Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:jan +date:2003)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,885 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. RE: [TMG] my requirements [1]
> -----Original Message----- > From: ACP [mailto:acpearce@io.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 5:36 PM > To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [TMG] my requirements > ... > The issue is that, IMHO, the problems with TMG working > on it's native OSes/DBMS should have been resolved. > Customers should not be forced to migrate to an unfinished > product, to get TMG to work on those OSes/DBMS. > Unfortunately, the only fix to this problem that Wholly Genes can do is a complete re-write like they are doin
2. FW: [TMG] Picklist speed [1]
-----Original Message----- From: Bryan Wetton [mailto:beedub@adelaide.on.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 7:40 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] Picklist speed >From TMG-L The following message caused me to look at this again >To open a pick list is 12+ seconds. >Typing in the surname for a pick list is not even something I like to think about. > It seems to me that the filter is being applied after each letter is > typed. > > IMHO TMG should wait for a reasonable delay time before doing a fil
3. Re: [TMG] Re:TMG 5.04 Vertical Scrolling Speed- This is getting irritating! [1]
Robert Heiling wrote: >So I sit here now wondering why someone would *snip* the context and not >use per commonly accepted practice and then not address the >question that was being asked. > >Color me puzzled. You have had a couple of answers to your main question. Further responses are not forthcoming probably because no one here has an answer and/or others here cannot replicate the problem. At this point, the suggestion made to address your question directly to Tech Support is probably the
4. Re: [TMG] 5.04 Invisible Witness (Bug?) [1]
Yes, Bug. Identical experience...solution was exactly the same.....was reported... But I had a similar "Phantom" presence on Person view yesterday when a death tag "disappeared" completely from the list of tags for that person. I closed the application out, restarted it and did a file integrity check...and (after "fixing") it came back.....but I regard such encounters with some degree of concern, since data loss has sometimes occurred after similar "fixes" have taken place.....and that has been reported a
5. Re: [TMG] Flag choice default question [1]
Patricia wrote: > >>This is actually happening. I have removed the '?' from both places. When > >>I hit 'OK' it pops back into the choice string as the last choice. A,B,C,? > >> > >>It does not reappear in the description box. It does not seem to hurt > >>anything, it is just there with nothing attached to it. The defaults I > >>have set are working. and Lee responded: > >I suggest that you select File=>Maintenance=>Validate File Integrity and > >see if that doesn't help. to which Patricia replied:
6. [TMG] Genbox (was Up date????) [1]
At 06:54 PM 1/16/03 -0500, Ron Bernier wrote: >Hi Pat, > >As a follow-up to my response, you can go to www.genbox.com, or >www.thoughtfulcreations.com, both addresses are for the same site. > >Regards, >Ron Bernier Hi: I find it interesting that Genbox 3.0 (a beta product) is compared with TMG 5.04 (a pre-released product). From what I can see, the comparison chart vis-a-vis TMG 5 appears accurate but is also quite misleading. The problem is that it is TMG 5.04 -- so one sees a lot of "no" entries for
7. Re: [TMG] census construction -- roles v. memos? [1]
At 05:07 PM 1/7/2003 -0500, James P. Colgate wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Peter B.Hill" > > What I don't understand is why you are putting these details into the CD, > > rather than in a sentence for the witness. The way I do it, the [CD] is >the > > same for all: head of household and witnesses. What you lose in this is >the > > ability to specify separate sureties for each household member, but this > > seems a small price to pay to keep from having to prepare multi
8. Re: [TMG] Sort dates, reply to Bob (medium) [1]
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:34:17 EST AGH3RD@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/7/03 11:25:45 AM Central > Standard Time, > morgan@usroots.com writes: > >> Then why not just take a vote, decide what >> people want, implement it (or leave it as is), >> and be done with it? >> >> Morgan > > A vote among whom? > > TMG Users? > Professional Genealogists? > The genealogical community? > The general population? > > While I don't care for the fact that rather > specialized meanings have been assigned to the >
