Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:mar +date:2001)
Viewing 1-25 of 3,156 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: [TMG] Sentences -- Married Name [1]
On Thu, 08 March 2001, Allen Mellen wrote: > > Marcia Philbrick wrote: > > > > Is it possible to force a sentence to use a married name for a woman > > > after her marriage? > > > > > > For example, I have a land record in which Mary Minnick(a widow) sells > > > land to her son. Below is my current sentence structure (land-sold) > > > > > > [P] sold land <[M]> <[L]> <[D]> > > > > > > I have entered the son as a witness with the sentence structure > > > > > > [W] purchased [M] from [P]
2. Re: [TMG] Witnesses [1]
On Wed, 21 March 2001, Dean Scribner wrote: > > TMG's Witness feature is almost the most useful one since. . . But > people talk only of "witnesses" and "witnessing". This feature is useful > to reflect ANY way in which an indivual is associated with, interested > in, or influenced by any "event". All that is necessary is to modify, or > in most cases, replace the default sentence. If we stop thinking of > "witness" as meaning exclusively "witness" it has infinite > possibilities. If only we coul
3. Re: [TMG] Blood/Family Relationships- terminology,narratives and charts [0.971544]
Andy - You seem to have covered most of the bases but you have omitted ones for children who are the product of birth mothers. These children are not biological (at least I don't think they are by your definitions but could be considered *natural*), nor are they step, adoptive or foster. What is the child's relationship to the birth mother? ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 10:31 PM Subject: [TMG] Blood/Family Relationships- termin
4. Re: [TMG] OT [Deadly Dust!] [0.971544]
While this is no doubt good advice, this story is not true: http://www.snopes2.com/toxins/raturine.htm The Center for Disease Control says, in part: "The e-mail report is untrue. CDC could not substantiate this report of a hantavirus infection, nor has CDC been asked to participate in an investigation of the incident described in the e-mail." http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hoaxes/hanta-hoax.htm Carol Simpson Homer, AK ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Brogger To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Friday, Ma
5. [TMG] Fwd: Re: Relationship Tags - was Sort dates vs drag-n-drop [0.971544]
Jan Roberts said: >Yet the Dau-Step / Son-Step etc. tags *are* relationship tags even though >they do not describe a blood relationship. Yes, just as Dau-Ado is, as has been pointed out. There too, the tag type allows you to treat the step parent as though they are the biological parent, if you are inclined to do so. >They do have to be used if you want to create a relationship link between >the parent and child concerned - No they don't. They have to be used if you want to create a _blood_ relati
6. Re: [TMG] Printing image with a report [0.971544]
Thank you Edwin. Are there any other insights available. Pat
7. Re: [TMG]Blood/Family Relationships [0.971544]
In a message dated 3/16/01 3:00:28 PM Central Standard Time, bvelke@whollygenes.com writes: > difference between relationship tags and event tags and the purposes for > each. I have agreed repeatedly and I asked for suggestions about how to > improve it but didn't get any. I think the problem is that some of us (myself included) DO want the children to be included in narrative reports, we just want the report to specify that these children are not blood related. But since we only have BLOOD rel
8. RE: [TMG] Wishlist -- Doc # for CD (NOT source) [0.971544]
DeAnna, I think I'm using the Task List to accomplish pretty much what you want. Each time I use a source, I enter a task, attached to that SOURCE, and include my "document number" (in the Memo field). I put the date of the research on the Completed line, along with the repository where I got the record (archives, library, home library, Internet) and the call number. In the Keywords field I put the surname (you might want to be even more specific and put person numbers or given names). Then I can genera
9. Re: [TMG] Recording ancestry with missing generations [0.971544]
