Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:feb +date:2003)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,433 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: [TMG] Re: Source Element Groups [limit to # ?] [1]
Beth wrote: > Caroline, > > Did you delete all source types that use the LISTSERVE element? For > example, LISTSERVE is used in the Electronic File (Listserver) source > type. If you haven't deleted that source type, plus any others where > LISTSERVE appears, then LISTSERVE _is_ in use. Having said that, I don't > actually know whether deleting all source types that use a given source > element will then enable you to delete that source element...maybe TMG > will still tell you it is "in use" . Hi Beth
2. Re: [TMG] Re: Source Element Groups [limit to # ?] [1]
Caroline Gurney wrote: >Terry Reigel wrote: > > > But there really is no "grouping"!!!! > > > >Terry, > >Whilst agreeing that Aliases would be a better description I think you are >probably on to a loser in trying to do away with the "Group" terminology. > >For one thing, the program itself makes extensive use of the word. > >For another, the "grouping" does actually exist in this sense - that the >program comes with 101 source elements (as counted in the TMG 4 Manual) >which Wholly Genes h
3. Re: [TMG] Re: Source Element Groups [limit to # ?] [1]
Caroline Gurney wrote: >I didn't delete any of the TMG default source types such as Electronic File >(Listserver). My dataset was imported into 5.04 from 4.0d containing only my >own custom source types. None of them use the LISTSERVE source element - or >the SHIP NAME or the APPLIED TO elements, for that matter. But the program >nonetheless tells me that they are in use - presumably because they are >needed in case I ever want to switch back to the default source types, which >I don't. The question is whe
4. RE: [TMG] TMG locking computer [1]
Hi Harvey, >> The use of a third party database with an external shell leads to abnormal usage of memory ALL 'real' databases are used with external shells. Db2, Oracle, Sybase etc. There's nothing abnormal about it. When windows first started, many DOS users considered (and probably still do) the amount of memory required by windows programs to be abnormal. >>With the new 32-bit interface that has been incorporated with 5.x, the >>symptom becomes the grayed options rather than the locked up machine
5. Re: [TMG] Opinions on Unique Endnotes? 5.04D & 4.0 [1]
Dear Teresa, You said: "I, basically use head of household in the full citation for the same reason I do most of my research in Rutherford County, TN. My dang family can't get out. So on a basic census page with 20 families listed, I will cite at least 12 of them. It is just one more step" Teresa, Middle Tennessee must be a lot like East Tennessee Although I have never confessed but perhaps someone has guessed (due to my questions about tags for TVA removals etc.) my maternal grandparents
6. Re: [TMG] 5.04 Short Descr. and Comment Fields in Master Place List [1]
Please, I got no answers to my question about the Comment and Detail portions of the Master Place List. Does anyone know the answer? Have included full thread, in case no one remembers what it was about. Am currently trying to clean up about 3,000 (literally) postings from TMG-L, because my computer was off-line for about a month (talk about the DTs!!). Thanks in advance for any help someone can give on this Place question. Doreen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doreen & Peter Neilley"
7. Re: [TMG] TMG 5 -- Sources on PAF import UPDATE [1]
Steve, > Importing the GEDCOM does not pick up the citations. If PAF5 doesn't have the citations, how is anything else going to have the citations? I'll look at a GEDCOM out of PAF5. Jim
8. Re: [TMG] Import problems [1]
Gary, The NOTE is a long note using 'tagged notes' which is a PAF convention to structure notes. I would think that this would import. Note the following: 2 CONT Birth certificate lists name of mother as Esther Casey Burke... this is 2 CONC an error In other words, three lines beginning as: 2 CONT is 2 CONC In the GEDCOM, is the 'is' on its own line or was this an email artifact? Once I cleaned these up and addded a 0 TRLR, your fragment imported with the entire note into one TMG Note tag. I thought th
9. Re: [TMG] newby question [1]
