Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:nov +date:2003)
Viewing 1-25 of 1,639 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: [TMG] OT: Body Donated to Institution [1]
Do you have a copy of the document she signed? Dollars to doughnuts it did say that no remains would be returned. Usually a very large incinerator is used to burn the cadavers. It isn't like at a funeral home where individual ashes are kept. On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 18:04, Joe Makowiec wrote: > At 04:45 PM 11-16-2003 -0800, Pauline Ballentine wrote: > >It's interesting that recently my sister-in-law died and her body was > >donated to a medical college. My brother-in-law had expected to get her > >ashe
2. Re: [TMG] TMG v5.10 has been released [1]
Looks like you have been busy adding some extras. They will be very useful. On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 22:39, Bob Velke wrote: > > Note about HTML > o TMG5 does not yet include HTML (web page) output. For > those who are not already using John Cardinal's excellent > Second Site (http://www.whollygenes.com/secondsite.htm) > to produce web pages, the next release and CD will include > basic HTML output for lists and narrative reports > (including linked endnotes, image
3. Re: [TMG] PDA comparision [1]
If you go with factory reconditioned (they were DOA out of the box and were returned, fixed, and sold with 90 day warranties), you can get a color Sony Palm OS with 16MB for $149 (Fry's), and a Toshiba Pocket PC e740 with 64MB and WiFi from eCost.com for $189. As far as monochrome, that's a thing of the past. The Visor Prism I bought 3 years ago has a color screen. Not as nice as the Toshiba Pocket PC I have, but it is still color. The new color Palms are as good as the Pocket PC screens. As far as pro
4. Re: [TMG] Windows 95 and Windows 98 users [1]
Microsoft strikes again. On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 20:32, Bob Velke wrote: > As promised, I have added an entry in the FAQ list about a problem that can > prevent TMG v5.10 from running on a machine with Windows 95 or Windows 98 > First Edition. The simple solution is to install an utility that was > omitted from those older operating systems. > > The problem does not apply to machines running Windows 98 Second Edition or > any subsequent operating system (ME, 2000, NT, XP). > > To access the FAQ list,
5. [TMG] Add new daughter, son or child [0.871795]
I am using version 5.09 I have the father on the screen as the named person. He has a marriage tag with his wife's name and ID no. Now I highlight the name tag and go to add daughter. As soon as I click on Add, the highlight of the name disappears. Select second parent screen appears. But the wife is not on there. So I click on identify another person and put her ID no in there. I click OK and suddenly the Help Topics screen appears. I click cancel and the screen then freezes and I click ESC to get o
6. RE: [TMG] What Book Manager reports would you suggest [0.871795]
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 Frank van Thienen wrote: >I don't see anybody jumping on this one. Nobody thinking about >publishing? >I am quite happy with the books I printed earlier this year, they >started with showing pedigree box charts (VCF), then the ancestors >journal narrative including siblings, followed by one or more descendant >journal narratives, depending on how many interesting lines there are. >So basically two journal narratives. >The box charts had to be split, because I wanted to show them on t
7. Re: [TMG] TMG - setting relationships [0.871795]
Kathie wrote: >Some time ago (in TMG V4.x) I found instructions on how to set flags to show >people I was related to. Direct ancestors would come up in one color, >cousins >in another, etc. > >I cannot remember where I found the instructions. Would anyone know where I >can find the instructions. Want to do the same thing in TMG V5.10. Perhaps you saw the description of setting the flags on my TMG web page, listed below. There is also a description of the process at Lee Hoffman's www.tmgtips.com Al
8. Re: [TMG] Children adopted at a re-marriage [0.871795]
Sue Wyatt wrote: >After my family reunion, I am now getting the database updated, so putting >in adopted and fostered children. Presume it is done with flags but who do >you have as detail person? > >Firstly, a child born to two parents. The father dies and mother remarries. >New father adopts the son. How do I put this in? > >Secondly, two parents adopt or fostered children. I do not know names of >parents of these children. How is this put in? Adoptive children are entered under their biological par
