Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:nov +date:2000)
Viewing 1-25 of 1,808 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [TMG] Roles Use [1]
I just downloaded the 4.0c upgrade. It has the provision for roles which I think is something that UFT had (?). Anyway, my question is how are persons using the roles? To further clarify, why would I wish to use roles in place of or in addition to witnesses? I would appreciate learning from former UFT users who used roles and TMG users who did not have them until recently and are now using them. Thanks for your responses Wayne Dreier User of The Master Genealogist Northwest Ohio Researcher _____________
2. [TMG] Sentence Construction for Roles [1]
I have been expermenting with using roles. Here is what I've done and the results I have gotten: I added a new tag called Cen-Son and added a role called 1910 Census Son and constructed the following sentence: [P1] is listed as a son of the head of household, [FATH] <[D]> census. I saved the tag at this point with the role highlighted and the sentence showing thinking that that is how I needed to select that role to use it. The tag is used in the son's record only.The result when I print the Individual
3. [TMG] Foxprow error messages [1]
I recently upgraded from 4.0 to 4.0c and began to get Foxprow error messages under the following circumstances: I would print to screen an individual narrative report (accessing the report from the menu or from the CRW toolbar icon made no difference in the outcome). The report would print fine and I closed the window and would get the box showing the number of endnotes and bibliography. I would close that and almost without exception would get an error message window that said something to the effect that
4. Re: [TMG] Sentence Construction for Roles [1]
On Sun, 19 November 2000, Lee Hoffman/KY wrote: > Have you selected the Role for that person in the Principal#1 and > Principal#2 or as Witnesses? Each Role must have the Sentence set up for > that Role. Is the father entered as a Witness (with Fath as the Role)? Here is what I did: I created a new tag and named it Cen-Son in a prior version of TMG (read BR, before roles). When I upgraded to version 4.0c that tag now has two roles - Principal and Witness. Each of them have a default sentence. I have
5. Re: [TMG] Sentence Construction for Roles [1]
On Mon, 20 November 2000, "Wendell H. Wilcox" wrote: > > Wait 1. > > Page 267 of the 4.0 manual defines [FATH] as the "Primary name of the father of the > Current Principal." So the sentence is correct and should work if Principal 1 is > specified and they have a Primary Father defined. There is no need to define a Role > of "FATH". I have used [FATH] in some of my sentences and it works fine so the > problem has to be something else. > > Wendell Thanks Wendell, that is exactly where I found it. I have
6. Re: [TMG] Flag Box and TMG 5.0 [1]
On Fri, 24 November 2000, Lee Hoffman/KY wrote: > Not at this time. I believe that Bob indicated in the Demo at Providence > and/or at Salt Lake City that TMG v5.0 will allow re-ordering of the Flags. > > As someone is sure to ask, TMG v5.0 will not be released until probably > after the end of the year. But I am sure that Bob will get it out earlier > if possible (but I'm don't recommend holding your breath ). > Lee, can you comment on Wholly Genes policy to support previous versions when a new
7. Re: [TMG] Name-Marr Tag [0.970231]
County and parish are in the same level because of our governmental structure. Parish is not a religious unit. In all of the states except Louisiana, the USUAL order of governmental bodies (going from smallest to largest) is city/town, county or parish, state. Louisiana uses the term "parish" but it is essentially interchangeable with "county." ----- Original Message ----- From: Jonas Kuschner To: Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 4:42 AM Subject: Re: [TMG
8. [TMG] Siblings not connecting [0.970231]
Can anyone help me? I am VERY new to this program, have used FTM in the past.. and here is my problem: I have entered a name, then i added a mother, added a father, then from that mother or father i enter the first persons siblings. When I look at the tree view of the first person, it shows him as the only child of the parents, and doesnt show the siblings. If I show one parent, the first person shows up as a child..and on another parent it shows the siblings I DONT GET THIS! do i have to go and RE DO
9. Re: [TMG] Serial Number [0.970231]
Karen, Several of us who are using EarthLink are trying to find out how to remove that Reply To line from our e-mail. Nothing on the Configure screen helps and nobody at EarthLink help has offered a solution. If you get it figured out, I hope you will share the answer with the list. Joan > [Original Message] > From: William Roberts > To: > Date: 11/13/00 1:24:38 AM > Subject: Re: [TMG] Serial Number > > Karen > > You need to remove the "Reply To" inform