In a message dated 2/10/2003 12:14:44 PM Central Standard Time, dennilyn@attbi.com writes: > Dennilyn > > For a birth tag, you should only have one person attached, the person whose birth it is. That person should be attached to the PRINCIPAL role, or if you have it the BIRTH role. If they are also attached to the WITNESS role, you need to reimport. Teresa Ghee Elliott Need help with TMG sentences? Click here
10. Re: [TMG] v5.04 Difference in Number of People [1]
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 9:00:31 PM, you wrote: S> I am confused.. S> When I look at project summary it says people= 1838. S> However, when I run an Ahnentafel report of all people S> it says people = 25,372. ????????????? I think that's an Ahnentafel number, not a count of people in the report. In an Ahnentafel, each person is given a number. The subject's number is 1. To find a person's father, double that person's number. To find a person's mother, double that person's number and add one. So,
11. [TMG] v5.04 Printing Dates in Sentences [1]
I would wish to be able to have the following in a sentence: John Smith was born in 1775. or John Smith was born in March 1775 or John Smith was born on 24 March 1775 currently I get John Smith was born on 1775 etc. which doesn't look quite right. Is there an option to select the word 'in' when an incomplete date is all that is known? Kind Regards... Martin Jackson in a sunny Perthshire, Bonnie Scotland. Researching BULL; HOLLOWAY; JACKSON & TIPPER in Derbyshire. --- Outgoing mail is certified
12. 4.0 Re: [TMG] Newbie [1]
In a message dated 2/12/2003 9:23:23 AM Central Standard Time, ccampbell4@carolina.rr.com writes: > Last question: Does the "Lee" guy (can't remember his last name - TMG guru) > still visit this List? Does he still have his "TMG Tips" Web site? > > Glad to be back. > > Chuck Campbell > Welcome back. I put 4.0 in your subject line so the TMG 4.0 gurus will see you. Yup Lee Hoffman is still here as is www.tmgtips.com. Be sure and put 4.0 in your subject line, as there are users of both prod
13. RE: [TMG] Status of v5.05 [1]
I appreciate the update. Hope you get some sleep tonight...... Jackie > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Velke [mailto:bvelke@whollygenes.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:35 PM > To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [TMG] Status of v5.05 > > > > >Hurry Bob, you may save me. > > It's 10:30 and developers, beta testers, and I are still here > banging away > on it... > > But we're having trouble with the patching engine and it doesn't > look like > v5.05 will happen tonight. We'll
14. RE: [TMG] TMG 5 Individual Report [1]
Ralf - You can't currently output to MS Word format. You would have to use RTF format and then open that in MSWord. CheriC -----Original Message----- From: Ralf Kienzle [mailto:kienzle@ralfkienzle.de] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:49 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] TMG 5 Individual Report Hello list, in the last few months I was busy entering my data and with SecondSite I got good results in making cd`s and sharing my data with many family members. Now, there is one person without a compu
15. RE: [TMG] [5.04] Witnesses, roles and what else will I lose? [1]
Gary, I'm interested..... I would love to see a Wit2note for v5. Jackie > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Hester [mailto:genehest@bellsouth.net] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:38 PM > To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [TMG] [5.04] Witnesses, roles and what else will I lose? > > > Hi Fran > > If you really think that you do not want to use witnesses then > probable the > easiest way to speed conversion would be to use WIT2NOTE in your TMG v4 > dataset and then convert that to TMG v5. >
16. Re: [TMG] Memorial Service Tag [1]
Must be a custom tag for you...put a + after the P, i.e. [P+] to force the full name rather than tmg pronoun substitution..... At 11:54 AM 2/22/2003 -0600, Jack E. Hokenstrom wrote: >The Mem Servic tag has a sentence structure of "a memorial service was >held for [P] <[M]> <[D]> <[L]>" which results in the following sentence: >A memorial service was held for he. > >Suggestions any one? Paul E. Lawrence lawrpaul@citlink.net My Lawrence Genealogy web page has moved to the following URL: http://freepage
17. RE: [TMG] 4.0d problem with code for italics in sentence structure [1]