9. Re: [TMG] SID images [1]
On 1/2/03, at 17:03, Richard Brogger wrote: >As far as I know, that leaves one option. Link the .SID images using >OLE. How well that will work for you depends on how you intend to use >the images. If your goal is just to view them from within TMG, OLE >will work. Hmmm. Will they also print in reports? Even if not, I probably wouldn't want a great number to print and I could convert those one at a time. But I don't know how to set up an OLE link. Can you help? I'm hoping someday .SID will have a few mor
10. [TMG] Descendant Narrative [1]
I am currently out of focuses but need to include more people in my on-line tree. Can someone please step me, in baby steps, through how to do it under 4.0d. Ian Singer -- ======================================================================== See my homepage at http://www.iansinger.com Join the iansinger_relatives@iansinger.com mailing list with msg to Iansinger_relatives-request@iansinger.com & in body subscribe I am near Toronto Canada, can I tell where you are from your
11. RE: [TMG] General tags or VERY specific tags? [1]
> From: Lee Hoffman [mailto:lhoffman@acm.org] > > Linda Gaylord-Kuhn wrote: > >Same here. So, wouldn't it be *nice* to have "by" promoted to the > >official rank of Regular? Since it's so often needed/used? >with VBG> > > Well, I wouldn't mind. But, first, it is a low priority for me. And > second, the reason it is low priority is that I really don't use it > much. Probably a half dozen times in a data set of 37,000 persons. It > was > one or two more about a year ago when I found more in
12. Re: [TMG] Cause of Death [1]
Jann G wrote: >I would just like opinions on including the cause of death with the death >record? I am undecided as to adding these facts to the family tree? As a number of messages have stated, many users place the cause of death in the Memo field of the Death tag, There are many others that have created a Custom Dth-Cause tag and enter the cause of death in the Memo field of that tag. You can then decide on a report by report basis whether to include that tag in the report or not. Hope this helps
13. Re: [TMG] TMG V5.04 Question [1]
Beth, Well, you were correct. I outfoxed the system and called the father-role "dad" and it worked like a charm. Looks like TMG has a problem with roles starting with "father" (in the same tag). Perhaps they will have it fixed before the next release. Hope so! Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "beth" To: Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:57 PM Subject: RE: [TMG] TMG V5.04 Question > Pat, > > In that same tag, do you already have another role that be
14. Re: [TMG] IBID Bug - was Sources - TMG 4d [1]
Stuart, > Why would one want to say Ibid, and then report only part of the detail? That's why I said to reserve CD1 for the entire detail. If used like this, the Ibid. line will have what you want. CD contents: page 101: 160 acres on the west bank of Slippery Creek||page 101||160 acres on the west bank of Slippery Creek You are using CD1||CD2||CD3 CD1 will be output on Ibid. lines with differing citation detail, as unique endnotes and to GEDCOMs. Jim
15. [TMG] Precise dates of things like dying [1]
I was thinking of a quote by Wittgenstein which runs something like "That which I do not know, thereof I should not speak." So...to draw the discussion in a different direction, instead of saying he died after 1674 (when he signed his will, for example), but we could mean he did die in 1674 after he signed his will, if I understand the discussion, which I do not claim to do, why not say, THE LAST RECORDED EVENT IN X'S LIFE WAS THE SIGNING OF HIS WILL ON ______. Or, the last historical record we have for M
16. RE: [TMG] <[M]> Variable [1]
Teresa - I agree about Richard's original idea to be able to use footnote codes. My suggestion--in the alternative--was made in light of the fact that (1) no such provision exists and (2) such "coding" may never be implemented. CheriC -----Original Message----- From: GenerationGoneBy@cs.com [mailto:GenerationGoneBy@cs.com] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:21 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [TMG] <[M]> Variable In a message dated 1/31/2003 1:47:53 PM Central Standard Time, clcasper@sprynet.com wr
17. RE: [TMG] Image Management (outside TMG) Another Way [1]
