Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:oct +date:2001)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,286 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [TMG] Corruption Problems [1]
Re my problems with MRL & MPL -- I went to Windows Explorer and looked at the problem dataset. Under the column "file type," instead of a designation as "DBF" or "FPT," it is showing "Active Server Document." I have updated my virus definitions and run a system scan and things are coming up clean. Advice? Should I just delete this database and start over? It is salvageable and fixable? CheriC
2. [TMG] Create report to find people with "?" for Living [1]
Hi Everyone, I'm thinking about reposting my database to WorldConnect. Before doing that, I'd like to make sure that I fix mistakes I've made like leaving a "?" for Living for people who probably are living, but I don't know for sure. Folks born in the last 50 years or so. Suggestions on making a report to find them? Thanks! Michele
3. Re: [TMG] TMG & WinXP [1]
Don said: >Upgraded to 4.0d and got the message; ignored it again and everything >seems ok. > >So I don't know if it is just Microsoft being cranky or what but a quick >look seems to indicate that TMG is functioning ok. Microsoft contacted us some time ago to say that one of their XP beta testers had submitted TMG as an example of a program that they thought might be incompatible with that operating system. Microsoft explained that the released version of XP would recognize a hard-coded list of such
4. [TMG] Question on "Refresh" in FTST [1]
Good morning First, I'd like to thank all the kind people (Astrid, Jim, Allen, Bob and others) who responded concerning the viewing of two databases at once. Great help, and all the options are viable and workable :-) Now I have another question, this time on the "Refresh" option after editing a TMG database contained in a FTST project. I currently have two computers on which I have installed FTST. The machines have different hard disk configurations (home has two hard drives, work has five). FT
5. Re: [TMG] Re: FTST [1]
Nigel, See Bob's reply to you a few minutes ago. The download is being managed by a web store host (Digital River) on Wholly Genes behalf. The problem is with them, not Wholly Genes. Caroline Gurney Portsmouth, UK caroline@cmgurney.freeserve.co.uk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nigel Brown" To: Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:44 AM Subject: [TMG] Re: FTST > ----- Caroline's Original Message ----- No. It is because the form for the > billing a
6. [TMG] Re: sentences & paragraphs [1]
>Jane wrote: >> Confession made - here are the first of numerous basic questions: In my >> genealogy reports, the sentences are separated by commas, instead of >> periods. Don't know why. Teresa replied: >It's been a while, but I think you need a <[M0]> at the end of your sentence >structure. I am trying to remember what I changed so I will get back to you >if I think of it. Jane, If you are saying that following the sentence and before its memo part resides a semicolon, then yes the memo pla
7. Re: [TMG] Effect of Exclusion Markers in FTST [1]
Allen Mellen commented that the removal of the exclusion markers in P1 and/or P2 may have been by design since with item tips turned on you can now see the full contents of the memo field. If they were removed intentionally I would like to request that they be "put back" :). It does constitute a change in my data and upsets a complex system of accenting I have long used and loved. Now, since I can't exclude P2 from showing up on P1's screen (or vice versa), I also get P2's accent color showing up on P1's
8. Re: [TMG] Codes [1]
Cheri Casper wrote: >Lee - Can you clarify on the use of codes? I have often just put in a "hard >tab" in a memo field as opposed to using the tab code. When I output my >report, the hard tabs are functional and my material is correctly indented. >Are there times when this won't be the case and that would necessitate the >tab code? I guess I just don't understand why I need the code when putting >in a hard (or a hard return for that matter) seems to produce the results I >want. The main use of the carri
9. Re: [TMG] FTST characters and columns [1]
Delia said: >I have some questions about the characters in some of the windows on the >standard layout. It sounds like it is not finding the Wingdings font which it uses for those displays so it substitutes another. Wingdings is a standard Windows font. Do you have it? If so, then please write to me off list and include the value of your Regional Settings (from your Control Panel). -Bob
10. Re: [TMG] FTST- not responding [1]
wrote: > In a message dated 10/23/01 8:52:11 AM Central Daylight Time, > myrnice@bellsouth.net writes: > > > > I hope that no one will be deleting and/or refreshing many datasets when TMG > > v5.0 comes out. > > Why not? We get GEDCOMs and datasets from people online all the time. I > thought the whole purpose of this was so we could look at those datasets, and > move people from them to our dataset. Then that new dataset will need to be > deleted. > Teresa Ghee Elliott Teresa
11. Re: [TMG] FTST - Person View Marriages [1]
Paul OK, I changed back to the first spouse before I double clicked and of course the correct date was still there. Myrnice "Paul E. Lawrence" wrote: > Myrnice, > > I tried that but the wrond date return. For a person with two marriages, I > went to the Family View, the first wife was selected and the date was > there. Changed to the second wife and the date disappeared. Double clicked > on the focus individual and a date came back but it was the marriage date > for the first wife even though the secon
12. Re: [TMG] Need Help [1]
Lee, Thanks, will try that. Gene
13. FW: [TMG] Friends in TMG [1]
That works pretty well Joe and the sentence is OK in most cases. The only problem? is when "Fred" and "Joe" (male friends)get called spouses in some reports and are described as having no children! Not really a problem and may be appropriate sometimes! Peter www.duckspool.com -----Original Message----- From: Joe Makowiec [mailto:makowiec@nycap.rr.com] Sent: 18 October 2001 01:31 AM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [TMG] Friends in TMG At 01:17 AM 10-18-2001 +0100, Peter Goldfield wrote: >1. I'd lik
