Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:oct +date:2004)
Viewing 1-25 of 867 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. RE: [TMG] Childless couples in Journal reports [1]
Tracy said: (My other publishing tip that gets rave reviews is just the simple step of listing the ancestors for that section in the heading of the page, so that each page has a visual line to the original ancestor) This is very intriguing -- and a very helpful idea. Could you elaborate? Is this something you "add later"? How does it differ from the (Henry4, Henry3, John2, Sam1) that are included with each person? Pat (in Tucson) Scio vestri atavi est nosce te ipsum (to know your ancestors is to be
2. Descendants Indented Report - Spouse Issue [1]
I want to create a Descendant Indented Report for 1 individual and several generations of descendants. I want the spouses for each generation, but I do not get them for the last generation of children even though I have selected "spouses to print". What am I doing wrong? Diana Powell
3. Filter help, please [1]
I'm trying to find everyone with the tag: "father-son-possible" so that I can make a new tag for them. I understand that to do this, I need to filter the project. What are the coordinates, please? I can't seem to find the right variations..............thanks in advance..... Carol Collins
4. RE: [TMG] TMG 5.15 - Domestic Partnership [1]
Ken I have a Partnership Tag in the Marriage Tag Group with the following sentence [P] was the partner of <[PO]> <[D]> <[L]> || [P] is the partner of <[PO]> <[L]> <([M2])> The exact wording of the sentence may depend on your preference and the custom of where you live. In New Zealand "partner" seems to cover all those who are living together - and sometimes it is also used for those who are married Jim Jim & Beverley Payne NEW ZEALAND jr_bjpayne@xtra.co.nz Our web page has moved to the fol
5. Re: [TMG] customized button disappears from toolbar - [1]
In a message dated 10/30/2004 8:57:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, deblack@juno.com writes: >the point is - >in the - Custom Toolbar Manager - >I must save as - and a name must be put in the 'the of toolbar' box >I can use custom.tbr or I can put another name in the box - >must all names have -.tbr ------------- You do not want to add the .tbr extension. TMG will do that automatically when you give the toolbar a name and Save it. Just enter the name - like Custom, My Favorite, or whatever. Virginia
6. Re: [TMG] Question [1]
At 08:50 PM 10/14/2004, Marilyn and Dave Spilka wrote: >I am a new and rookie user of this powerful software. I am scanning all >of my documents into electronic format and I would like to know what you >suggest... > >I have the option of saving the documents as .pdf (Adobe Acrobat) or >.jpg. Would one or the other be better for future retrieval? Considering >how softwares change and evolve. > >Thanks for your opinion, > >Dave You say they are "documents." If these are to some extent hand-written o
7. Re: [TMG] OT - Conversion for Latitude / Longitude [1]
On or about 10/04/04 20:46 a carrier pigeon from Kevin Sholder delivered: >All, > >I purchased a GPS a while back and have been very happy with it, except for >the fact I can't seem to get it to display in typical DD MM SS format, it >displays 390 19.531. Which is not TMG friendly. So I've found online a web >page that will convert to the preferred format, but if I'm not on line, it >is of little value. The page is: http://jeeep.com/details/coord/ and use >the Minute Decimal routine. > >I'm looking for
8. RE: [TMG] flag changes [1]
Stuart wrote: > I have a custom flag with 3 values that pertain to a cleanup > operation. > -,N,C > > The default is "-" meaning "not evaluated". > "N" means "needs work" > "C" means "corrected" > > I want to change the default value so that all _NEW_ persons > that I add to the database from now on will automatically > have a value of "C" ("corrected"). > > perhaps > C,N,- > > Question: if I make this change will I lose any of the values > presently assigned to this flag? Will it corrupt or harm the > flag