Another way to handle Images: I publish my genealogies to a CD and not to the WWW. I use The Master Genealogists (TMG) as may primary repository of all my data except photographs. Many genealogy programs do a satisfactory job on handling most data with the exceptions of photographs. I wanted a program that would create web pages that I could place on the CD to allow the viewer to search thru the thousands of individual photos I have scanned. I wanted something reliable, easy to work with, capable of ha
18. Re: [TMG] V4.d DESCENDANT JOURNAL NARRATIV [1]
In a message dated 1/28/03 11:07:34 AM Central Standard Time, Djschulteis@aol.com writes: > I bit this exact bullet for my B/bap/M/D/Bu tags adding a BirthMemo, > BapMemo, > MarrigeMemo, DeathMemo, and BurialMemo custom tag the their respective tag > group. I then removed the memo from the original tag and placed it in its > companion tag aligning the companion tag using an after date of the primary > > tag. > > Most definitely not something you want to look forward to as it takes > considerable
19. Re: [TMG] GenBridge [1]
William Boswell asked: > Does GenBridge work well with both TMG 4 and 5? I had always wondered how > useful GenBridge might be between TMG and other programs. Genbridge is an import technology that obvious requires considerable tuning to work correctly with importing the database from a given program. Pocket Genealogist (the 2.50 beta) uses GenBridge to import both TMG4 and TMG5 databases. PG is the only program outside of TMG4/5 that uses GenBridge as far as I know. Jim
20. Re: [TMG] Roles (yet again) with suggested improvement [1]
[RG:Witness] is news to me. With your caveat, I will keep it in mind and use where appropriate. Karla At 10:05 AM 1/20/03 -0500, you wrote: >>2) Regular role-less witnesses be specifiable by full name, first name, >>pronoun, etc. so that one does not need to start the witness sentence >>with [W] in order to be grammatically correct. In other words, add >>variables like [WG], [WF], [WP], etc. > >Well, you can today, with limits. You can use [RG:Witness], for example, >to get the given name of an ordi
21. Re: [TMG] Source Element Groups [1]
Hi Alice, I'm also in v.4.0d. I find data input difficult for sources unless the name of the source element is descriptive enough to remind me what I intended to go in each field of the source definition. So I have liberally added new souce elements (e.g. [Census line num], etc.), and therefore have had to deal with (a lot!) the problem you describe, namely when two or more desired elemnets are in the same source element group. What I do is just to create a new source element, adding it to a source ele
22. Re: [TMG] IrfranView was Image sizing question - SID>TIFF>TMG4 [1]
> > > but when I try to install it I get an error message, > > >"Can't find IrfanView folder." > > There are two installation programs. The iview375.exe installs IrfanView. The all_plugins.exe installs the plug-ins. It almost sounds like your are running the plugin installer first. Bob
23. [TMG] Central Florida TMG Users Group Meeting [1]
The Central Florida TMG Users Group will meet this Saturday, Jan. 25, at the Orlando Public Library, third floor meeting rooms from 1 PM to 4 PM. We discuss TMG 4.0d, 5.03, Utilities, Second Sight, genealogy methods, computers, weather, philosophy, food, etc. Email for more information, if needed. Regards, Francis Keenan Leesburg, Fl. fkeenan@earthlink.net
24. [TMG] Should I switch to TMG5? [1]
I've had TMG5 for some time now but have not switched to it because some of the most useful reports are not available. I notice from the list that many people have switched, and some seem to be using John Cardinal's Second Site to supplement the reports. Now it seems to be time to switch; there is some indication that the missing reports will be added in the next two or three months, which would be soon enough for me. My work is virtually complete, as far as I intend to take it. Would anyone care to commen
25. Re: [TMG] Printing data set [1]
-------Original Message------- From: Derreck Peters Sent: 01/13/03 06:02 AM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] Printing data set > > If you wanted to print "all" the data that you have entered > (ver 4.0d), what would be the most efficient way to achieve > this? Many thanks.. > > Derreck Hi, Derreck: If you find answers based solely on TMG itself do not do what you want, you might try using John Cardinal's "Second Site". It is available on the Wholly Genes web store. The output i
Viewing 1-25 of 2,885 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.58991