Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:nov +date:2001)
Viewing 1-25 of 994 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [TMG] FTST [1]
I am currently using TMG 4.0d and don't seem to have the problems that some of you have with crashing, etc. I am running it on an iMac using Virtual PC and Windows 98 SE. My question really concerns the newly released FTST. I have looked at all the info on Wholly Genes website and like many of the features I see offered. What I don't understand is the emphasis on features that I think I already have, such as Relationship calculator, date calculator and the like. What was not clear is what changes were made
2. RE: [TMG] New timelines [0.871892]
Peter Your'e right. I get the same display as you. I will try and come up with a solution in a bit. David David Carnley -- Newton, Texas E-mail: mailto:david@carnley.net My website: http://www.carnley.net :-----Original Message----- :From: Peter Goldfield [mailto:photographers@duckspool.com] :Sent: Nov 12, 2001 4:22 PM :To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com :Subject: RE: [TMG] New timelines : : :Hmm David, that's what I thought, same as other Timelines I've looked at. :But still doesn't display properly? : :Do I
3. Re: [TMG] VIRUS WARNING! [0.871892]
In a message dated 11/27/01 9:55:46 AM Central Standard Time, tomnagy@nauticom.net writes: > > You can not vet a virus from any rootsweb.com mailing list > because rootsweb.com will not forward any message with an > attachmenet. > > No, but they do use the mailing list to get the email addresses, because I got the virus today on another address that I have used in the past for TMG L and the email came through as Re: [TMG] Subject. I am assuming that someone had an email from my old address, sin
4. RE: [TMG] OT:best image editing software for genealogy? [0.871892]
I'm using Version 5. The latest version 6 and 7 have added a lot of new features but for me I'm ok with the features of Version 5. You can download a trail version from their web site, 30 days. It is fully functional nothing is disabled. David David Carnley -- Newton, Texas E-mail: mailto:david@carnley.net My website: http://www.carnley.net :-----Original Message----- :From: REPAGE@aol.com [mailto:REPAGE@aol.com] :Sent: Nov 03, 2001 5:06 PM :To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com :Subject: Re: [TMG] OT:best image e
5. [TMG] Research Log & Sources [0.871892]
Thank you to all who offered suggestions regarding the Research Log. One person mentioned the current strengths of sources in FTM. I went back to it after having played with TMG. I was quickly reminded why I purchased TMG . . . FTM lacks the documentation features I am looking for. Speaking of which . . . I am starting with an entry for me. I am trying to find suitable templates for old school programs, diplomas, etc. I have not been able to figure which to use. Any suggestions? Also, when I use a
6. [TMG] Bad Trans has silver lining? [0.871892]
I am running Windows 98 SE. Thanks to this List, I scurried off to avail myself of the security patch and critical product downloads (in that order) from the Microsoft site, applying everything on Monday night - in time to repel a would-be attack on Tuesday morning. Tonight, I launched TMG _after_ Outlook Express, an event which has usually been guaranteed to bring my system to a shuddering stop. It didn't. I have also exited TMG with OE running, dialled up and relaunched TMG while on-line, again with n
7. Re: [TMG] gedcom import [0.871892]
I did as you suggested and chose deactive LDS tags, but they are still there. Now what? Jane S. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Hoffman" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] gedcom import > Jane Sarles wrote: > >I was able to successfully import a gedcom into a data base that I > >constructed for the purpose. Many tags were imported that I do not want - > >stake and seal information, things called unknown gedcom, etc. > > >
8. Re: [TMG] GEDCOM Export Concern(was How to Filter for Witnesses?) [0.871892]
Sorry, can't let it rest. Here are a couple more thoughts on this. 1) If Genbridge were a two-way street how would you deal with this same issue? i.e. a census event in TMG with 8 people attached to it could not exported that way to Legacy. In Legacy it would have to be 8 census events, one for each person enumerated. The issue is not so much one of GEDCOM, but one of event-based software vs lineage linked software. 2) I am by no means an expert in GEDCOM, but I'm somewhat familiar with it and h
