Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:ma-bay-colony +(+date:aug +date:2005)
Viewing 1-25 of 119 matches from 36,117,749 documents1 2 3 4 5 | Next
1. Relatives of early 1700s Hendrick in SC [1]
Looking for relatives of early 1700s Hendrick in SC area of St Barthlomew's Parish, St. Paul's Parish and Christ Church Parish, St Helena's Parish in old Granville, Colleton and Berkley Co., SC. A connection to the Loyde Family in 1720s in SC via John Hendrick as exor of estate reveals Hendrick and Loyde Families of County of Devon, Salcome Parish, United Kingdom. At least one of this group is found in Georgia in the 1790 reconstructed census of GA. A number of land deeds shows family still in SC in the
2. Ship: The Lion ~ Journal of John Winthrop 1630 to 1649 [1]
Subject: Ship - Lion Source:The Journal of John Winthrop p.27 June 12, 1630 - Saturday About 4 in the morning we were near our port. We shot off 2 pieces of ordnance and sent our skiff to Mr. Peirce, his ship*50 which lay in the Salem harbor. About an hour after, Mr. Allerton came aboard us, in a shallop as he was sailing to Pemaguid. As we stood in the harbor, we passed through the narrow strait between Bakers Island and Kettle Island and came to anchor a little within the islands. footnotes: footn
3. RE: [Ma-Bay-Colony] James Torrey & Elizabeth Rallings/Rawlins. [1]
For your interest: I have James Torrey who m. Elizabeth Rawlins (Jun 1661- 7 Apr 1700) dau of Nathaniel Rawlins and Lydia Silvester
4. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Well,Maine---STEVENS....MERRIFIELD.... [1]
In a message dated 8/17/2005 6:33:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, Bunnydust@comcast.net writes: The book I have been transcribing does not go beyond 1700....... - Maine was still part of Massachusetts in 1799 (until 1820) - historical society in Wells The Historical Society of Wells & Ogunquit maintains this Nationally Registered Museum at the site of the original meeting house, located on Route Try http://wc.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=haruspex He has MANY Wells family lines not all his own, just a We
5. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Winthrop Book [1]
In a message dated 8/1/2005 4:03:15 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, Farns10th@aol.com writes: Thanks. I just instructed the owner of my pages to remove the book. She could be sued and has a business to lose. Well there is that kind (the troublemaker) and our kind. We know this person is not a happy person. She didnt write to me personally - she created a storm. Stormy people. Stormy unhappy people. Shish! My intention was not to create a storm but to prevent trouble to both the poste
6. inquiry TYLER [1]
Did your James J. Torrey have a son James who married Elizabeth Rawlings? Joan On Aug 26, 2005, at 10:49 PM, Doug and Dee wrote: Hi Janice, I forgot to ask you one other question. I'm also descended from a Lieutenant James J. TORREY, who was blown up by gun powder in a house in Scituate, Mass. in 1665. He was married to Anne HATCH. Who is the author "TORREY" you're referring to, and what did he write, since I'd like to see his works? Cheers, Dee *******************************************************
7. RE: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Ipswich Hamlet Record [1]
>Accordingly to The Hammatt papers, on page 149, the author states that >daughter of Christopher Hodgkins, Grace died at the Hamlet, 1737. What >documentation would we have for this citation? Ipswich vital records >shows no death for this under her maiden name. Is the author presuming or >am I missing something? In trying to check this using WorldConnect, Grace married twice. The first time was to Richard Tarr, in Gloucester, and he d. 1724 in Fox Harbor, ME. She then m. Joshua Cromwell on 10 NOV 1726.
8. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] inquiry [1]
Subject: Tyler Source: History of Lynn, Mass. by Alonzo Lewis & James R. Newhall Boston, 1865. p.190 1640. among others of Lynn in 1640 was Nathaniel Tyler. p.192 Nathaniel Tyler does not seem to have remained in Lynn many years after 1640. By a record (p.20) of the first book of the Essex Registry, it appears that he and his wife, Jane sold "unto Philip Kirtland, shoemaker," all their "lands and houses with their appurtenances in Lynn," by deed dated Oct 1, 1652. On the 16th of that same month he mad
9. Re: WILLIAMS , Joseph of Boston [1]
I hope you dont mind, I am including the Ma-Bay-Colony-L@rootsweb.com mailing list as someone may be able to help you further. (list: you can see Doug's message below mine) --- Here are some Joseph's born in or near Boston......good leads (homework for you) - "Pioneers of Massachusetts" ; Clarence Torrey, has the following: --George William, of Salem, freeman in 1634; children were: Jon. 1636; Samuel 1638; Joseph1640; Bethiah 1642; Geoge 1644 (all baptisms not births) --John of Newbury; had son Jose
10. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Winthrop Book [1]
I am the owner/host of the webpage Janice has online and will not remove "The Winthrop Fleet," by Charles Banks. This book was published in 1930 and according to what I read in the copyright laws at the Library of Congress site at http://www.copyright.gov/: If a copyright originally secured before January 1, 1964, was not renewed at the proper time, copyright protection expired at the end of the 28th calendar year of the copyright and could not be restored. I have also done some other research and not on
11. Peter Dill birth date??? [1]
Would anyone have the birth date for Peter Dill, [I don't have his parents] who died 13 August 1692 in Chelmsford, MA? He married Thanks Shepherd, who was born 10 February 1650, in Malden, MA. I would like her death date if anyone has it. Thanks, Paula
12. PEck Bible corrections [1]
> Thanks Eliz. I presume you're saying the word I wrote as cadeh should be cadet. If anyone else sees something that needs correcting, please let me know. Sometimes I have absolutely no idea what the word is supposed to be and can only guess at what the writing says. Carol > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] PEck Bible Part III > From: > ElizHgene@aol.com > Date: > Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:18:17 EDT > To: > MA-BAY-COLONY-L@roots
13. Re: have you seen the town's fees lately ???? [1]
I agree! I wanted a death certificate from Fall River. The certificate was expensive however they added extra $4.00 fee's to it and they demanded a SASE. They also wanted a search fee upfront before they would search. I never ordered it. I called it quits then and waited until I went to the Vital Records HQ. Speaking of which they recently transferred more records to the MA Archives. So in a few months they should be available for research. I'm excited. That's where I'll find the certificate I
14. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Re: Grateful thanks [1]
Well then I am a blessing in disguise. More or less.
15. Re: [MEYORK] Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] have you seen the town's fees lately ???? [1]
Have you seen the fees lately ? Many cannot afford it.... and that is why I suggested the Massachusetts Archives since the Mass. Archives info and the town clerk info is basically the same... has to be if they are copies of the originals. And for $3.00 VS $18 plus,(the $18 only covers 10 year search, what if one needs a 100 year search ???) I'd go with the Mass.Archives, price is $3 regardless how many years back and get the same information. Cynthia SEARCH FOR BIRTH, DEATH, OR MARRIAGE RECORDS
16. RE: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Winthrop Book [1]
Christie, Actually, copyright is now 95 years. Congress bowed to pressure from the Disney company because the copyright was about to run out on Steamboat Willie, AKA Mickey Mouse. I found this out recently when trying to find out why Higginson Books didn't have a book in whcih someone was itnerested. I don't think that reprints qualify for the protection if it is just a reprint of the original. If it were, Higginson would be all over a great many of us for transcribing such books as "The History o
17. Re: MA-BAY-COLONY-D Digest V05 #231 [1]
