Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:feb +date:2002)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,730 matches from 36,014,699 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [TMG] Adding Meat to the Bones [1]
If one is writing a story or book, these sentences begin to add some meat to the bones. If as sentence reads: At age 28, Mary became a widow. . . then I think the thought (subconsciously) breezes through one's mind: Poor woman, she probably had
2. [TMG] Index Codes [1]
Since they say a book is only as good as its index, I followed this thread on indexing with some interest. It wasn't mentioned what happens to people not in the database. Some have said to avoid having children in a database, they enter the children's names in a memo for a particular census. If children's names, or anyone's name, is entered in the <[M]> part of a sentence construction, will they be indexed -- if they are not in the database? Or is it necessary to put Index codes in. I am try
3. [TMG] Digest in Hotmail [1]
Just wanted to let folks know that the Digest mode in Hotmail is really quite a simple affair. You get one "page" with a list at the top of the subjects and persons sending the question. Then you just scan down the page to read all the messages. They are all listed one after the other. No clicking on each individual query. One can quickly scan through all the messages. The drawback is. . .you can't possibly save any messages because your account size is limited (the free one anyway). But I j
4. [TMG] String Cites [1]
I'll have to chime in and say to Cheri and Terry that I LOVED their idea of string cites. I, too, had nothing to contribute and so didn't comment. I'm clueless as to how to set it up - just know I would like to have it. Actually, with their detailed examples, I have now just typed my own in the Citation Detail - although it is a bit of work. Go for it! Barbara _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://w
5. Re: [TMG] Witness GEDCOM [0.971148]
Hi. For those interested this is my new way of organizing the GEDCOM into a NOTE instead of EVEN. Comments? The information in this NOTE was extracted from the submitter's database. The original database (The Master Genealogist) does not allow this information to be transmitted by GEDCOM because of the possibility of confusion or error. If the following is unclear in anyway, please contact the submitter for clarification. The information was originally in an Event form. It contained one or two Principle
6. [TMG] Source Template for a Passport Application [0.971148]
Does anyone have a source template for a US Passport Application?
7. Re: [TMG] Re: Genealogy vs. Family History [0.971148]
Pat Farrell wrote: > Gee, I expected to learn things from this list, but I sure > didn't expect to learn that I was not interested in genealogy. > I knew that some folks care about the genetic tree, who-begat-who, etc. > more than I do. I'm at least as interested in finding cousins that > were horse thiefs or politicians as chasing up bloodlines. But > I thought that what I cared about was under the global category > of genealogy. and Andy replied: > As I said, family history and genealogy are different
8. RE: [TMG] (W/w)itness - terminology (was: Long discourse...) [0.971148]
Actually I tried and the built in roles Principal and Witness are special. the principals at the top of the box can not select the Role Witness, and a person in the other Witnesses box can not select the role Principal, so Witnesses can not be Principals, and principals can not be WITNESSES. -- Redirector to current best: Richard_Damon@iname.com Home: rbrdamon@rcn.com Work: rdamon@BeltronicsInc.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Caroline Gurney [mailto:caroline.gurney@ntlworld.com] > Sent: Friday,
9. Re: [TMG] RUG TAPES [0.971148]
John, The Roots User Group of Arlington, Virginia (RUG) see www.rootsusers.org Robin Lamacraft (Adelaide, Australia)
10. Re: [TMG] Association of UK and USA Place Label Contents [0.971148]
In a message dated 2/27/02 1:25:45 AM Central Standard Time, ladybonita@attbi.com writes: > I can not respond to the because I have not modified my Place Labels .. but > I am wondering the correct association between UK and USA places. Maybe you > can help me. > > Detail: Church, Cemetery, etc. > City: City > County: for UK I have nothing in this. > State: Shire > County: England, Ireland, Wales, etc .. > > for Germany I use: > > City: = City > County = Kreis > State = Land of .
11. RE: [TMG] Adding Misc. notes to TMG [0.971148]
Glee Crocker wrote: >Mine is on the right side. If you move your cursor over it, it is called >Research Log. So sorry, I forgot there were TWO file-looking folders! Actually the Research Log icon is supposedly designed to look like a stenographer's notepad. The other looks more like the file folder in which you would find Stenographer's pads stored. ---------- Lee Hoffman/KY E-mail: lhoffman@acm.org TMG Tips: My website: --------------
12. [TMG] FTST Import problem [0.971148]
I downloaded and installed FTST last night. (At the same time I ordered TMG Gold from Wholly Genes.) FTST seems to work all right on the sample dataset, but I have been unable to import my data into it. _____ I have an FTM (I understand it is version 6) backup file I got from my brother and have tried twice to import. He burned the file onto a CD-R for me while he was here visiting. He has never had a problem with any of his data files. The file is: THOMAS.FBK 199,806 KB FTST works a long time on
13. Re: [TMG] Custom Census Tags; Was Custom Tags - newbie questions [0.971148]
In a message dated 2/26/02 7:07:27 PM Central Standard Time, clcasper@sprynet.com writes: > . I think that the user can make TMG as complicated or as simple as > they wish. From my viewpoint, the basic program is difficult enough without > my deliberating making choices that make it more so. > > CheriC > That's true. I guess I am used to custom tags and the ability to write sentences for each role from UFT, so I don't get confused with it in TMG, but if I were a newby, then I would be glad
14. Re: [TMG] Widowed Tag Sentence Structure [0.971148]
