Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:sep +date:2000)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,588 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. Re: [TMG] Picture sizes [1]
Like Teresa, I found that the Photoshop .tif pictures will not display. rondie At 08:59 PM 8/31/2000 -0400, you wrote: >Teresa wrote: > >>> One thing I did >just discover is the picture that would not show was saved as a .tif file >with LZW compression. I saved it as a .jpg and it works fine. So maybe my >problem is solved?! << > >Take a look at the top of the manual page 157. As long as you save images >in one of these explicitly supported formats, you should be able to view/use >them. > >Cliff Watts -
2. Re: [TMG] Uses of research log [1]
Have you considered an "artificial person"..maybe named RESEARCH, or whatever... with the sources as events, or notes in Research's life history? You can see at a glance which works/authors you have previously consulted, with more detailed notes in the memo sections of each event. does this make sense to you? rondie At 06:16 PM 9/6/2000 -0500, you wrote: >Teresa -- > >We are both on the same wave length...I was referring to negative searches >before TMG not future ones. I suppose my work is now divided
3. Re: [TMG] sorting picklist [0.970183]
-----Original Message----- From: bob gillis >They are sorted in ID # sequence. At present there is no way for a >secondary sort. > >bob gillis > Sorry Bob, they are not sorted by ID#. I have four persons with the same name, and the ID#s are: 51, 1448, 78, 3407. #51 had been last, but I noticed that the second name was spelled with 'o' instead of with 'e'. I changed it, and #51 moved to first spot. The four are arranged in order of the 'Last Edited' date, with the most recent f
4. [TMG] Advice onEspia Images for FoxPro [0.970183]
I have imported from UFT into TMG Gold Edition 4.0 and upgraded to 4.0a When I go to the Exhibit Log to read the text messages [Death, Birth Notices from newspapers] which have come over from UFT I can read them. Then when I exit to get back I get the following message: Espia Images for FoxPro Espia for Windows has disconnected To reconnect, release and reload the ESPIA_I.FLL library I don't think that this has anything to do with the transfer from one program to another. I have found the application i
5. Re: [TMG] birthdates changed along the way [0.970183]
At 04:54 PM 9/11/2000, you wrote: >It was only *after* 4 years of trying to find my mgm's birth (in Manchester, >Eng) that we found her birthday was actually 30 JUN 1875 and not June 8th as >she always asserted. The odd thing is that her first son was born on June >30, 1896 and we've been left wondering why she changed *her* birthdate... > >Any ideas, anyone? Arlene --- Where did you get the date of 30 June, 1875? Was it from the GRO in London or from the local reregister? Do you have a photocopy or a
6. Re: [TMG] "Gremlins" in Death Tags? [0.970183]
Astrid, Yesterday I wanted to have a look at the Master Place List after enterring a lot op people. I got a list without Countries, States and Counties. I could not get it going. Then I closed the TMG and restarted the program; hereafter the correct MPL came up and worked allright. I can't understand your or my trouble. Harm At 20:43 18-9-00 +1100, you wrote: >Hi everyone! > >Has anyone else noticed this? > >In my mother's Person View. Her Birth date is 12 Mar1925, her Death date >is 14 Jul 1978.
7. [TMG] Re: Data Corruption (UFT) [0.970183]
>Earlier today Neil Bell commanted: > >Has anyone else experienced this problem: > >I individually entered several hundred short place names. All went well >and they printed correctly on reports. This is an example of a data element that is not in the GEDCOM "standard". Yesterday I urged caution about using TMG features that are outside the GEDCOM standard. Short place names an example of where the neat capabilities of UFT and TMG can come back to bite one in the future - when one is least prepared.