10. Re: [TMG] Embedded printer codes - Newbie question [0.970231]
At 10:51 PM 11/8/2000, Marianne wrote: >When I print a descendant report to the screen it looks perfect, however when >I print it to a file and open it through word it has all of the (i assume >printer) codes in the document. Can't seem to figure out how to get rid of >these codes - I'm sure it's very simple...... Marianne You are probably seeing the indexing codes that TMG inserts so that Word can generate an index for you. If you click on the 'paragraph' button (Looks like a reverse 'P'), Word will
11. Re: [TMG] Identifying Cleaned up Source [0.970231]
Well, my original sources had no surety values attached. I attach them as I clean up. They show on the list, so it's helpful. Dick >At 09:16 AM 11/1/2000, DonnyPerry@aol.com said: >Hi, > >I have been going through and cleaning up some of my sources. Is there some >way that I am able to tag these sources to note that they are now correct? > >"Donny" Donald Lee Perry >1667 Sylvan Ave. >Dallas, TX 75208-2544 >214.941.5454 >DonnyPerry@aol.com Personal genealogy at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages
12. Re: [TMG] finding people connected with a place [0.970231]
Not only will a LOP report with 'Any tag place contains XXX' find all occurrences of a place, but if you include an OR with the second line as Any tag Memo contains XXX, it will find references to a place that you have put into a memo. For instance, if you had a reference to a 'Fairlawn Cemetery' in a memo and not in the place field, you would that as well. Bill J.
13. Re: [TMG] TMG Master Place List-Record Numbers [0.970231]
LARMARGAL@aol.com wrote: >Thanks Dick and Bob for your responses but I guess I wasn't clear. I have >items on my MPL which are wrong, e.g. "Roman Catholic" in the county field >probably from my FTM transfer to TMG. I have no idea where the record is and >would like to know before I edit it. When I first go to MPL Realign/Edit, >the bottom counts down the records then shifts to "Realign places names with >Ctrl-Arrows" rather then noting the record where the cursor is located. The >Help under Realig
14. Re: [TMG] Checking tags for documentation [0.970231]
I agree with this too it would be nice to see it on the Person View AND in the MERGE routine. I sure don't want to delete off the tags that have source information. For the MERGE, I would also like it to display the spouse name for marriages. And to avoid my problem of killing the 'marriage' between parents, warn that when merging you need to ensure to keep the parents (if different IDs) from the same Person ID number (color) ... It is a mess when you have to go back and try to put the marriages back tog
15. Re: [TMG] Vs: Reply to problems [0.970231]
TMG LIST: Why is this list so full of ISP discussion and mail servers? I thought it was for TMG discussion. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jos Okhuijsen" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:10 PM Subject: Vs: [TMG] Vs: Reply to problems > Hi Patricia, > > At least Netscape 6 (free downloadable softwware) > does have wordwrap, and it's on by default. Looks > nice too! (keeping the lines short :-) And He, your >
16. [TMG] List Of Tasks report [0.970231]
Hi all I have an question regarding the List of Task reports. I'd like to be able to produce the report to a comma delimited file (for import into Excel). I've looked at the output options on the report and haven't found a way of doing this. Also, I'd like to be able to import such a file back into TMG. (I'm thinking about working on the file on a Palm device). How easy would it be for me to write such a utility (given that I have a programming background)? Regards Alison Alison Ruxton Logica Comp
17. Re: [TMG] TMG Program Frozen [0.970231]
Grace said: >I did do the Control-Alt-delete -- didn't see the preview screen, so I just >closed the program. I will just have to live with the result. If I can >just find exactly where I started this morning and redo it. I kept getting your answering machine but I guess I'll stop calling now . I'd be surprised if you lost any data at all but I'm sure that it would be no more than the one record on which you worked most recently. >Now, I have created a new problem. Somehow my Email screen has gon
18. [TMG] new computer and 4.0a [0.970231]
I am getting a new computer. My data is in 4.0a. Can I use 4.0 for my 4.0a data? I used to read the TMG digests faithfully--often 2-3 weeks late. Although I have all of the digests on floppy disks & may evenutally read them, I don't have the time to read such a volume of Digests that we now get. I've barely skimmed some lately & am concerned by the data problems some people have reported with 4.0a. I gather there may be another patch (? 4.0c). What are the changes from 4.0a to 4.0c?
