. DNAH no longer tests for DYS425. They still will not tell me, or anyone else to my knowledge, which original lab they used or even where approximate it was, i.e., in the U.K., continental Europe, or the USA. I wanted to contact that original lab directly myself but DNAHeritage would not provide the contact information for that "secret" lab that they used. But they could correct the entry in their Oracle database
4. [DNA] EuroDNA 2.0 [was PubMed abstract: 10, 000 SNPs for European...] [0.968639]
Well, well, well -- this was quick! DNAPrint (Ancestry by DNA) just announced version 2 of its EuroDNA test, which uses 1,349 of the most informative SNPs from this paper (i.e. the SNPs with the biggest differences in frequency across various populations). I did wonder when I saw Shriver's name as a co-author whether DNAPrint would commercialize these SNPs. There's more information on the company website, including a link to the manual (very detailed -- I haven't read it yet): http://ancestrybydna.co
5. Re: [DNA] R1a1 in prehistoric Siberia? [0.968639]
That's quite interesting, Lawrence. The trouble with reading these papers is the inevitable desire to see more and the difficulty, if not impossibility, of finding the papers listed in the references. I don't suppose you have access to 'Clisson I, Keyser C, Francfort HP, Crube?zy E, Samashev Z, Ludes B (2002) Genetic analysis of human remains from a double inhumation in a frozen kurgan in Kazakhstan (Berel site, early 3rd century BC). Int J Legal Med 116:304-308', do you?! Thanks very much for the link.
6. Re: [DNA] Megalith Builders [0.968639]
Rich: The similarity lies in the fact that very complex subjects are distilled down into very simplistic, agenda-driven theories that appear to be based on little to no actual scientific studies, particularly DNA studies, though they are often completely bereft of archaeological data as well. I have no problem with theories, as long as they are put forth as such (and hopefully in an open-minded fashion) and not asserted as scientific truths that others must acccept, and if they argue otherwise, they are i
7. Re: [DNA] Pre-Germanic pre-Celtic peoples in Belgium/Netherlands [0.968639]
Fascinating link. It mentions the later encroachment of la Tene and Germanic peoples upon this earlier Nordwestblock. The unnamed authors of the Wikipedia article state that haplogroup I1c is high in this area. One of my ancestors, Steven Flanders, has a male line descendant ysearch T5JPR who is said to be haplogroup G. The region of Flanders is right in this Nordwestblock and I wonder if haplogroup G and haplogroup Ilc might both have been present in it in significant amounts. John Plummer
8. Re: [DNA] rare J2 haplotype in CARRICO Surname Project [0.968639]
Grandcross, OK, it wasn't a "challenge," you just disagreed with what I said. That's OK, people disagree on this list all the time. It makes for interesting discussions, not to mention learning something you didn't already know. I realize that some people are very uncomfortable when there is disagreement, as if this were a dinner party. It's not. This is list of researchers, and it's normal to present ideas and have them, well... challenged (if not shot down -- ouch!). That's how we advance. Ideas n
9. Re: [DNA] Question - need an expert... [0.968639]
Arch, I can tell you this much there are many different clusters with in a subclade. This is how I understand it.. a cluster is a grouping of haplotypes that has some type of commonality to it. Now, Please tell me if I'm wrong or right here ok?? Nelda Nelda's websites - http://freepages.folklore.rootsweb.com/~bonsteinandgilpin/ Remember me in the family tree, my name, my ways, my strife,then I'll fly upon the wings of time, and live an endless life..GOETSCH _________________________________________
10. Re: [DNA] Szekely DNA was R1b and I1a STR distribution comparison [0.968639]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Beth Long" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [DNA] Szekely DNA was R1b and I1a STR distribution comparison > Hi Rich, > > Do you mean they acquired second wives among the local population? Most > of them already had wives and children, and those single men tended to > select wives from among their own group. Why would they necessarily prefer > those of another culture?I know some love the theme
11. Re: [DNA] overlapping of family trees [0.968639]
>18th centry Germans from PA to the Shenandoah Valley is a subject of great >interest to me. >Do you have suggested reading? > >M Bowman Sorry, M, I don't. My German line went through the Valley to NC, then later to TN. This subject is on my to-do list, but not very high up. Bill Hurst
12. Re: [DNA] Y-DNA on Crete [0.968639]
On 6/13/07, ellen Levy wrote: > > Sasson: > > We know very little for sure, particularly when it > comes to remote time periods like the late > Paleolithic/Mesolithic or the Neolithic. You are > asserting your view as scientific fact ("what we know > for sure") rather than speculation; it is, in fact, as > speculative in nature as Paleolithic continuity > theory. When I say "we" I do not incluide the entire scientific comminity. Clearly I do not present my opinion as an agreed s
13. [DNA] Harrison [0.968639]
Hi Lindsey, Are you familiar with this line....the ancestry of Robert H. Harrison, Secretary to George Washington? All Maryland. =============================================== 1. Joseph Harrison m Eliz. Smith Joseph, Francis, Richard, Benjamin, Elizabeth, Katherine 2. Richard m. Jane Wade Joseph, Josiah,Thomas, Benjamin, Richard,Elizabeth, Tabitha 3. Capt. Joseph m. Verlinda Stone Richard,Joseph, William, Tabitha, Elizabeth. 4. Richard Harrison m. Dorothy Hanson Robert Hanson, William Hanson, Jo
14. Re: [DNA] PubMed abstract: mtDNA in Franch [0.968639]
Did anyone ever see the supplementary material? I went to the URL given in the article and didn't see anything for this study.... Anne ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
15. Re: [DNA] Identifying R1b clusters in Kerchner's R1b Project at FTDNA [0.968639]
Bud, Thanks for joining. I saw your join notice come in. Your data is now in the main Y Results table but will not be in the sorted tables until I update them. I do that about once or twice per month depending on how many people joined since the last sorted tables update. My project is now approaching 1100 members. And every day more and more members are upgrading to 67 markers. There are a lot of 67 marker upgrades in process now. Anyone who has been tested via FTDNA and/or the National Geographic S
16. Re: [DNA] Identifying R1b clusters [0.968639]
On 6/10/07, Ken Nordtvedt wrote: > I am surprised the South Irish clade did not pop out? 385 = 11-15, 391 = > 10, 439 = 11, 442 = 13, 447 = 24, 456 = 15, C4 = 24 I think it may have popped out, but only 4 of the 415 entries in that cluster, so it is kind of a small sample: http://coolohio.com/dna/r1b/clusX.jpg > Fluxus makes the branches between haps proportional to GD I believe. Did > you leave branch lengths alone, or did you stretch them in order to pull out > your identifie
17. Re: [DNA] Relatiegenetics? [0.968639]
I've never dealt with Relativegenetics, but I can tell you that FTDNA is wonderful. They are always prompt with their emails to me, and very nice. Susan From: Ncee To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com Sent: Friday, June 1, 2007 3:54:37 PM Subject: [DNA] Relativegenetics? Has anyone here dealt with Relativegenetics for DNA testing? I have been trying to contact them for nearly a week, leaving a number of voice mails as well as sending e-mail and can get no one to contact me.