Listers -- Aren't we the luckiest -- to have two such active, informed participants on this list! My hat's off to Janice and Cynthia!!! Many Thanks Ladies -- Terri
18. Re: WORMSTALL, Cape Porpus [1]
"Directory of the Heads of New England Familes, 1620-1700; Frank R.Holmes, NY, 1923 According to this book, they are 2 different families. - WORMALL, WORMELL, WORMWELL -Joseph, inhabitant at Rowley,Mass. 1640; Removed to Boston,1649, thence to Scituate, died in 1662. WORMSTALL - Arthur, swore allegiance Wells, Maine, 1653 WORMLEY -Ralph, Dover, NH 1684 WORMWOOD -Henry, at Lynn,Mass. 1666 -William, resident of Kittery maine 1640; living on Isle of Shoals, NH 1647 ------------- Cynthia ----- Original Messag
19. lets get the record straight on the vital records in Massachusetts [1]
With all the fuss (rightly so) about the vital records at town clerks offices and the Massachusetts archives, here is the website that explains everything. http://www.mass.gov/dph/bhsre/rvr/vrcopies.htm and the info below came from there (it shows the fees as well, just as I posted them) >>Vital Records have been registered in Massachusetts since 1635. Statewide collection began in 1841. Records for events that occurred from 1841-1910 are available at the State Archives (617) 727-2816. Earlier records may
20. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Re: MA-BAY-COLONY-D Digest V05 #231 [1]
Terri et al; I will second that statement! Thanks to all the great information passed on to this list! Dan Harriman Orange, Texas At 08:34 AM 8/26/2005, you wrote: >Listers -- > >Aren't we the luckiest -- to have two such active, informed participants >on this list! >My hat's off to Janice and Cynthia!!! > >Many Thanks Ladies -- Terri
21. copyright question, please [1]
I was chastized on another list for transcribing info - allegedly still under copyright restrictions. I stopped. Now, I've been told one can transcribe such info IF it's not done EXACTLY - word for word. Is this correct? Everyone please try to remember we're not seeing faces while we read these emails -- it's hard to tell what a person's real intention is. We gotta play nice kids, or they'll take our playground privileges away -- :)))))) Keep well all -- Terri
22. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Ancestor's signatures on documents [1]
The US Census distinguished the ability to read and the ability to write, so whatever we think nowadays, it is clear those before us saw separate functioning. Most of the 'X marks' in lieu of signatures undoubtedly were due to inability to write at all, and not from physical affliction.
23. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Re: Grateful thanks [1]
I'm flattered :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 4:06 PM Subject: Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Re: Grateful thanks > In a message dated 8/26/2005 3:37:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, > Farns10th@aol.com writes: > I dont know about you, Cynthia but I dont recall being >> called >> a blessing. A few other things but not that. (grin) > > > > LOL I am sure Cynthia has been called a blessing before >
24. The Ship, The Lion 1631 arrived at Nantasket NOT Nantucket.. [1]
Thanks to JackBowk@aol.com - I once again typed Nantucket for Nantasket and the reason is I spent time on Nantucket when growing up at my Great Uncle's home at Oak Bluffs, Martha's Vineyard (and the names are almost alike) what I see on the page - gets converted in my brain to what I know and there is no excuse for that. > > p.41 > > November 3l, 1631 > > The ship Lion, William Peirce master, arrived at Nan- > tucket. WRONG - TWAS NANTASKET There came in her, the governor's wife, Margar- >
25. Re: [Ma-Bay-Colony] Winthrop Book---- [1]
Lists: I agree with John here. I have several Charles Banks books and those that were just reprints, have no copyrite. As you know, most old books do not have an index and when the old books are reprinted with an index added, the index is copyrited, not the whole book. --i.e. THE HAMMAT PAPERS; Early Inhibitants of Ipswich,Massachusetts, 1633-1700; Abraham Hammat, Ipswich, Mass., 1880-1889 Originally reprinted, seven parts in one Ipswich, Mass. 1880-1889 Reprinted, seven parts in one. - With an added
Viewing 1-25 of 119 matches from 36,117,749 documents1 2 3 4 5 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.609907