Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:feb +date:2006)
Viewing 1-25 of 1,075 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: [TMG] 2 computers [1]
Here's what I did when I was using two computers to input to the same database: Put your database in a secure place on line. Before inputting with either computer, download the database and input to it. Upload again at the end of each session. That way all the added material will always be in the database. Richard Pence ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kathi Desko" To: Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:21 AM Subject: [TMG] 2 computers > Hi, all, > > I kn
2. RE: [TMG] PE bug? [1]
Jim I've posted some screen shots on the forum as I can easily reproduce this. But as I say, it's hardly a major, just a quirk. Lorna Henderson Waikanae, NZ -----Original Message----- From: Lorna Henderson [mailto:Lorna.Henderson@paradise.net.nz] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2006 9:08 a.m. To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [TMG] PE bug? Jim, In Teresa's case, I could see that you might suspect a style issue However I only have one other name style in my db and use it on about 2 people total, neith
3. RE: [TMG] Sentence question [1]
Hi John, Yes, after I created a couple of sentences in my new language, the language appeared as an option in TMG Utility. I'd already read the help info on your site, and changed the 2ndsite.ini to include my language, so I am good there. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: John Cardinal [mailto:John@JohnCardinal.com] Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 9:54 AM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [TMG] Sentence question Cheryl Freeman wrote: > I am one baby step further along, as I went to Terry's
4. Re: [TMG] Census Recording Methods [1]
Thanks Ron - I thought I was entering both lines, but on close observation, only the first line took. I've got it now............thanks Carol -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Ron Hamlin > Carol, > Are you entering the complete address? It flows onto two lines in my > email. You need to copy the whole address into your browser's navigation > bar. > Ron Hamlin > > carol.a.collins@comcast.net wrote: > > Teresa -- I've had trouble for two days getting i
5. RE: [TMG] Witness Sentences [1]
Pauline, The witness sentence probably has {M] in it, rather than [WM] If that's not it, you may need to post us the options selected for the report re memos or something Lorna Henderson Waikanae, NZ -----Original Message----- From: Pauline Ballentine [mailto:paulineb@cox.net] Sent: Monday, 27 February 2006 11:48 a.m. To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] Witness Sentences Obviously I haven't worked much with witnesses or witness roles. In construction a marriage sentence using roles everything work
6. Re: [TMG] Married Names [1]
Windsong wrote: >Just curious as to personal opinions about using married names in the indexes. I am considering adding them with John Cardinal's utility. The down side I see is there would be probably almost double the names in each surname in the index. Pros/cons to doing this? Sometimes I would find it really helpful. > snip I always add a married name for a woman as that name is what you will find in most post wedding sources. If you don't want the married names to print in a report, suppress mar
7. Saved Layouts and Toolbard [1]
I carefully saved my complete backup files and restored them when my laptop came back from repair. But the layouts and toolbars weren't restored. I know they used to be saved differently but since it asks if I want to back them up in the backup dialogs I assumed they were now saved with the backup. What should I be saving so I don't have to set it up next computer problem? Cheryl
8. What to do about cousins marring??? [1]
My 4th great grandparents were 1st cousins. When I create an ancestry Journal report everything is great until I get to my 6th great grandparents - than every ancestor prints twice along with all their information. Is their away to prevent this? Thank you for your help, Kathie
9. Ancestor Journal BMDB Abbreviations Use? [1]
In a Journal Report, ancestor direction, TMG 6.07 seems to make no change in the report when the BMDB option on the Tags tab is set to "b. 1861" or "born 1861". Full sentences are apparently used everywhere where BMDB information is given. For the descendant direction the abbreviations apply to those children in the list of children who are carried forward (ref: Terry's response to my post on 14 Feb 2006). Do these abbreviation options have a function in the ancestor direction? If not, shouldn't they be
10. Re: [TMG] Re Adobe 7.0 Standard/TMG [1]
I am considering installing Adobe 7.0 Standard on my computer. Is there any conflict with running TMG and this program? How does the installation of the full Adobe program affect the TMG PDF writer built into TMG? Karen
11. Statement of childlessness [1]
In a journal report, when there are no children linked to a couple, the journal report includes a statement that they had no children (or no "known" children if you select that option). How do I supress this statement? In most cases the couple actually did have children but I'm just not recording them because they are not in a line I'm following any further. Bill Teschek teschek@alumni.unh.edu
12. Re: [TMG] Beginners question [1]
http://tmg.reigelridge.com/AlphaIndex.htm Thanks to everyone who has suggested this site- I'm just reading through it now and it's exactly what I was looking for! Things are slowly starting to make sense. I have 2 notebooks and 2 folders of information to put on the programme and for the past four hours I have been staring at page one of notebook one and not getting anywhere. I wonder why TMG don't produce a basic guide like this, it would be so much more helpful, although I'm sure once I've grasped
13. RE: [TMG] End of Sentence Codes - a Second Proposa [1]