9. Re: [TMG] Re: Funeral Card [0.871795]
Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 8:20:44 PM, Djschulteis@aol.com wrote: Dac> In a message dated 11/25/2003 6:48:10 PM Central Standard Time, Dac> TMG-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: >> I'm now a little confused. When people referred to "funeral card," I was >> envisioning something that seems more like what Jack is calling a "funeral >> service program." (You can tell I haven't been to many funerals nor >> acquired much funeral memorabilia!) What then is the card? I seem to have >> accidentally deleted the
10. Re: [TMG] Image sizes in word processor output [0.871795]
Richard Cleaveland wrote: >At 01:58 PM 11/28/2003, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >>On or about 08:27 11/27/03 a carrier pigeon from Richard Cleaveland >>delivered: >> >>>When I run the same report and direct it to Word 2000&+ the images turn >>>out to be more reasonably sized, but the size relationships do not >>>hold. For example, two pictures near each other: >>> p00017.jpg is 123 pixels wide, prints as 1.2 inches wide in Word. >>> s00017.jpg is 218 pixels wide, prints as 3.0 inches wide i
11. Re: [TMG] Add Witness Buglette still present [0.871795]
Hi Paul, Here's the way I just got it to occur... Two principles already exist in the data base. An existing marriage tag is there; open it; make additions to the memo box. F4>F3 to add a citation, F9 to close the citation. Click on the Other Witnesses tab. Click on the "+" to add a witness. **Hit F2** to check to see if the witness already exists. Escape when I find he doesn't. Click on the add person icon in the upper right corner. Add the name details, F4>F3 to site the same source. F9>F9 in quick succe
12. RE: [TMG] Pre-surname [0.871795]
Yes, the pre-surname field is intended for things link "van", "von" "de" "le" or any prefix in front of the name when you don't want that to affect the sorting. Thus van Gogh, with the van in the pre-surname field would sort under "G". The standard name style does not use the pre-surname field so you need to create a custom style to use it. I wish the Standard style included the pre-surname field (and the prefix field) in its output templates. Richard Damon -- rbrdamon@rcn,.com (Home) rdamon@beltronicsinc
13. RE: [TMG] TMG Full Version Plus Updates [0.871795]
Pat, If you have your original information, i.e. user id, registration number, etc., just download the 30 day trial version from the TMG site. Once downloaded, you will be able to enter your information to unlock it. Ron Bernier -----Original Message----- From: Enterkin Patricia H. [mailto:penterkin@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 9:34 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] TMG Full Version Plus Updates Would someone please tell me where I can download a full version of TMG V5 plus updat
14. Re: [TMG] How to generate index/TOC in Word 97 [0.871795]
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:58:49 -0600, Elizabeth Churchett wrote: > Terry, I'm not entirely sure I follow your instructions. > Perhaps they are for another version of Word, a later > more up-to-date one than mine? No, I'm using Word 97 > In my document, the > endnotes are already at the end of the document and in > their own section, so adding a section break before the > bibliography and moving the endnotes to the end of their > own section doesn't change anything. You can't move them to the end of their
15. RE: [TMG] Adobe files as exhibits [0.871795]
Kay Sturgeon wrote: > Thank you for answering our question. Yes Walt, you are absolutely right, > the .pdf files I have are from The Australian War Memorial so I wanted to > attach them "as they were" so to speak. Robin (Hi - yes I am back again to > annoy a few people for a few months) I will check out whether any of my > programs will do a conversion. Kay, I don't recall the points made in earlier posts on this topic, so perhaps this question has been answered already. How do you plan to share your wo
16. Re: [TMG] TMG5 Generations marriage import bug (not) [0.871795]
Ed said: >I disagree - it really is a bug. These people had been entered in the >same "family card" in Reunion and the marriage tag information failed to >transfer to TMG. I'm not sure of your point. I said that it works as it was designed (and I designed it ) but you still maintain that it is a bug. I'd understand if you don't like the design but that's different. As I understand it, you think that TMG should assume that people are married if they are on the same "family card" in Generations
