Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:jun +date:2000)
Viewing 1-25 of 1,538 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [TMG] witnesses [1]
I need help, please, "linking" four people who appear on one passport. This family immigrated to the US from Great Britain and all four (husband, wife, two children) are identified on a single British passport. I have created a custom tag PASSPORT, assigned to the husband, with wife and each child as witnesses. The sentence syntax is: [P1] appears on a passport with [WO]. My individual narrative report for the husband works, i.e., generates this sentence: "Husband appears on a passport with Wife, Ch
2. [TMG] names in suffix field [1]
I have been corresponding with Sherri Hessick--who thought up the idea of using names in the suffix field--about the recent problems brought up with the list. She worked on it for awhile, and with her permission, here is what she found: [BTW, she submitted it to WG techs too] (snip) What we WANT is the maiden name in the suffix field of the Name-Marr tag, AND the married name in the suffix of the primary name tag. Right?? At least from the 2 messages you sent to me, it looks like this is what you and Ed
3. Re: [TMG] names in suffix field [1]
FYI--here is the answere Sherri got from TMG techs: Rondie, Here is the answer I received from WG about the suffix problem. Not a very satisfying answer, but at least we know it will eventually be fixed. Sherri > Hi Sherri, > > Thank you for writing in detail what is happening. This problem is known by the programers and will have to be fixed in a future version. > > I will forward your message to the programers. >R ************************************************** >I have been corresponding with Sher
4. Re: [TMG] Ideas, please! [0.970203]
Hi Gene, Without knowing what software you use, my answer may not fit. I use Netscape and when I want to save a message, I right click on the message and select "Forward Inline". This gives me a copy without extra marks. I then delete extra material and save the trimmed message and move it to my TMG folder. Richard EFHRP@aol.com wrote: > > Have just subscribed toTMG-L@rootsweb and am OVERWHELMED by all the traffic I > receive. Have tried to read all of it and would like to save the "goodies" > for fu
5. Re: [TMG] "Glitch" with date entry?? [0.970203]
Bud Dorr wrote: >I think it happens only when you add birth information at the same time (on the >same screen) as when you add the new person. Now I always add the person first, >then add the birth, and I stopped having that problem. Of course, it shouldn't >happen, but there's a workaround. I add birth data most of the time to new persons often and have not experience the situation. So there must be something else. ---------- Lee Hoffman/KY E-mail: lhoffman@acm.org TMG Tips:
6. Re: [TMG] Citations & Sources [0.970203]
Ronald Strout wrote: >I have a general question on citations and sources. I assume all Citations >must reference a source. What is the recommended way to enter birth >certificates and marriage certificates? That is which information goes >where? The TMG Tips website's (URL below) TMG Proprietary page has a page of Source Templates for the Mills Source Categories and the Lackey Source Categories. These pages show each Source Category and the TMG Templates designed by Wholly Genes as well as some example
7. [TMG] Thanks for the help !! [0.970203]
Re: [TMG] large data base with no outputs ? Thanks to your help, I think I finally get the report generation methods for TMG. My recommendation to other potential users of TMG, go to this board first ! You will save your sanity and progress much faster. It is not as hard as it seems ________________________________________________________________________________ Jim Rader, 2633 Gilbert Way - Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-3513 (916) 366-6833
8. Re: [TMG] CRW: source type = baptism [0.970203]
Jeff wrote: > How do I create a query to find all sources in the MSL whith source type = > baptism? > "List of Sources" doesn't seem to offer that choice. > I can choose "Source Type is" for field, but for operator the choices do not > include "=" so I can't make the value "baptism" work in this query. You might filter for "Title" Contains [?] with the List of Sources, or you could try the List of Citations report, filtering for "Linked Event: Tag Type Label" Contains [?] The latter won't list sourc
9. [TMG] [Fwd: CST13243723ID - TMG Beta Testers] [0.970203]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AB6FDEF539DDEA65CBDCFF09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit for those of you on the beta test list. listbot just send me this response to my question about their server ________________________________________________________________________________ Jim Rader, 2633 Gilbert Way - Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-3513 (916) 366-6833 --------------AB6FDEF539DDEA65CBDCFF09 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transf
10. Re: [TMG] Report with adopted children [0.970203]
BettyAlbright wrote: >I have been presented with problem. >We want a narrative report with spouse events, so I have checked this item, >which includes information about her. >The spouse has adopted 4 children after the death of her husband. We wish to >have these children included with the spouse information. >How do we set up the filters. The problem is not so much the filters of a report as the fact that the adopted children are not part of the husband's family. That is, he is not shown as a Primary par
11. [TMG-L:] Test [0.970203]
This is a test message. Please see my TMG-L Announcement message if you haven't already. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Doyle | "I do not feel obligated to believe that the same tdoyle@doit.com | God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and | intellect has intended us to forego their use." | --Galileo Galilei
12. RE: [TMG] "Glitch" with date entry?? [0.970203]
Hi Bob, I'll try and answer to the best of my memory: 1) I almost always leave the screen by pressing F10 (My normal route through the screen is: add name, add birth date, add death date if I have any, normally tab-ing through all these, then add citation by pressing F4, and leaving that by F10, and leave it all by F10 once more.) 2) I can't say I have noticed, but the cursor would normally be left somewhere midways in the tour of the screen when I press F4 to go to the citation screen. Sometimes, I have h
13. Re: [TMG] large data base with no outputs ? [0.970203]