14. Re: [TMG] Is XP Ready to run? [1]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Reigel" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 09:23 Subject: [TMG] Is XP Ready to run? > Don, > > Thanks much for the encouragement. I've concluded that running XP on the new machine is the only way to go. Mainly it's the stability issues that drive that conclusion, and I really don't want to start with Win2k and upgrade later. But I've run the XP compatibility checker and find a lot of concerns - enough that I'm consi
15. [TMG] A brief look at FTST [1]
Go and find out. The Mongoose looks at Family Tree SuperTools I have to admit that I was disappointed when Bob Velke first announce that Family Tree SuperTools would be released before TMG 5. I have used TMG since version 3.0 for Windows was released and I am fond of its strengths and impatient with its weaknesses. I'm as eager for TMG 5 as anyone. Since Family Tree SuperTools will not allow data input and will have only Visual Chart Form reports, I wondered what benefit FTST offers to the us
16. Re: [TMG] WhollyGenes [1]
Tom, > I am having trouble reaching "WhollyGenes.com". I keep getting timed out. Any > suggestions? Bob Velke said that he was going to be doing some housekeeping on the website this weekend. Maybe that's running into your attempt to download the patches. Keep at it until you are successful. If necessary, wait a day or two. I've also seen enormous problems with the Internet since the middle of yesterday afternoon. Someone seems to have dumped molasses into the pipes. Jim
17. Re: [TMG] Large Word Document [1]
Larry Voreis wrote: > Can anyone tell me what the threshold is before you start seeing > problems with the number of footnotes in an MSWord document. My book is > now over 300 pages with about 800 footnotes - with no problems - using > the master document feature. I will be adding narative reports which > will easily be over 150 pages, with probably another 800 or 1000 > footnotes. Anyone had footnote problems with a document of this magnitude? I've got one with over 4100 notes that's no problem. Terry R
18. [TMG] data entry [1]
Well, here's my dumb question for the day. Both in Roots III and FTM, it was possible to just key in a few letters or hit an F key to repeat information so it wasn't necessary to have to type the whole thing out over and over. Is there such a think in TMG? Barb
19. Re: [TMG] Witness Roles? [1]
Ran into an interesting situation when entering wills. There are times when an individual in my dataset signed his/her name as a witness on a will. Wanted to enter that information in a tag but didn't want to create a record for the deceased (no known relationship, could just be a neighbor). There was no way, I could find, to assign a principal a witness designation. Created a role "DocWit" so I could enter the tag and assign the principal the "DocWit" role. If later I find the deceased person is of more i
20. Re: [TMG] RE: TMG Up-to-date version [1]
AGH3RD@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 10/3/01 9:45:15 PM Central Daylight Time, > rfbrogger@InfoAve.Net writes: > > > FTST is ready" or "TMG5 is ready" are the only meaningful reports I > > can think of. > > > > Richard Brogger > > > > Maybe Bob should just announce that TMG5 will be released Christmas Day 2004 > and then surprise us when it comes out "early" . > > > > -- > His Jadedness, Andy; Lord Tofu2u2, Earl of the Jade Stick > "Nec petita nec cupita approbatio tua" > > Death to terror
21. Re: [TMG] Respecting privacy [1]
I too would like that URL. I have people from Texas. Linda ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:06 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] Respecting privacy > In a message dated 10/28/2001 1:46:43 PM US Eastern Standard Time, > clcasper@sprynet.com writes: > > > > This man lives in Texas and the state of Texas officially puts this > > information (birth, marriage, divorce, death) on the web (so if you live in > > Texas be aware
22. Re: [TMG] seeking keystroke combinations [1]
Holly Hendricks wrote: > > I was looking for a keystroke that would do the equivalent of > clicking on the 'new person+' button in the upper right when entering > a marriage tag and adding a new person as the spouse in the second > principal field. > Holly, Hold the Shift key down and press tab to back up to the "new person+" button. Using v4.0d from Principal 2 field, it takes eight presses of the Tab key while holding down Shift. It won't be any faster than using the mouse, but if moving your arm t
23. Re: [TMG] Large Word Document [1]
This is how I would set up a string cite using Terry's examples (based on a legal model where elements are separated by semicolons; an identical model is detailed in the reference manual used by office technology students at the community college where I teach): 6. Meyer, Adventurers of Purse and Person, p. 450 (shows her as Peter's first wife); Montague, Geneology of Peter Montague, 1621 to 1894, p.1; Corkill, et al., "The Montague Family," Supplement to Pamunkey Neighbors, Vol. II, p.1 ( "probably marrie
24. Re: [TMG] Picklist [1]
John HG Tinker wrote: >I assume there's no way to sort the picklist by name and dob. If you mean at the same time, then the answer is no. You may sort by either (but not both) using the Sort option from the top menu while in the Picklist. Hope this helps - ---------- Lee Hoffman/KY E-mail: lhoffman@acm.org TMG Tips: My website: -------------- A user of the best genealogy program, The Master Genealogist (TMG)
25. Re: [TMG] Gedcom export/import [1]
Cheri Casper wrote: > > Richard - It is my understanding that the LDS church is moving away from the > GEDCOM standard to something new. It is my suspicion that the majority of > the genealogy community will follow the lead set by the LDS church. > Therefore, I would also surmise that "future versions of GEDCOM" may not be > a reality. > As I remember there are/were two parallel projects for developing a new protocol for transferring data between genealogical programs with the least amount of loss. The
Viewing 1-25 of 2,286 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.539918