19. Re: [TMG] Re: Published work not correct - how to handle [0.970231]
I would make the book the source for all the corrct information that you got _only_ from the book. Make your M-I-L or her sources the sources for the information that he and you got from your M-I-L. This really is not a TMG problem but a genealogy problem bob gillis R. Theaker wrote: > > > A distant family member has published a book. In doing so, he contacted > my > > mother-in-law for information but when he compiled the information, a few > > mistakes were made. Although I'd like to recognize the
20. Re: [TMG] Name-Marr Tag [0.970231]
> > In recording such information (same sex marriages, etc.) it appears that > we are leaving genealogy and getting into recording relationships such > as "who's sleeping with who?" If so, a change in the name of the > program from THE MASTER GENEALOGIST to something like THE MASTER > INQUIRER would be in order. > > Lewis > Hi Lewis, I can't really see the difference between recording same sex relationships or heterosexual 'non/married' relationships or actually any kind of relationships. Whether or no
21. RE: [TMG] Image Caption or Exhibit Description [0.970231]
I get the exactly the same results, and I too use Windows ME. Ed Godfrey Seattle, WA -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Hanthorn [mailto:hanthorn@alpha.wcoil.com] Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 11:09 AM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] Image Caption or Exhibit Description I am not able to get the caption or exhibit description to print in a Reverse Register report. I am using the following in the Exhibit's Description field. Caption: The photograph of Milton Hanthorn was taken about 1865;
22. Re: [TMG] Can't get rid of unused places [0.970231]
Bob, Thank you for your reply. I now know what to do. But for the record, I haven't recorded short place name, place comment, or start/end years for any of these -- the only thing I can think of is that somewhere in the conversion from RIII to UFT (and maybe even to TMG?) something that looks to TMG like one of those got inserted into the file. Joan > [Original Message] > From: Bob Velke > To: > Date: 11/5/00 3:30:07 PM > Subject: Re: [TMG] Can't get rid of
23. [TMG] TMGW Labels? [0.970231]
I have so many files that I keep my genealogy information in. When I used BK I could format labels and output all the critical information. Any changes around the corner to add labels? **************************************** Bonita of Dallas / Ft. Worth, Texas, USA Genealogy is my Passion LadyBonita@home.com ****************************************
24. Re: [TMG] VCF as JPG or GIF [0.970231]
Gary Ruppert wrote: > I'm having problems saving a VCF as either a JPG or GIF file. After > creating the chart, I choose Save As and then choose All Files under > file type (there are only two choices: VCF or All Files). I add either > a .JPG or .GIF suffix and save. Unfortunately, when I try to open the > file with several different graphics programs I get the same message, > "unknown file type." Checking properties of the files, everything > seems to be in order. > > I know that VCF charts can be saved a
25. [TMG] Method of clean up of Master Place List [0.970231]
My master place list seems very irregular. There are a few totally blank records with no entries across the board, quite a few records with only DETAIL entries and SHORT PLACE entries; a few DETAIL without SHORT PLACE entries, DEFAULT LABELS are mostly NO but there are a few marked YES that have no SHORT PLACE entries. All of this irregularity scares you but the bottom line, the reports and endnotes, seem to be OK. I attribute most of this irregularity to the multiple transfers from Roots 3, Roots 4, etc
Viewing 1-25 of 1,808 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.489926