17. Re: [TMG] Name nick, Name var and Name comm [0.871795]
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:26:12 -0800, Mike & Mary Cooley wrote: > I enter names with nicknames included, i.e. - Joseph > Thomas "Joe" "Tom" Collins. Will this be a problem? As always, it depends on how you want to use the data. First, it means that the person only appears once, under that full name. So if you look in the Picklist for "Collins, Tom" you won't find him there. Whether or not that's a problem probably depends on how many Collins you have in your dataset, and how well you know them. Then
18. RE: [TMG] UFT to TMG Conversion - First Attempt [0.871795]
Bob I had my mind elsewhere when I wrote about not being able to change the source data on import from UFT. Of course you can change the way it is imported. In Step 6 of the advanced wizard there are several options associated with sources. Just select the ones you wish to use, and experiment. In step 6, I would select all of the options in the "Other" category except "Import empty birth events" and I would only import the "Event types" that are used as a starting place. Good luck Myrnice Bob & Anne L
19. RE: [TMG] Orphaned Source [0.871795]
John Gregson wrote: > Is there any way to find what record(s) are using this Source. > > I have John Cardinal's TMG Utility, but it seems that it will not provide > the desired information; > mind you, I've only had John's Utility for one day, so I may have missed > something. > > Hope that someone can help. John, If you know the source number, you can use the "Person and Source Report" in TMG Utility to see which people have tags that reference the source. See http://www.johncardinal.com/tmgutil/persona
20. [TMG] TMG 5.10 Error Report: Repeat List F3 not working for Reference Field [0.871795]
I find that the Repeat list is not storing the values I enter into the Reference Field (in the upper right hand corner of the Person Details View). 1. I open the Reference field by double-clicking on it. 2. I type the [F3] key (which has always worked in previous versions) 3. I receive the message "No repeat values found for this field" So far, Repeat values [F3] seems to be working for other fields. Greg
21. RE: [TMG] Button names [0.871795]
Hi Terry, As a newbie to TMG I have also had problems about those buttons. Could they be labelled: Save format - this saves the definition file Save report - this saves the actual report Print report - this prints the actual report Sue Well, that's exactly what it does here -- save the report definition file. 'Course the problem is we're sometimes working with two separate files here -- the report definition, and also the report itself, if it's being sent to a file. I think that's the source of the con
22. Re: [TMG] Buglett v. 5.10 - new tag [0.871795]
Bobbie, If the 'fatal errors' that you describe are C0000005 errors, we know about that and the programmers are working on it. These errors come from using the keyboard and never come (as far as I know) in this context when using the mouse. A particular sequence to produce an error is useful as well as the first error message. There is no point to reporting error messages after the first (such if you click Ignore). Thanks for the help. Jim
23. RE: [TMG] Journal Reports-HTML Format [0.871795]
Ron Output to HTML is not available yet. You can get HTML data by using John Cardinals program Second Site but not in the Journal format. Myrnice Ron Chenier wrote on Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:50 PM > To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [TMG] Journal Reports-HTML Format > > Can I produce a Journal Report in HTML format or is this still waiting for > the next update? > > Ron Chinier
24. Re: [TMG] 5.10 Upgrade [0.871795]
Yes, I had the same experience. I decided to wait until tomorrow--maybe just too much traffic? Valorie Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:28 PM Subject: [TMG] 5.10 Upgrade > Is anyone having trouble upgrading? I tried the normal upgrade function from > within TMG and it failed three times. Then I tried to download the upgrade > from the site the optional way. It failed too. > > Byron Hill > > > ==== TMG Mailing List ==== >
25. Re: [TMG] Information on TMG User Group [0.871795]
In a message dated 11/18/2003 4:38:29 PM US Eastern Standard Time, chuckkjohnson@att.net writes: <
Viewing 1-25 of 1,639 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.519921