Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:mar +date:2000)
Viewing 1-25 of 1,005 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: TMG-L: Oddball use of TMG [1]
That was me...I am almost done with my project, and found it worked wonderfully to organize my material. This is how I did it, there is no URL, but maybe you'll get some ideas. (If you wish, I can e-mail you a .sqz file, so you can see the result) 1) copied the ancestor who had Civil War service, and deleted almost all the events in the clone's life. I left birth, marriage and death, since I intended to include those events in the written product. This clone is where all of the threads will be apparent,
2. Re: TMG-L: verifying a date 1665/66 or 1666/67 [0.971333]
Geeez, I thought had a handle on this date stuff but I'm finding out that I'm not quite as smart as I thought I was. You're all coming up with the answer I want but I can't figure out how you get it. According to the Calendar zone (thanks Bev) and Elizabeth Sat. 19 Jan falls on Saturday in 1667 in the Julian calendar. Everyone is telling me that this is 1666/67 and that's what I want to hear but if it's '67 julian, wouldn't that be '68 Gregorian? In other words 1667/68 (which doesn't work at all for my
3. Re: TMG-L: HP LaserJet 2100 [0.971333]
At 22:39 29/02/00 -0700, Thomas Kryssbek wrote: >I just purchased a HP LaserJet 2100 and am having problems getting TMG >to work correctly with it. All my other applications work fine with >this printer. It appears that TMG is sending a manual print code or does >not default to the paper tray. When I send a print command, I get an >error message that the printer is out of paper; however, when I press >"GO" on the printer, the document prints. > Thomas, This is known problem of CRW/TMG when printing from t
4. Re: TMG-L: verifying a date 1665/66 or 1666/67 [0.971333]
According to Callisto, January 19 was a Saturday in 1666/1667. John ------ John O'Neall Genas, France http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~joneall/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Norb Bankert To: Sent: Wednesday, 01 March, 2000 02:14 Subject: TMG-L: verifying a date 1665/66 or 1666/67 > I may be stretching it a little by posting this question here but I'm hoping > to tap into the superior intelligence of this group. > > I have an ancestor who was born in Connecticut o
5. Re: TMG-L: verifying a date 1665/66 or 1666/67 [0.971333]
>Surely if the year was stated in OS/NS fashion, > only one was given. Unfortunately both were given. I may have not have been clear on this. Her birth is listed in VR's as 19 Jan 1666 The handwritten documents concerning her birth (and death of her mother) states "he was there on Thursdaye ye 17th of this month". Hence the 19'th was Saturday. This document bears a date "30th Jany 1666/7". However, when these documents are mailed to Mr. Nathaniell Gold Att., the envelope is dated "Februery 1665/6". Whi
6. Re: TMG-L: Visual Chartform [0.971333]
Does your local HS have a CAD Department with a plotter. How about making a GedCom file and printing it out after school on their plotter. You pay taxes, so with a big grin, and kind words, they might let you use it. Happy Bone Hunting in 2000 GFS LindaE/OH GFS LindaE@aol.com Learning The Master Genealogist Software Researching the following and many more. O'BRIENS, JENNINGS, CALNAN'S, QUINNS, O'SULLIVAN/s, SULLIVAN, O'SHEA, SHEA, ROONEY, HOY, McALISTERS to name a few. -----------------------
7. Re: TMG-L: Adding Siblings Without Parents [0.971333]
> > But, don't you have at least a surname for their father? > In these situations we often do have a surname, but using the reasoning put forth in these arguments I can extend all my families back 700 or 800 years just by continually adding fathers as "(unknown) Doe". I have many families where I know siblings but don't know the parents. I think we should be able to add siblings to a family without having to add a completely unknown individual. Norb - --------------------------------------------
8. Re: TMG-L: Re: Linking associated 'people': firms, address histories [0.971333]
Message text written by INTERNET:tmg-l@doit.com >When this "Individual Text' is imported into TMG, it ended up being placed in a tag called Biography. It means it is printed in the tag section and appears every time that individual's tags are generated. If it is a long narrative, it results in a large amount of white space to the left of the tag.< De-select the printing of the biography tag for that report, would be the simplest solution. >I wish that were a way to print a single tag of the SUBJECT of a
9. Re: TMG-L: A newbie vs a 10 page document [0.971333]
My understanding is that Exchange is the overall name (or was) for the overall Acrobat package. Capture is part of it. Maybe they've changed the nomenclature with 4.0? Anyway, it is all Acrobat stuff but usually when I say Acrobat people think I mean the free Reader software, which is only one piece. Karla Message text written by INTERNET:tmg-l@doit.com >Can't find any mention of Exchange on Adobe's web site. Could this product have changed names? Might it be what is now called "Adobe Acrobat Capture" (
10. TMG-L: Negative (no luck) reasearch sources [0.971333]