Jim Blease wrote: > > BHarris wrote: > > > > Just remember that averages can be VERY misleading. There were 81 years > > between my gf's birthdate and my sister's. She was the younger of two > > children. If my mother had followed my gm's lead and had children over a 25 > > year period, there would have been 96 years between the birth of my gf and > > his last gchild. > > Barbara > > My grandmother was born in 1864; one of her cousins in 1903. Grandma > was the first child of her mother's generation,
10. Re: [TMG]Blood/Family Relationships, was Add me to wish listers re: parents... [0.971544]
At 08:40 PM 3/16/01 -0500, CheasaG@cs.com wrote: >In a message dated 3/16/01 7:36:45 PM Central Standard Time, AGH3RD@aol.com >writes: > > > > << So, when you find that great aunt Betty was adopted, will you delete > all > > her descendants from your database, even if you have been trading > > "genealogical" data for years? > > > > 1). I rarely trade data > > 2). I'd de-link her so that no descendants showed as blood > relationships in > > any chart. > > 3). I would not the adoption > > > > > >So you real
11. Re: [TMG] Global Changes to Primary Tags? [0.971544]
Rick Hannon wrote: > Is there a way to globally remove all Primary tags and then go back and > globally set specific tags as primary in all records of a dataset? I don't believe so. Why would you want to do that? Terry Reigel
12. Re: [TMG]Blood/Family Relationships [0.971544]
From: "Cheri Casper" Or is there > some other "different kind of tag" that I am missing. I think he is referring to event tags e.g. the adoption tag. Gary ---------- Gary Hester/Alabama E-Mail: ghester@hiwaay.net My Website: http://home.hiwaay.net/~ghester/index.html Researching Surnames: ALLEN, BAKER, BARLOW, BLASINGEM, BOLTON, CHAMBLEE, DENTON, DOLBEAR, FREE, GRAHAM, HESTER, HUGHES, JONES, MALONE, MCNATT, MCRAE, MILLER, MEISENHEIMER, MOORE, POUNDERS, RICHARDSON, SMITH, SPARKS, TERRY, TURNER, WILLIS, W
13. Re: [TMG] TMG version & sharing datasets [0.971544]
I believe you could use John Cardinal's program called Mocakebi which will let this person view your TMG data. S/he will not, however, be able to make any edits, only view. ----- Original Message ----- From: Linda Lawhon To: Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 9:54 AM Subject: [TMG] TMG version & sharing datasets > Hi, > > I have not done this before so I need some input. I have TMG v 4.0d > Gold. Is there anyway I can create a dataset to share with someone > who
14. Re: [TMG] The intrusive FTM [0.971544]
At 07:18 PM 3-5-2001 -0500, George King wrote: >The problem is with FTM and is unnerving but not as serious as it appears. >FTM has told Windows to "associate" the GED file extension with FTM. >Therefore, Windows shows the file name with an FTM icon. ... If you have >any doubt, open your file in WordPad. You will see that indeed it is a GEDCOM. >This is one of the reasons that we TMG users love to hate FTM. Well, sort of... It's not that FTM associates .ged with itself. The *big* problem is th
15. Re: [TMG] UNSUBSCRIBE [0.971544]
If OE is pulling messages from the separate accounts, it should be able to send from those accounts. Click on the 'from' drop down box and select the account you need to send from. If that fails, why not write to the support of the old email address and ask them to stop forwarding. Bonita ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lindsay Graham" To: Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 8:45 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] UNSUBSCRIBE > Thank you for the various suggestions, bot
16. RE: OT Proof (was RE: [TMG] Off Topic: Blood Relationships) [0.971544]
At 08:07 PM 3/5/01 -0500, John Cardinal wrote: [snip] >What's the plural of mongoose? Do they write well? Mongooses. No. Darrell Darrell A. Martin a native Vermonter currently in exile in Addison, Illinois darrellm@sprynet.com
17. RE: [TMG] Relationship events [0.971544]
Richard Brogger wrote, in part: < mentioned showing adoptive parents in a pedigree chart and I had never considered that anyone would do that. Since it appears that some do, I would think that "the purists in our midst" would want a change in TMG so that a Pedigree chart showing adoptive parents would make it clear that is being done. >> When people here talk about an ancestor or pedigree chart, and a descendant chart, that include adoptive or similar relationships, I
18. Re: [TMG] Why Relationship Tags At All? [0.971544]