9. Re: [TMG] GEDCOM export anomaly [1]
John, The GEDCOM is correct for your data as it stands. This is a data issue. Here's the issue... A marriage group tag denotes a marriage based on the principals assigned to the tag. The following are five different marriages. Marriage group tag P1=John Marriage group tag P1=John P2=Jane Marriage group tag P1= Jane Marriage group tag P1=John P2=Sally Marriage group tag P1 = Sally Looking at John Andrew Little (3) You have 3 marriage group tags Marriage P1=John P2=Sheila <== marriage 1 Ceremony P1=Joh
10. Re: [TMG] TMG 5.15 - Domestic Partnership [1]
Thanks, Jim & Darrell I have created a Domestic Partnership tag in the Other group; this seem to do what I wanted to do. Ken Healy ----- Original Message ----- From: "JimBev" To: Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:56 PM Subject: RE: [TMG] TMG 5.15 - Domestic Partnership > Ken > > I have a Partnership Tag in the Marriage Tag Group with the following > sentence > > [P] was the partner of <[PO]> <[D]> <[L]> || [P] is the partner of <[PO]> > <[L]> <([
11. RE: [TMG] Control P2 printing in output? [1]
Peggy, I have a list of commonly used abbreviations on my website below. It might help, since at times we seem to be speaking a foreign language. Teresa Ghee Elliott I'm getting organized this year. Join me in August. For Rutherford County TN Cemeteries www.Rutherfordcemeteries.home-page.org For TMG sentences -----Original Message----- From: Terry Reigel [mailto:terry@reigelridge.com] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 1:28
12. RE: [TMG] GedStar Pro [1]
Hi: GedStar Pro takes up 1161 KB for about 2,500 people. Darrell -----Original Message----- From: Kith-n-Kin Sent: Oct 12, 2004 12:16 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [TMG] GedStar Pro This is very interesting. I would ask, however, how much memory is in these devices? Some of you have really big databases, and if you are also putting in reports and pictures, and such, must be pretty big? Pat (in Tucson) Darrell A. Martin a native Vermonter in exile in Illinois darrellm@
13. Re: [TMG]One Note - (was TMG- Post it Notes) [1]
I found info about it on Microsoft's page. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/FX010858031033.aspx It has to be purchased and isn't inlcuded with Windows. Peggy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Bernier" To: Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 12:26 PM Subject: Re: [TMG]One Note - (was TMG- Post it Notes) > Bob, > > I have Office XP on my computer and I don't see anything called One Note. > Is this an option that you have to install from the CD or does it
14. RE: [TMG] PROBLEM WITH ADD PERSON SURETY [1]
Tags without date, place, memo and source aren't created. Teresa Ghee Elliott I'm getting organized this year. Join me in August. For Rutherford County TN Cemeteries www.Rutherfordcemeteries.home-page.org For TMG sentences -----Original Message----- From: AGH3RD@aol.com [mailto:AGH3RD@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:50 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [TMG] PROBLEM WITH ADD PERSON SURETY In a message dated 10
15. Re: [TMG] PROBLEM WITH ADD PERSON SURETY [1]
Jill Morelli wrote: > > I know others have waded in, and I am sure you have done this but not only > do you put a surety value on the variation tag but also on the primary name. > If you did nothing more then put the person's name in you would still put a > 1,2, or 3 to the right of the primary name. I assume you are doing this but > all the responses have been about a name variation tag. > Jill, the Primary Name tag is a Nam-Var tag. It is marked primary and shows in the upper part of the Details. T
16. List of people with exhibits [1]
Is there a way in 4.0d to get a list of the people who have exhibits?