9. Re: [TMG] Import from R3 or UFT [0.871892]
Pam, I have the same issue with a few datasets, and decided a while back that I would get more of my data across to TMG if I went from R3 to UFT and then Genbridged to TMG. Someplace I saw a table that lists all the elements that are converted from each program, but I can no longer find it (what I remember seeing is not in the TMG Reference Manual). But it showed a lot more coming over from UFT than from R3. I haven't actually tested this by bringing one of my old R3 datasets directly to TMG. But I
10. RE: [TMG] Wedlock [0.871892]
> From: Bob Velke [mailto:bvelke@whollygenes.com] > > Yes, but you aren't just recording modern births, are you? If the source > describes the birth as illegitimate, then that's the way that _I_ prefer to > record it. I'll leave it to other people to decide whether it is > appropriate to apply a value judgement to the term . Yes Bob point taken, I realised afterwards - and almost sent a subsidiary message - in the past someone's illegitimacy may have been a central issue to their whole lives. Happ
11. [TMG] "unknown repository address" in endnotes, but not in preview [0.871892]
I sometimes get "unknown repository address" in the endnotes, whether or not Unique is checked, but not in the Full footnote preview - does anyone know why (see example below)? The repository *is* marked as primary. regards, beth Full footnote template: [RECORD TYPE], [REPOSITORY], [REPOSITORY ADDRESS]; [READER]<, [DATE]><, [CD]>. Full footnote Preview: Office files, Elmwood Cemetery, 1101 Hyatt Street, Sherbrooke, Quibec, Canada; transcribed by the author, Oct 1999<, [CD]>. Endnote, Descendancy char
12. Re: [TMG] Mystery Spouse [0.871892]
Garth MacGirr wrote: > Thanks to Terry, my mystery spouse has disappeared. I had entered a tag > showing where the husband (and not the wife) lived on a certain date. > TMG must have assumed that he lived there with another (undefined) > spouse. Garth, what kind of tag did you use for showing where the husband lived? To behave as you described, that tag would have to be in the Marriage or Divorce groups, as strange place for a tag about where someone lived. Terry
13. RE: [TMG] web page [0.871892]
Hi Judy, I'm not sure about duplicating the charts, but I use the utility 'DFTCOM2'. It produces a dynamic family tree. You can check out mine at http://www.fewston.com/genealogy/dftcom2/mytree.html Bill -----Original Message----- From: Judy Bramlage [mailto:jbramlage@acm.org] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:41 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [TMG] web page I 'inherited' http://www.wmn.net/rowleytw when a friend died. I like his organization and much of the data, but I certainly haven't
14. Re: [TMG] New (Bewildered) Subscriber [0.871892]
Karen, I personally believe this program is going to be around a long time. The reason I suppose he doesn't upgrade is because TMG is hugely efficient and effective just the way it is. At least from my point of view. I consider it a plus that this is not a big company...no charges for technical support, no upgrades that cost me $$$$ every few months. In fact, I consider that a major problem with FTM....upgrades every time you turn around. In my mind,, this "mom and son" ( as opposed to a "mom and po
15. Re: [TMG] name search [0.871892]
Myrnice No I hadn't thought of doing that since I didn't know where in his name the "Hervey" belonged. I just tried it though, and it worked. So much work to find one guy! Victoria At 06:10 AM 11/2/2001 -0500, you wrote: >Victoria > >Did you put the "*" in front and back of the name? > >Myrnice > > "Victoria" wrote: > > > Myrnice > > > > I tried the instructions you gave (and a couple of variations)...but it > > came back with "no matches found" every time. Perhaps it was because his > > first name i
16. [TMG] Common Law Marriage [0.871892]
In some of the obituaries I have read that they are "survived by their friend..(name)." Danny Clarksburg WV ---------------------- http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~jenkinsconnections/ ICQ #7232435
17. RE: [TMG] Wedlock [0.871892]