>Perhaps so, but the program isn't dealing with facts. It is *not* >impossible to have _evidence_ of a blood relationship without _evidence_ of >the birth event or vica versa.... I don't understand how this could be so. If I know someone was the biological child of another person, then I have evidence of a birth event. It is no different from knowing that two people were married, but not knowing the date or location. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE dow
19. [TMG] printing memo field [0.971544]
I can't seem to get the memo field to print. For example, when I add the physical address in the memo field and then print a chart, I get the city, county, state and country, but nothing from the memo field. This happens in all my charts. Thanks John ---------- John Steiger email: jsteiger@houston.rr.com Surnames: Steiger, Saxton, Dusch, Johnson, Lee, McDonald Brailly, Dempsey, Elmore, Hansen, Holmes Web sites: http://www.egroups.com/group/ClearfieldPA (Clearfield Co., PA) Generations Not Forgotten ht
20. Re: [TMG] TMG Viewer (Family Tree SuperTools) [0.971544]
BUT ... we want it now!!! (LOL ... :o)) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Velke" To: Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] TMG Viewer (Family Tree SuperTools) > Mike Fox said: > > >Anyone hear when the TMG Viewer (FamilyTreeSuperTools) is going to hit the > >street? > > Congratulations, Mike, for being the first to ask . > > Cheri Casper said: > > >When I ordered my copy some time ago, I was told March 1. > > I beg to differ wit
21. Re: [TMG] Proof Tags explanation is long [0.971544]
In a message dated 3/3/01 2:53:04 PM Central Standard Time, mphilbrick@galaxyispc.com writes: > I haven't been able to locate a proof tag in my list of tags. I am > using > TMG version 4.0 gold. I cannot find anywhere in the options menu where > I > can select/deselect tags. Am I overlooking something? OR, do I need to > create a new tag for this function? If so, can someone suggest how the > sentence structure should be set up? > What is a PROOF tag? If you are looking for a place to put your proof fo
22. Re: [TMG] Indexing question [0.971544]
Yesterday Christopher asked: >I'm creating a Descendants Journal Narrative in HTML. I've had amazing >fun with sentence structures and embedded printer codes, and I've pretty >much got the web pages appears just as I want them. > >But, the index is driving me mad. I'm getting a link to every instance of >a name in the pages. How can I reduce this to one link per person, say to >the main part of the narrative for that person? This question has been asked repeatedly over the years. I'm not aware of a
23. [TMG] Roots, marriages, step-parents, etc [0.971544]
"not as applied in modern times"...Modern times includes a lot more do-it-your-own-way than, say, those centuries where marriages were arranged, dowered, bought and sold. My own ancestors came here simply because they fell in love and couldn't marry in the class structure they'd been born in [buster]. But we now have a situation in which the actual parents might not even know [much less share] each others' names. That's why I [thoughtlessly] said I'll accept a "marriage" as whatever produces a child. Whosoe
24. [TMG] 100 Photos - now what? [0.971544]
Bobbie stated... After a recent visit with my in-laws in Scotland, I have temporary custody of well over a hundred photos of my husband's ancestors. I did manage to get them all identified, and that in itself was a task! (Every photo drew another story! :) Right, so now I have these old black and white photos, and plan to scan all of them (and have a handful of the best copied by a photo shop) before they're returned to their owners this summer. I'd like some suggestions on how best to handle the im
25. RE: [TMG] Re: Normalizing or Standardizing Surnames [0.971544]
Madlyn C. Jamison wrote: > It seems to me the advocates of standardization of surnames do not fully > understand the importance of including variant spellings of a surname. [SNIP] Madlyn, I won't speak for the other advocates, but my reason for adding standard surname tags, and my methods, are not in opposition with your post. I add a standard surname solely as a research aid. For example, I have people in my ancestry whose surname was variously spelled "Millet", "Myllit", "Millett", etc. I capture all t
Viewing 1-25 of 3,156 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.509922