17. RE: [TMG] GedStar Pro [1]
Darrell...... Awesome, ain't it? With all the colors, and all the notes, and EVERYTHING!!!! Linda "All incoming and outgoing email is scanned by Norton's Anti-Virus, updated daily". -----Original Message----- From: Darrell Martin [mailto:darrellm@sprynet.com] Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 1:48 AM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] GedStar Pro Greetings: When I first installed GedStar on my monochrome Palm m105, it immediately became an indispensable weapon in the battle against brick walls. N
18. RE: [TMG] Census citation (was: "Systems" in general (was: Betty's census ...)) [1]
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 08:01:52 -0700, Carol Hall wrote: > Also, I want to apologize to Terry Reigel. I was a bit > testy last night and it may have come across in my post > to the list. Thanks, but not necessary. You may have been feeling testy, but I just saw it as being firm in your positions, which is fine. > I think it makes sense to enter it using both the > [SERIES] label and the [FILM] label, as in: > > ... Microfilm Publication [SERIES]-[FILM] (Full footnote) > > ... Microfilm Publicatio
19. RE: [TMG] Age calculator & irregular dates [1]
I'd prefer that solution. On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 17:07, John Cardinal wrote: > Robin Lamacraft wrote: > > Darrell, Gordon, Andy, etc > > > > It seems as if there is a possible conceptual solution but it would require > > an extension of the space allowed for irregular dates. > > > > Try this for size, allow a symbol (say ||) within the irregular date field > > to delimit the irregular date from the following an user-provided estimate > > of that date. The date estimate only being used for age calculati
20. Re: [TMG] Problem with Journal Report and Filter [1]
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 18:51:23 -0400, Eric Haas wrote: > Okay, I think I've figured out what's going on here. The > Journal report will not print out for anyone who isn't > connected to at least one other person. A focus person > with just a spouse will print, as will anyone with > descendants, but any isolated strays will not print. > > So, in order to get what I want, I will go with the > Journal report as is, and then figure out a filter for an > LOP to just print out the strays that the Journal report >
21. Re: [TMG] Filter help, please [1]
Thank you, Lee. Someday I may get this under my brain Carol Collins Lee Hoffman wrote: Carol Collins wrote: >I'm trying to find everyone with the tag: "father-son-possible" so that I >can make a new tag for them. I understand that to do this, I need to >filter the project. What are the coordinates, please? I can't seem to >find the right variations..............thanks in advance..... Select to run a List of People report from the Reports menu of the Main Menu. For the Subject
22. Re: [TMG] Extra semicolon in Journal and Narrative reports [1]
Thanks, Terry. I guess I do have a situation somewhat like that but my own OBIT tag has NO SENTENCE so I thought I could avoid the problem. However, it did print my MEMO even without a sentence. I thought that rather strange because I have seen tags with just [M] in the sentence, so I initially assumed it was needed. --but it worked anyway, so I was thinking "Well mine prints anyway -- I don't need that". Since your reply, I changed my sentence to -- and then the Memo quit printing; not what I wa
23. Re: [TMG] Childless couples in Journal reports [1]
Thanks, Terry. That at least gives me a reasonalbe compromise with which to experiment. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Reigel" To: Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] Childless couples in Journal reports > On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:50:12 -0400, Dan W. Olds wrote: > > I use Journal reports. In the descendancy type of > > report, children who did not themselves have children are > > not continued into a paragraph of their own
24. RE: [TMG] Custom Toolbar too wide for screen [1]
Just position the cursor over the vertical bar at the end of one of the toolbar sections, hold down the mouse left button and drag slightly down until a second row appears. Take some trials, but you then have two times the space. You could change words to icons on the bar, but then you have to remember what icon was what. John -----Original Message----- From: bob gillis [mailto:rpgillis@bellatlantic.net] Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:06 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] Custom Toolbar too wid
25. Re: I would appreciate fewer abbreviations [1]
"Peggy Baldwin" wrote: > > Boy, oh, boy! I have the most difficult time on > this list. The > abbreviations are flying like > crazy. I would sure appreciate it if people would > use whole words, at the > least the first > time they use a term. The TMG abbreviations are not > standard anywhere else, > so it's > not like we would come to this list knowing them. > > Peggy Dear Peggy, Sorry about the confusing use of abbreviations. *We* know what *we* are saying, and we fo
Viewing 1-25 of 867 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.529918