Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:aug +date:2003)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,351 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. RE: [TMG] GenBridge in use by another program [1]
They probably figure not too many people will be switching from TMG, so didn't bother to implement it. On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 20:10, Richard Damon wrote: > I just tried down loading Ancestry Family Tree. The strange thing is that it > does use Genbridge (the about box acknowledges this) BUT IT DOES NOT IMPORT > TMG FILES!!! It will read AFT 9.0, AQ 3.0, FTW 3-9, PAF 2.x, GEDCOM, but not > TMG. I wonder if TMG gives them too much data they don't know how to handle? > > Richard Damon
2. Re: [TMG] Scanning Birth, Death Certificates,etc [1]
Why would you make 2 scans, when it is a simpler matter to resize the 150 ppi scan to 75ppi in software and much quicker than making 2 scans? On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 08:42, dkeiffer wrote: > First of all we need to realize that printers print in DPI and scanners scan > in resolutions known as PPI and monitors diplay in resolutions of 640 x 480 > or 1024 x 768 or ... etc at 75 PPI. > With this said I cannot explain how we put all of this together and I have > read all about it and still do not fully understa
3. Re: [TMG] Re: TMG-D Digest V03 #1354 [1]
I think the Ike came from Eisenhower, not Dwight. On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 07:40, Strickkao@aol.com wrote: > "Ike" was the nickname for Dwight (Eisenhower). Don't know if it is used > with the name Dwight with any consistency. > > Kathy Strickland > Lisle, IL > > > ==== TMG Mailing List ==== > TMG v5.0 has been released. Check the Wholly Genes web Store for more information.
4. RE: [TMG] Report - Journal, Narrative, Detail - [0.969707]
Terry, I am unsure how to implement your suggestion. Where do I find the "No children"/"No known children" option? That sounds like a perfect solution if TMG treats this (is it a tag?) as "having children" in reports and places the person in the "correct" generation. The "placeholder" solution creates too many problems, for instance, an additional phantom person in box charts -- that "Unknown Person" that pops up between the individual and the "placeholder" child. Ron -----Original Message----- From: Te
5. Re: [TMG] WISHLST [0.969707]
AGH3RD@aol.com wrote: >What I'm wondering is this... > >After 5.0 is finished there is going to be, according to Bob (I think), a >wishlist "review" pf some sort or other. My answers below are based on past observations and gleaned from statements made by the staff of Wholly Genes including Bob Velke on this and other public forums. >Will the entire "wishlist" be posted and discussed? No. >Who will compose it- and how? It is continuously composed by the staff of Wholly Genes solely for in-house use.
6. RE: [TMG] 5.08 Unused "New Place" in my MPL, Optimize won't remove [0.969707]
It may be used by a repositiory. Richard Damon -- rbrdamon@rcn,.com (Home) rdamon@beltronicsinc.com (Work) richard@damon.name (Genealogy) -----Original Message----- From: LK@kuhnslagoon.net [mailto:LK@kuhnslagoon.net] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:20 AM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] 5.08 Unused "New Place" in my MPL, Optimize won't remove I just came across a place record in my file called "New Place" (City) which is the default place left over from UFT. Checking Events shows the record is
7. [TMG] Project vs dataset [0.969707]
Thank you, Terry, for the excellent articles on datasets and projects. I am wondering what users would think is the better setup in my situation. My main database in about 2500 people, mostly ancestors and siblings with a few collateral lines continued for a few generations. I also have three other databases, about the same size, each of which is primarily the descendants of one person. My primary interest is ancestors and when I print that database I don't want all the descendants of the individual
8. Re: [TMG] Why can't TMG 5.x import from itself? [0.969707]
Merryann Palmer wrote: >Sounds like a silly question, but - I have a home LAN and would like to have >the ability to import a project directly from my main computer to my laptop >without having to go through either making a Gedcom or a backup first. >However, importing from TMG 5x is not an option for import. I have managed >to do it by copying the entire file directory over the network, but it seems >there should be an easier way. Do a backup on your main computer and the do a Restore of that backup on y
9. Re: [TMG] TMG Filing System [0.969707]
I use a system of surname ring binders, divided into three sections. At the front of the binder are charts, family group sheets etc for that family line. Next come all the "evidence" documents produced by my research, filed in chronologicalorder. These could be BMD certificates, photocopies of census entries, transcripts I have made from parish registers etc. The final section is devoted to correspondence with other researchers, repositories etc and is also filed in date order. Caroline Gurney Portsmout
10. Re: [TMG] 5.09 Format for entering Tentative Place Names (How-to?) [0.969707]
Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 11:59:49 PM, LK@kuhnslagoon.net wrote: Lkn> *Disclaimer: The following relates to report output, not display output. Lkn> **Keywords: Question, Complaint, Wish List, Arrrrrgh Lkn> ===================================================== Lkn> I've been stressing and stretching to find a way to get this type of Lkn> sentence out of TMG: Lkn> John Doe was b. 1673 , CT -or- Lkn> John Doe was b. 1673 [New Haven County], CT Lkn> For the sake of ar
11. Re: [TMG] TMG 5.08 Descendant Indented Chart to Notepad, Characters? [0.969707]
bob gillis wrote: >My question is why would you want to send a report to Notepad especially >if you have WORD. One reason is that MS/Word adds formatting characters to a file unless one is careful. Notepad does not and thus one can open a file and make minor changes and save the results without fear of adding any formatting characters. Yes, it is a fairly simple thing to ensure that any text-only file is saved in MS/Word without the formatting characters (e.g., as a text-only file), but it is a lot
12. [TMG] "Conversion error #13, source file discrepency" what does this mean??? [0.969707]
When printing a Journal Narrative (descendant) report in TMG 5.09 output to MS WORD, I am receiving an error message titled "Conversion error #13, source file discrepancy". I looked at my sources and nothing seems obviously wrong. Does anyone have any suggestions?