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:12:28 -0700, Kym Lister wrote: > Thanks for the info -- WOW that can mean having to create > twice the number of custom sentences than are needed! > I'm a minimalist and hate creating anything custom within > TMG as it increases the margin for inconsistencies -- any > chance Wholly Genes will fix this? Fix what? Terry Reigel
14. RE: [TMG] Re: Comma trouble [1]
I put cause of death in the memo also as the last item and a separate sentence. Assuming that it is extremely rare that you would have an output sentence that is "He died.", perhaps you could always make sure that you include a circa (or between) date IF you decide to use the tag. If that is the case perhaps a reordering of the sentence gets you where you want to be... He died between 1909 and 1920, of tuberculosis. Would be [P] died< [D]><, [M1]>. (I didn't put in the rest of the variables.) I have n
15. Re: [TMG] How can I find census candidates for a particular year? [1]
Sue Hilton wrote: > > >>3. Where is the "List of all Names" report? >> >> > >Chuck, I think in TMG 6.07 you may want to try the List of People report to >find the people eligible for the census. > Chuck does want the List of names. lotherwise he would no have any of the married women in his report. bob gillis
16. RE: [TMG] Wishful thinking list [1]
DeAnna Burghart wrote: > the Department of Redundancy Department. Lee Hoffman/KY TMG Tips: My website: A user of the best genealogy program, The Master Genealogist (TMG)
17. Re: Re; [TMG]Widh List Sorting Tags [1]
Teresa Elliott wrote: > Chris, > My question is what do you do when you want to use a NON-NEHGS report? I > still think that you would be better off proposing how you would like the > report to print, UNLESS like Bob said you want your PV to look similarly. > I'd rather leave the PV in chronological order and then have a report output > the tags the way I want. > I am not saying you shouldn't be able to do what you want, I am just not > sure that sorting of tags is the issue. It seems that it would c
18. Re: [TMG] Wishful thinking list [1]
In a message dated 2/9/2006 4:31:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, TMG-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: At times I almost wish TMG had ONE more window, for people who were not > related to the person, but who lived in the household. They could be > linked > via some special tag that would create a residency link to the person. Doesn't the Association tag do that? John H
19. RE: [TMG] Sentence question [1]
Cheryl Freeman wrote: > What Second Site is doing is moving all my BMDB group tags to > the top, so that in addition to BMDB sentences with dates and > locations, I have christening, marriage bond, divorce, > obituary, and probate sentences. Not quite as clean as I had > hoped, as I truly want that first paragraph to be BMDB only, > with marriage bond, divorce, obit, probate, etc sentences in > the section below BMDB. > > While I understand the logic (both in TMG and Second Site) > for this result,
20. RE: [TMG] Place Style Warning message [1]
Richard, I agree with you. To me Near Rutherford County, TN and In Rutherford County, TN are two separate places. I guess that's why I never had a problem with place styles and creating several places for one place. Teresa Ghee Elliott-IBSSG -----Original Message----- From: Richard Damon [mailto:richard@damon-family.org] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 9:39 AM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [TMG] Place Style Warning message It is not an "official" way, but I just put the preposition I want in L
21. Third option on Data Set merge [1]
I believe that there use to be a third option when merging data sets. Didn't we have the option to merge two data sets (projects) and at the end have the merged one plus both of the others intact? Why did that change? What do people do when they want that option? Thanks! Tanya
22. RE: [TMG] End of Sentence Codes - location of "No Caps" code [1]
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 Donald Joseph Schulteis wrote: > Users beware, the program as it is presently designed > cannot support this "minds eye" requirement. (a sentence > variable in one tag affect a specific sentence of another > tag) Yes, Donald, we know that, which is one reason for the current proposal. > Should such a variable(s) be supported, I have > reservations as there is no outputting predictability. I don't understand that statement - the proposed variables would cause output exactly as they a
23. Re: [TMG] Accent for Flags [1]
Lee Hoffman wrote: > Chris Sackett wrote: > >> I make good use of the accent feature for names and find it very >> helpful for identifying the various family lines. How about adding the >> accent feature to flag values? A quick glance at my various editing >> flags to see if they were red for no, green for yes, or amber for >> don't know, would be very useful. > > > For TMG to somehow have that as standard may not suit all users. But it > is available now. You just need to set them up. Are you h
24. Re: OT [TMG] Heritage Quest - Godfrey Library [1]
When Godfrey made the announcement a couple of months back, one place that started to find alternatives was Dick Eastman's Encyclopedia of Genealogy. A page devoted to HeritageQuest, with remote access was set up. There are quite a few libraries that have access, but there are gaps. You usually need to be a member/library card holder to gain access. Most libraries require that you apply in person. There are several gen. societies that include remote access in their membership benefits. Explore & see wha
25. RE: [TMG] Wishful thinking list [1]
Lee, I think what you would do is have a tag similar to a relationship tag that would link individuals. If a person was linked to Bob Jones via this tag, then they would show in the window. I don't think it should be created because of a certain tag, like census, but rather the user would need to create the residence relationship tag. I wouldn't want children and spouses in this window, just other people who lived in the household. When I created the census tag and realized that Sarah Smith was living
Viewing 1-25 of 1,075 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.539918