--=======56AF4F0======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-5A737DA; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The option I use is to change the marriage tag sentence to read "had a child with" instead of "married", in the event the recorder knows nothing of the circumstances of the parents. Just a thought. Elizabeth Tilton ============================================================== >Thankfully, we can each do it as we prefer - and that's why a question that >starts with "What is
18. [TMG] How to download doc (was RE: Date in person view) [0.871892]
At 11:42 AM 11-1-2001 +0000, Susan Nicholson wrote: >I tried to download this myself after reading the message below, being an >absolute dummy I seem to have done something wrong - it hasn't worked. >Could you explain more ? ie step by step re what to do and where to put it >etc. Go to: http://www.whollygenes.com/html/files.htm (Wholly Genes website http://www.whollygenes.com/ and click on the "Files" button in the nav bar area on the left) (Note to Bob - what's with the font in the headlines on the f
19. Re: [TMG] Timelines [0.871892]
Tony Field wrote: >Perhaps I missed it on the TMG tips site, but I am looking for guidance on >creating a timeline. I don't have a problem on how to create one but on the >contents that should be included. > >I am busy generating one for Gloucester (UK) since I have a few ancestors >from there and have some rough items into the timeline. However I will when >finished I will put on the web for anyone else to use. Therefore I would >like to follow some accepted guidelines of which there must be some. > >Items
20. Re[2]: [TMG] Again -- When Version 5 [0.871892]
Friday, November 30, 2001, 9:25:16 PM, you wrote: LH> Arlene wrote: >>Not only that - it won't accept a file name that has an apostrophe i.e. >>"Stan's house" LH> The problem is not the apostrophe or the space, but the fact that the name LH> is longer than eight characters. The old 8.3 naming scheme won't allow spaces in filenames. I don't remember if apostrophes were allowed.
21. Re: [TMG] The Click Of Death [0.871892]
Thanks for the button tip - that does work. I have Windows ME but received a coupon for a free upgrade to XP. I wasn't sure I should upgrade, because I remember the hassle of going from 95 to 98, but I guess I will consider it. I will also trying opening TMG first since that seems to work for others. Thanks, Ruth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Phalen" To: Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 8:49 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] The Click Of Death > I have a D
22. [TMG] New timelines [0.871892]
With your guidance from "Artist timelines" and "Editing timelines" post I've created some new databases via Excel and Access which I'll let you have when they've been refined a bit. One irksome problem - in Access I create memo fields for the "Event" and number fields for "Day", "Month" and "Year". No matter whether I put zeros or nothing in empty day or month fields they always show up as 0._0. rather than _ __ which is rather ugly - can anyone help? Peter www.duckspool.com
23. Re: [TMG] Family Tree Super Tools CD [0.871892]
> Not yet, but just ordered on Nov. 6th > when did you order? Shortly after it was first released...probably about a week afterwards, and definitely not more than two. I don't recall the actual date, and my confirmation email is on my desktop computer whose monitor went belly-up a couple of days ago. I am using my laptop for email, etc., but I don't have my saved e-mail messages on it. Thanks for your response! Diane
24. [TMG] my order lost? [0.871892]
I called the toll free 877 number and ordered FTST d/l only and was told I would be sent d/l code in a day or so...I have not received code yet. JoAnn Irwin
25. Re: [TMG] web page [0.871892]
Renie Brunet wrote: >For those of you who have a web page, I would like very much to visit your >site to give me an idea of one can do, so could you give me your address. My genealogy links page can be viewed at http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~jeangene/ where small pictures at the top link to two family pages, but go to http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~jeangene/Lyle/ to see the unfinished family site I am currently working on which features a descendant report created in TMG and then modi
Viewing 1-25 of 994 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.549917