18. Re: [DNA] Megalith Builders [0.968639]
Rich wrote: > Well, despite your somewhat caustic attempt to dismiss the correlation > between languages and y-haplogroups out of hand, such a correlation does > exist. The fact that it does is self-evident. You thought I was being caustic?? No, indeed. I was being extremely gentle. Most people have a soft spot in their hearts for swashbucklers. The fact is that a correlation is a quantitative relationship between variables attached to the same set of study objects, whereas what you are claiming is no
19. Re: [DNA] new Russian law prevents dna testing of Moscow cousin [0.968639]
Send the kit. Kits are cheap. What have you got to lose ? Bill -----Original Message----- From: genealogy-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:genealogy-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com]On Behalf Of Ray Vick Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:34 PM To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [DNA] new Russian law prevents dna testing of Moscow cousin Russian's view they postal system with suspicion. Many advise against sending anything of value through it. There are lots of groups that travel to Moscow in many cases
20. Re: [DNA] TMRCA Correction [0.968639]
Hello Didier, I have been collecting data for observed average haplotype mutation rate in surname projects for several years. Some interesting observations are being made such as the difference between the average mutation rate observed in the I1a haplogroup compared to the others observed in the project. See the project 37 marker histograms. Here is a link to my project: http://www.ystrlog.org/ Charles Kerchner Emmaus PA USA (P.E. Retired) Didier Vernade wrote: > Surnames are known to be 20 to 25
21. Re: [DNA] Pre-Germanic pre-Celtic peoples in Belgium/Netherlands [0.968639]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale E. Reddick" To: Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [DNA] Pre-Germanic pre-Celtic peoples in Belgium/Netherlands > Hi Folks, > > Nordwestblock description as found at Wikipedia. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordwestblock > > Dale _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Curious. A large part of that same region would have
22. Re: [DNA] [DNA meanings of Polish, Russian etc [0.968639]
Lets try this again! I have an great aunt who told the census that she was born in Poland. Her Ellis Island arrival record listed the exact city of her birth and its date. Today the town is in the Ukraine. When she did the census it was in Poland. When she was born the town was in the Kingdom of Hungary (Austrian Hungarian Empire to some). Because it is in the Ukraine now, for a while it was part of the Soviet Union. Poland did NOT exist from around 1790 to 1917 as a separate country. Those who repl
23. Re: [DNA] You heard it from Pravda first [0.968639]
Hmmh! I wonder about this announcement coming out now in relationship to the timing of the other announcement only a few days ago from the Russian government about not letting DNA samples out of Russia. Interesting. ;-) Charles DNACousins@aol.com wrote: > I bet this news was supposed to be embargoed until Monday, but I guess it's > Monday in Russia. > > http://english.pravda.ru/world/93482-DNA_tests-0 > > They got the hierarchy reversed, though -- Relative Genetics is a division of > Sorenson Gen
24. Re: [DNA] Megalith Builders [0.968639]
The Alan Foster paper I am referring to is at: http://www.worldfamilies.net/Tools/r1b_ydna_in_europe.htm Best wishes! Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "ellen Levy" To: Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 8:55 PM Subject: Re: [DNA] Megalith Builders Well, barely in Europe, or at least at the very most eastern edge. Some would consider this Asia, as it begins to edge up against the Urals. Not far, however, from the proposed region of origin for
25. Re: [DNA] Fwd: Re: Cooley [WAS Ken's Norwegian R1a haplotype] [0.968639]
Marianne, Are you saying that Ancestry removes some of the data from their online databank? I wonder why they would do that. Doris Alternate email: doriswh@gmail.com ----- Original Message ----- From: marianne dillow To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 1:14 PM Subject: [DNA] Fwd: Re: Cooley [WAS Ken's Norwegian R1a haplotype] I checked Ancestry and they have removed the Muster Rolls of the Rev War leaving only Rev War Pensions that were rejected. It was a promotiona
Viewing 1-25 of 2,552 matches from 36,165,406 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.669898