I have read with interest how people create 'dummy' persons for things like census records and such. What I would like to do is somehow record a reasearch source that has no connections; I've looked at the source and found no connection at all. I want to be able to keep a record of this source however and want to list the surnames I'm did the search on, along with various spelling variations, the date searched, the source of the source (web site, library, etc), and I would also like to list any found surna
11. Re: TMG-L: Startup options problem [0.971333]
Dave Nelson wrote: >On startup I often find TMG closing down, apparently for a failure to find a >default data set. Sometimes I can stop this event by typing the letter 'S' >which goes into a startup sequence (but this doesn't work everytime). And >having used the 'S' process, the next time I run TMG I have to go thru the >whole thing again. > >Any way to correct this? > >For background, my only dataset is in tmg\data; I have moved files around on >occasion and when I do, I always have the described probl
12. Re: TMG-L: Glasses for Computer Viewing [0.971333]
bob gillis wrote: > > I have worn for several years Varilux lenses that uniformly grade > between the upper distance vision and the lower reading vision. They > are somewhat pricy but if you don't want to wear a supplemental lense > they are great. > Trouble with them is as you get older and your eyes worsen they need to get stronger for close-up and so the field of view gets much narrower. E.g. I could not see both ends of my car dashboard and end up looking like Mr. Data as you swivel head side to sid
13. Re: TMG-L: Relative Auto-Tag Problem [0.971333]
Rae Jean Hay wrote: >Have a problem while using the "Relative Auto-Tag" feature that I setup >under "System Configuration - Tags folder tab". The person ID #10 selected >is myself. >This is my problem: >When I start TMG in the Person View of a subject (not myself), if I move to >the Tree View of that subject - all is okay. >If I move from the Person View of a subject (not myself), to the Family View >of the selected subject - TMG moves from the selected subject to my Family >View. > >Example Person View to
14. Re: TMG-L: Gedcom assistance [0.971333]
Hi John, You asked about the FTM CD's. I have a few bundles that my husband bought me for Mother's Day. I haven't been successful with them. But then my cousin, a male with a different last name, found two trees that connected with his surname on his dads side of the family. I'm from the mothers side. So there you have it. I don't think they are worth it -- he does. LindaE - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TMG-L The Internet Mailing
15. TMG-L: Notes vs Occupation [0.971333]
I just realized that I can only have one (1) primary occupation. If a person held several occupations as his life progressed, then how is one primary. Non-primary tag are overlooked in reports (option) to avoid too much info. It will print all notes. So, why am I not better off recording occupations as notes. Have others found one (1) primary occupation a problem? I want to have a good view of their life timeline. Thanks. ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE
16. Re: TMG-L: VCF Charts [0.971333]
Great Idea, Robin! I was trying to figure out how to word such a request myself. Sure hope Bob implements your plan. Cathy In a message dated 03-Mar-00 3:15:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, Robin.Lamacraft@cmst.csiro.au writes: << At 04:26 3/03/00 -0500, AGH3RD@aol.com wrote: >In a message dated 03/03/2000 3:24:46 AM Central Standard Time, >carvolth@gil.com.au writes: > > > Is there an easy way to shift the chart so that page breaks are always on > > connecting lines rather than through the box
17. Re: TMG-L: Photos & Other Exhibits [0.971333]
At 07:34 PM 3/2/2000 -0800, you wrote: >Linda - I tried that. This time the "links" option under edit was available >to me. I clicked it and did everything that should have worked. I got a >blank box in my document. Any ideas? I know the picture is there because I >can do to my individual record and see my picture! (I generated a report on >myself only as a test.) Any more ideas? > >Anyone else out there got any ideas??? Be sure that you are in 'Page Layout' on the 'View' menu. It has been some ti
18. Re: TMG-L: Question [0.971333]
Thanks Lisa I have not got around to installing or using that part of TMG but I will do so. ciao. doug. Lissa Soergel wrote: > At 08:18 PM 3/8/2000 -0700, Linda Kralman-Lambert wrote: > > >Ancestry has a very good book called "Concise Genealogical > >Dictionary"....compiled by Maurine and Glen Harris....it cost me $14.95 at > >a local seminar and is worth every penny and then some. > > This is one of the free databases supplied with TMG (except the Silver > Edition). Just put CD Disk #2 into your CD driv
19. TMG-L: Tag sentences [0.971333]
I have changed some tag sentences. They are longer than the window that shows the sentence. If I go back to modify the sentence, how can I get the sentence to scroll past the right side so I can change something beyond that point? Thanks JD Howard Roswell, NM - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TMG-L The Internet Mailing List for The Master Genealogist To unsubscribe: Send an e-mail to majordomo@doit.com with 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L' or...