----- Ref: Glee Crocker, 9 Feb 2002 9:36, "[TMG] Widowed Tag Sentence Structur": ----- > For some reason, Im not able to add a default sentence to the widow > tag, although I have added as well as well as modified others > What should I check? Is the problem that TMG will not accept it in the tag definition screen or that it does not appear in the report? If it does not appear in the report, it might be that there is written something in the sentence for the specific tag you try to print out (o
15. Re: [TMG] Witness GEDCOM [0.971148]
----- Ref: Lee Hoffman, 13 Feb 2002 22:17, "Re: [TMG] Witness GEDCOM": ----- > I took a quick look at your web site showing the "GEDCOM > after" just now. My only comment is that the standard > structure for an EVEN tag in GEDCOM according to the GEDCOM > "standard" would be something like: > 1 EVEN > 2 TYPE > 2 DATE > 2 PLAC > 2 SOUR > 3 PAGE >
16. Re: [TMG] US 1930 Census [0.971148]
In a message dated 2/14/02 2:29:36 PM Central Standard Time, gleemc@earthlink.net writes: > Thanks much: > I have added to your great list....................... where living tag > is NOT equal to NO..... Is there any reason to not exclude children? I.e., > limit the search to birth group after ca. 1918? I don't limit it at all. I look for everyone born between 1831 and 1931 who are still alive in 1931. I try to find EVERYONE in my database on every census. It's time consuming, but I find h
17. Re: [TMG] PDAs [0.971148]
Joe You are saying then that it is legal to read FTM files, but to write them would be a violation of copyright laws? Walt At 05:31 AM 2/15/02 -0500, Joe Makowiec wrote: >At 03:13 AM 2-15-2002 -0500, Walt Flory wrote: >>Let me throw out the original question and ask a new one: >> GenBridge imports in many formats, does it export in anything other >> than GEDCOM? > >This is just off the top of my head; check the list archives at >http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Software/TMG.html if you want
18. Re: [TMG] Quantity of Sources / Insufficient Memory [0.971148]
At 18/02/2002 18:52 -0600, Marcia Philbrick wrote: > From those messages, it appears that Windows Me or Windows XP is a > commonality. However, one message indicated the problem might be tied to > a large number of sources. Marcia, I'm running TMG 4.0d on WindowsMe with 64 MB RAM (and that's the bare minimum). My database does have at this moment +8000 people, +2500 sources, +14000 citations, etc ... and I don't have error problems as you have. But I don't use internal exhibits. Greetings, Luc Ma
19. RE: [TMG] US 1930 Census [0.971148]
In a message dated 2/13/02 9:47:22 AM Central Standard Time, gleemc@earthlink.net writes: > Since the 1930 U.S. census will be released soon, has anyone thought of a > report > to identify those individuals for whom a 1930 census record is needed, and > to sort > by location in 1920? Can this entire process be automated? > > > Glee, This is what I am going to do and you might be able to tweak it. Run a list of people who were: Any Birth Group Tag Before 1931 AND Any Birth Group Tag After 1831 AND Any
20. Re: [TMG] Re: Finding multiple tags [0.971148]
nick wrote: > > Help please. I should be grateful for advice on how to search for tags > which are repeated for one person, eg: multiple birth tags, so that I > can construct alternative sentence structures for the non-primary ones > > Cheers > Nick Hi Nick, Hopefully someone will have a better method. The best I can think of is a List of Events Report with: Prin1 *Marker is... | Off | |AND Tag Type Group is...| Birth | |END Richard Brogger
21. [TMG] Picture format question [0.971148]
Hello! Any tips on what format/size to to scan genealogy pictures as? Also, I have been scaning them to separate folders to organize them but wondered if there was a better way to organize. My method is something like this. a folder with my mothers last name and a folder with my fathers last name. In my mothers folder are subfolders with her siblings names then also subfolders with her mothers last name and fathers last name. I think you get the idea. The only problem is there are some surnames that are co
22. Re: [TMG] Strange behavior of a note in TMG 4.0d [0.971148]
Ron - Was this data imported from FTM? I had Pri attached to a lot of tags that were associated with data imported from FTM. CheriC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald Ray Carlton" To: Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 1:35 PM Subject: [TMG] Strange behavior of a note in TMG 4.0d I have a short note that appears as Pri in the person view (Note * Pri). The memo appears as (quotes are mine): "[:CR:]Taught in high schools of Michigan for 37 years, the l
23. Re: [TMG] Re: Genealogy vs. Family History- MORE [0.971148]
In a message dated 2/8/02 10:00:02 PM Central Standard Time, pfarrell@pfarrell.com writes: > Gee, I expected to learn things from this list, but I sure > didn't expect to learn that I was not interested in genealogy. > I knew that some folks care about the genetic tree, who-begat-who, etc. > more than I do. I'm at least as interested in finding cousins that > were horse thiefs or politicians as chasing up bloodlines. But > I thought that what I cared about was under the global category > of genealogy. >
24. Re: [TMG] Just ordered [0.971148]
In a message dated 2/21/2002 9:18:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, jhurt2@kc.rr.com writes: > I just ordered TMG 4.0. However, TMG just e-mailed me back and said a patch > has to be downloaded. Is that correct? Why a fix? > I just got my TMG yesterday, and was not told of a patch, so this really interests me as well. Blake M. Stough List Admin. (STAUCH, LENHART, AMREV-CAMP-SECURITY, BEHLER) Researching Stough-Stauch-Stouch families originating in York County, Penna. Visit the Stough-Stauch-Stouch Genealo
25. Re: [TMG] Wish List- Add Person Screen and Citations [0.971148]
Lee Hoffman wrote: > If you find yourself constantly changed the Tag Sentence for the Birth and > Death tags when you enter new persons, then you really want to do a global > modification to the Birth and Death Tag Sentences. Thanks Lee, but I am not explaining myself very well. The problem is that I try not to use the same sentence style each time I make a birth entry (or death, etc.). So unless I am missing something, changing the template will give me a different sentence, but again I will get it a
Viewing 1-25 of 2,730 matches from 36,014,699 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.739887