Linda Lawhon wrote: >The bottom line here is -- I make too many mistakes when entering >material and I have not always been consistent in how I have entered >material so I need to put my reports into a word processor where I >can easily (?) find those errors and correct them. I agree and have the same problem. So I periodically go to the Master Place List (and other lists) and review it for inconsistencies. A lot of consistancy is lost in the way that data is entered. I found that after I created a
14. [TMG] help with filter.....again [0.970203]
Once again I cannot figure out a filter, and need to presume on the help of wiser heads. I am trying to do a timeline of all events in one family; i.e. one person and his decendants for 4 generation. I just want a list of years in chronological order and what happened to the family for each. Am I the only one who can't get onto this filter thing? I never see anyone else submitting filter questions. Jane Sarles
15. Re: [TMG] a report UFT called a Family Journal [0.970203]
Jim Rader said: >I am trying to get what UFT called a "Family Journal" >could someone please tell me the steps in TMG I'd be happy to tackle this question except that I don't know how it differs from the question and the answers you've received from me, Lee Hoffman, Will Pratt, and Bob Sawyer on the other thread. I'm guessing that the messages passed each other online? -Bob
16. RE: [TMG] HTML [0.970203]
Harry -- I presume you kept your data in UFT (now transferring/transferred to TMG, since you're on this list?) and the passed data via GEDCOM to Pro-Gen. Right? Have you tried this from TMG? Any problems with fields not being transferred correctly. Thanks in advance for the info. John At 18:18 22/06/00, you wrote: > > > I made my homepage with UFT and added a few charts to it from another > > > program (Pro-Gen) which are in my opinion worth seeing. The charts are >in > >a > > > form of pedigree
17. Re: [TMG] Date problems [0.970203]
Jennie, > When I enter a birthdate in the very first screen and okay it to store it, I am finding that about 80% of the time it works fine but the rest of the time is doesn't carry over to the sort date and sometimes the birth date doesn't register at all and it is blank on the person view. I have to go back into the birth details screen and re-enter it and then it works fine. I have spoken to another lady who has the same problems. This is a known bug in v4.0. I wrote a detailed description of the proble
18. Re: [TMG] Custom Tags [0.970203]
At 01:02 PM 06/13/2000 -0400, you (Karla Huebner ) wrote: >This reminds me to add that I use an XCensus tag which says I didn't find a >person on a specific census (Esther Nelson was not found on the 1920 Clay >County, MN census). I don't use it often but it's very handy for people who >are expected to show up and don't. [snip] Oooooo, I *LIKE* it! Darrell Darrell A. Martin no longer proud to have been a Vermonter but still proud of my Vermont roots currently in exile in A
19. Re: [TMG] Thinking about buying TMG [0.970203]
John, On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 17:51:52 -0500 "John Steiger" writes: > I am thinking about buying TMG, I am presently using PAF. I consider > myself > an advanced computer user. I have been monitoring the mailing list > for the > last couple of days. I get the feeling that TMG is quite powerful, > but > difficult to use. Is this a correct assumption? My experience with _any_ software program has been that "powerful" and "easy to use" are mutually exclusive terms. Yes, TMG
20. Re: [TMG] "Was of" event --> tag (UFT alert!) [0.970203]
William Roberts wrote: >> [P1] [M] married [P2] <[PARO]> <[D]> <[L]> <[M]> >> >snip.... > >Lee, did you mean to have the <[M]> at the end of the "you would have it >like" example above or just after the [P1]? Oops! Sorry! I used copy/paste and forgot to delete the <[M]> at the end. It should be: [P1] [M] married [P2] <[PARO]> <[D]> <[L]> ---------- Lee Hoffman/KY E-mail: lhoffman@acm.org TMG Tips: My website: -------------- A use
21. [TMG] Re: TMG-L: Re: True Marriage [0.970203]
Will the True Marriage people please write each other directly and leave the rest of us out of your discussions? DL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TMG-L The Internet Mailing List for The Master Genealogist To unsubscribe: Send an e-mail to majordomo@doit.com with 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L' or... if you get the digest version: 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L-DIGEST' -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. [TMG-L:] RE: TMG-L: List of people [0.970203]
David Grawrock wrote: >But this only works if you have death dates for everyone. I don't. Many of >the people I'm concerned with don't have death dates yet in the database. So >without a death date how does one do this. If you have birth dates, you can look at people born after, say 90 years before the target date and born before the target date. Or adjust the range of dates as you wish. If you don't have birth dates, you need to look at other events, say marriage within forty years on either side of th
23. [TMG] TMGW v5.0 Demo [0.970203]
jesse.moore@eudoramail.com wrote: >So tell us please, Lee, what is in 5! > >We are dying out here to know! > >Is the interface a true Visual Basic one finally? Are data >refreshes/database accesses more seemless than with 4? Has the GUI changed >much? > >Get any screen captures? ;-> I don't think I can improve on the report given by Jim Byrum here on Monday. He summed up the demo session very well. As has been noted on here previously, TMGW v5.0 is being written in Visual FoxPro. I can't really commen
24. [TMG-L:] Re: TMG-L: Tags [0.970203]
After reading other responses may I give another view. If I have no death date and have a legal "after death action date" I add a death tag using the date modifiers before or between depending upon other information I might have. This information can be suitably sourced. As for the will itself the first binding date is the recorded date (remember a person can write more than one will during his life time) and this is the will date I use. I generally insert the text of the will in a memo and mark it for
25. [TMG] Wishlist - VCF Date Option [0.970203]
I'm making up some charts using Visual Chartform to put a a T-shirt (don't get me into why ) and readability is an issue. I want to put in the boxes only names and birth - death dates in the form "1851 - 1915". So far as I can tell , there is no option to show both dates on the same line, nor to show only the years, so I'm editing them manually. This may be a rather special application, but it seems to me that this is a useful option to squeeze at least a little helpful information into any chart where
Viewing 1-25 of 1,538 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.579912