20. RE: TMG-L: Web publishing questions [0.971333]
Bill Waggoner said: > Does someone have a good report strategy for publishing on web pages? So > far I've come up with reports that are HUGE or millions (well, maybe not > millions!) of little bitty files. Seems like a compromise should be > possible. My database only has a few hundred people in it, it's > really not that large! If you aren't afraid of getting into the html and modifying it, you might want to consider family groups with links. To get an idea of what I mean, check my page - check out fol
21. Re: TMG-L: Land transactions [0.971333]
Bob, I have created tags such as: deed, land grant, bounty land, land entry, land contract, etc. I usually type out my Sentences. I may log as a person the opposite of the grantor or grantee if he/she is family or allied to family. Same goes for adjoining landowners, whom I would list as Witnesses if they were family or allied to family. Frankie Liles << Can anyone give me ideas and hints on how they record land transactions in > TMG? I have just done my first land record research and am not sure w
22. TMG-L: IRELAND Source templates for Civil Registrations BDM [0.971333]
Hello TMG User Group I address this message to TMG users Citing or trying to construct Source templates from Irish repositories that do not fit easily into any of the Mills or Lackey type templates. THE COMPLEXITY OF POOR LAW UNIONS,PARISHES, WITHIN BARONIES, TOWNLANDS, ELECTORAL DIVISIONS etc, does not fit too well into any particular type of template. So it would seem some CUSTOM TEMPLATES are needed for the type of sources as listed. From my experience of substituting & juggling around source eleme
23. Re: TMG-L: informal sources [0.971333]
Virginia Basken wrote: >About five years ago, at a family reunion, I handed out questionairre forms >to several family members, so that they could "fill in the blanks" so to >speak in my data on them. This was for their personal data only. I have >these forms which were returned to me, with such data as birth, baptism, and >marriage dates filled in and signed. I consider that if a person filled >their own dates, especially birth and marriage, that this is a pretty sound >source. Not a public record, but
24. Re: TMG-L: sources and citation details [0.971333]
Ken Wood wrote: >I need help with sources, citations, and repositories. > >I have entered a repository, a source and a citation for the birth of a >family member. The preview of the full footnote reads as follows: > >Carol Marjorie Martin, birth certificate 31-09-681227,<[CD]> (18 Dec 1931), >British Columbia Archives, 655 Belleville Street, Victoria, British >Columbia, Canada V8W 9V1. > >I understand that the [CD] refers to a citation detail. There is none for >this entry. Why does the [CD] appear in both
25. Re: TMG-L: Census templates [0.971333]
In a message dated 3/26/00 6:52:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, lhoffman@acm.org writes: << I don't know that there is a way to tie the three families together except through the location fields of the various tags. That is, entering the street address in the Detail field of the tags. >> In the census tag memo I make a note of the other family heads in the household. I do this on each of the families' census tag memos. This helps me connect the families without interfering with the members in t
Viewing 1-25 of 1,005 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.489926