13. Re: [TMG] TMG 5.09 - WordPerfect 10 Apparently Not Supported - Suggested Enha... [0.969707]
I have WP8, 10, and 11 on my computer - and they all work fine with tmg reports. There must be something else going on with your WP. In tmg Preferences/Advanced, what is your default directory for Reports? Virginia RonB wrote: > > Unless there is a better way around this problem, hopefully direct support > for more recent versions of WordPerfect will be incorporated into a future > (near-term) release! >
14. Re: [TMG] Journal report to WP [0.969707]
On or about 09:41 08/12/03 a carrier pigeon from Richard Cleaveland delivered: >Otherwise, THANK YOU for using the native language of the word processors >rather than forcing them all to use the uncomfortable RTF compromise. Though I've encountered an annoyance, in my mind... I'd tried a Journal (reverse register) to Word this morning. It allowed me to select fonts, and I'd set it for Lucida Bright... Only to have it then object that it can only use about four fonts (NONE of which I
15. RE: [TMG] OT - Batch Processing Images [0.969707]
Hi Cheri I use Irfanview Nikki -----Original Message----- From: Cheri Casper [SMTP:clcasper@sprynet.com] Sent: Friday, 29 August 2003 5:28 p.m. To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] OT - Batch Processing Images Isn't there some program that gets mentioned every once in awhile that will do some batch processing of images, like changing the extensions? I have found that the reason some of my images don't display as thumbnails in WE is that Paint Shop puts some sort of header that says "Paint Shop Pro ima
16. Re: [TMG] Person with NO information [0.969707]
If it is appropriate, I enter unknown folks with a name Unknown Unknown. At least when I see this in a report it tells me that there was such a person, but that his or her's name is unknown to me. If I know nothing about any relationship and know only that a child was born I might simply not mention any partner. The child simply shows up as the son of the person. However, I usually do add the Unknown person to let me and any readers know the extent of my information.-Dale
17. Re: [TMG] Preserving ID# [0.969707]
On 8/4/03, at 15:49, Allen Mellen wrote: >Technically, data sets are not actually merged, rather the second data >set is appended to the end of the first data set. The second data set is >also preserved intact. >The numbers in the first data set are preserved in this process. >If you make a placeholder person in the first data set (before the merge) >and renumber that person to have the ID 100000, then after the merge, >person 1 in the second data set will be 100001, person number 2 will be >100002
18. [TMG] Who turned the lights out? [0.969707]
Caw! It wasn't half quiet without you lot! Hope that you can all see to get working again! Judith In a very bright, sunny, well-lit UK
19. Re: [TMG] Exhibits question - images [0.969707]
Marilyn, > while I have not done the homework > necessary for a blanket statement, I suspect that the various manuals of > style would not sanction the present treatment. Looking at two current references... Henry Hoff's Genealogical Writing in the 21st Century (the style manual for the NEHGS Register) and The BCG Genealogical Standards Manual... in essence, the topic of image style and placement does not appear to be treated at all. I suspect that such decisions are addressed between authors and editors
20. Re: [TMG] Sources [0.969707]
At 09:25 AM 8/20/2003 -0700, Pauline Ballentine wrote: > I hit the report button, then IN button, the Report Definition Screen >appears (the bypass RDS in unchecked) then I hit the print & save button. >Report shows up fine. Where are you printing the report? To Screen, Printer, to File? If to File, what type? Paul E. Lawrence lawrpaul@citlink.net My Lawrence Genealogy web page is located at the following URL: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~lawrpaul/index.htm Includes allied surnames of
21. RE: [TMG] Role Assignments [0.969707]
Richard and Jeff, you guys got me there. I totally forgot about that. Thanks for reminding me. Standing Corrected, Linda > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Damon [mailto:richard@damon.name] > Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 6:19 PM > To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: RE: [TMG] Role Assignments > > > Small correction: In TMG tags in the History group can (and > must) have no > principals. > > Richard Damon > -- > rbrdamon@rcn,.com (Home) > rdamon@beltronicsinc.com (Work) > richard@dam
22. Re: [TMG] Newbie Source Abbreviation Question [0.969707]
In a message dated 8/12/2003 3:02:24 PM Central Standard Time, TMG-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: > This is the sort of thing I'd like to get right from the beginning. I'm > adding my first source, which happens to be my own birth certificate. > According to Bob Velke's tapes, the abbreviation should be something along the > lines of "Keener, Robert birth certificate" or some variation of this. > It seems to me that identifying each individual source this way would > quickly lead to a Master Sou
23. Re: [TMG] TMG5.09 - Box chart report definition enhancement - One person focus [0.969707]
At 01:08 PM 8/14/2003 -0400, Lee Hoffman wrote: >Au contraire, it is possible. When the Report Definition Screen is >displayed, click on the Add button under Configuration Name and give the >new configuration a name that will indicate to you that it is for a >certain person. Save that and then under Subject(s) of the report, choose >the One person option de-selecting the Use current person option. After >you Save (or Print and Save) the Report Definition (including any other >changes), the next tim
24. [TMG] Question regarding semicolon in event exhibit sentence [0.969707]
Still a problem, and I cannot find a resolution. In an event tag to which an exhibit image is attached, in the Descendant Narrative report to Word 97, the ouput is something like this: Joe Principal and family experienced the great electrical failure in New York City on 14 August 2003; Image is here ... Memo is here ... So, does anyone know how to avoid the semicolon? Marilyn
25. [TMG] OT-Genealogy DOT Com is now back in Operation [0.969707]
But the searches are still dog slow for the most part.
Viewing 1-25 of 2,351 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.489926