Who knows. Just one of those idiosyncracies. CheriC -----Original Message----- From: Diana Powell [mailto:dianapowell@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 10:41 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [TMG] 4.0d problem with code for italics in sentence structure Cheri Casper wrote: > > Diana - I suspect that although some codes seem to work if placed in the > sentence structure (at least they do for me), it is my understanding that > that is not the expected behavior. I imagine that you wi
18. [TMG] 5.04 Bookmarks is there a limit? [1]
Last night I created a book mark for each of my third great grand parents. I am one of the book marks. This morning, I opened the bookmark manager, and I am not there any more. Is there a limit on the number of bookmarks a person can have? Teresa Ghee Elliott Need help with TMG sentences? Click here or go to http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery/
19. Re: [TMG] Question on Font Sizes [1]
Changing the font size in File>Preferences>Lists has no effect on the font size in the data entry fields of the Source Definition screen of the Master Source list. These are the fonts that I have trouble reading. Jack On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:07:33 EST, GenerationGoneBy@cs.com wrote: >In a message dated 2/25/2003 2:05:16 PM Central Standard Time, >lovelacejd@earthlink.net writes: > > >> Teresa, >> >> I have a 19" monitor and I run the window the full width and 90% of the >> depth. The font is to
20. RE: [TMG] tmg gold 5.04 reports [1]
Jeff, Your comment was very inappropriate. Perhaps if you had a loved one who has been sent to the Middle East, you would not think yourself so damn clever! -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Piper [mailto:jeff@piper22.freeserve.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 3:34 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [TMG] tmg gold 5.04 reports I suppose if we don't reside in the US then we will be next on the list after Iraq and N Korea Although the Texas mounties sound interesting......... Jeff Pip
21. Re: [TMG] OT Cold (was Re[2]: 5.04 - Person View font size) [1]
Snow looks very nice on TV, on postcards, in the movies. . And the older I get, the better it looks there also!! Our family wants us to move back to Iowa this summer and I just ask "why?" and proceed to tell them my crocus are in bloom already and what about theirs. That shuts them up for awhile, anyway. Barb Hammer ----- Original Message ----- From: PJNa@aol.com To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] OT Cold (was Re[2]: 5.04 - Person View font size) In a m
22. Re: [TMG] A few silly questions? [1]
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 14:03:01 -0600, strickp@juno.com wrote: >My questions: in my Details box, I've noticed that with >my married females, their "Name - Marr" tag falls after >their "Marr" tag, although they are both the same date. >In my TMG ver 4.0d, my "Name-Marr" tags fell before the >marriage, which helped me to separate each marriage >visually. I'd like to acomplish the same thing in ver 5 >-- is this possible? As Lee suggests, you can change the sort date of one tag or the other. >also in the Det
23. Re: [TMG] Tip of the Day - Editing Tags While Viewing IN [1]
Jeff, This is a great idea. I'm new to TMG and I think it would have taken me quite a few months more for the lightbulb to go off in my head on my own. I am using INs on a daily basis, just about, and this will streamline the process greatly. Of course, it would be nice to not have to close the IN and regenerate it every time a change is made . . . but from an amateur programmer's point of view, I can't imagine how that could be done. Even just viewing web pages, one has to click the Reload butto
24. [TMG] OT Current money VA [1]
Does anyone know where I could find out what the currency was during a certain time period in VA. It was around 1819. Teresa Ghee Elliott Need help with TMG sentences? Click here or go to http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery/
25. RE: [TMG] v5.04 Difference in Number of People [1]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sandie [mailto:sfazio@toast.net] > > I am confused.. > When I look at project summary it says people= 1838. > However, when I run an Ahnentafel report of all people > it says people = 25,372. ????????????? > > Sandie I believe the key is that you're running an Ahnentafel report _of all people_ So you get your own ahnentafel (e.g. 400 people), you also get your dad's ahnentafel (200 people), and your mum's ahnentafel (200 people), then you grandparents (100 each), etc.
Viewing 1-25 of 2,433 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.52992