8. [TMG] Positive Reporting [0.970183]
I am a long time genealogy software user. From Roots III in the late 80's to UFT the last few years. I converted to TMG 4.0a about August 20, 2000. I have been patiently watching the list since I converted and we have all read hundreds of stories, mostly negative. Finally, today I read a positive message. Someone posted that they haven't had any problems and wanted to let the list know. This is great!!! It really works as advertised. Crazy thing was that I have been sitting here for three weeks usin
9. [TMG] Tabs in Individual Narratives [0.970183]
When creating my memo fields, I am using the tab codes to create indentations. However, when I generate my individual narrative, the tabbed indentations are meager . . . approximately 1/4 of an inch when all publication conventions would indicate that they should be 1/2 inch. Is there anyway to adjust the depth of the indention WITHOUT having to put TWO tab codes in my memo fields? Cheri Casper 1220 W. 13th Street, Spokane, WA 99204 Phone/Fax: (509) 624-4497 E-mail: clcasper@sprynet.com Researching
10. [TMG] Import From BK - Source Problem [0.970183]
Today I received my TMG from Wholly Genes Software, and, after following the tutorial in the getting started Manual, I imported my Brothers Keeper database, some 18000+ names. The import seemed to work OK (I haven't had time to check the whole thing yet) except for my sources. The import completely butchered all my sources. I don't fancy retyping in all that data for 18000 names. Anyone have this problem and have any solutions?? I don't have time for this. This TMG was supposed to assist my documentation,
11. Re: [TMG] Name Variations [0.970183]
Ron Chenier wrote: > > Example, Antoine CHENIER, born and baptised in Alfred, Ontario 10 Jan >1878. > > He moves to the state of NY and lives the rest of his life there and >raises a > > large family, for some reason under the name CHENEY. The reason was probably prejudice against Franco-Americans, or a desire to visibly acculturate, or some combination of these. Here in northern New Hampshire, I've seen dozens if not hundreds of examples of names of French origin which have been Anglicized. In some c
12. [TMG] TMG finally made it to Arkansas! [0.970183]
Hi there! Just because I received several encouraging sympathy notes from the list, I wanted to let y'all know TMG arrived today. I will be studying the manual and inserts before I even attempt to do a UFT - TMG switchover..... Thanks again, everyone!! Carol K.
13. Re: [TMG] Hey, I am buried [0.970183]
In a message dated 9/28/2000 4:36:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, earbar@netway.com writes: << [P] attended the funeral of [PO] just to see if it would work...it doesn't...here's what I get (with All Plus Witnessed checked) on the individual narrative report of the Father; He attended the funeral of an unknown person. Is there a solution for this? >> Beth, P is the variable for the principle, PO is the other principle (when you have 2) W is the variable for the witness and WO is other witnesses
14. [TMG] re: launch error [0.970183]
Did that and still nothing. Seems a file is missing bviews.exe I've re-installed and still cant get it open. tracey william roberts wrote: Try putting your TMG CD #2 in the CD drive before you open the Red Book. Myrnice
15. Re: [TMG] Website Citation [0.970183]
In a message dated 9/24/00 10:46:34 PM Central Daylight Time, MikeOlds@pacbell.net writes: > What I do wasn't the issue. I indicated what I was likely to do. What is > your response to the substance of my post? Are you seriously going to > contend that, reviewing the last 400 posts on this board, this program is > ready for the general public? > Who ever said it was even aimed at the general public?? The general public isn't even for proper genealogy - much less a program to do it with. TMG is a
16. RE: [TMG] Copious Ancestors [0.970183]
Tim, While I agree that some of the numbers show better quality you have to be careful about what they mean. For instance I'm currently going through my database and using my "Assumption" source. This is for when I have information that I believe to be true but no documentation yet. For instance no marriage source but I've found them on 4 census reports so I assume they were married and use the assumption as my source along with the census citations. That's 5 citations for one event, however the surety is
17. Re: [TMG] Second Request Re Registry [0.970183]
In a message dated 9/6/00 4:20:11 PM Central Daylight Time, clcasper@sprynet.com writes: << Kristi - I am not getting the blue screen of death but a total crash of the system which means doing a full restore of the hard disk and reinstallation of all programs. >> Cheri, I think you may have a problem elsewhere. Crashes such as this are fairly rare. I do have problems with TMG locking up on me and I have gotten the blue screen of death once, but I think Compuserve caused it. Is there a friend who
18. Re: [TMG] Point of Reference [0.970183]
At 21:27 05/09/2000 -0700, you wrote: >Boy, do I NOT like the tone of these messages. ""As long as I'm having >trouble please help me but, when others have trouble, look the other way."" >We have the TMG product that we do have because of the dedication, efforts >and brilliance of Bob Velke - whom we often choose to praise. Absolutely. It's perfectly normal for us to not use ALL the enhancements offered in a given release. And there aren't many who use ALL the features available in any version of T
19. RE: [TMG] Source Element Glossary or Dictionary? [0.970183]
Teresa, Thanks for the suggestions, they will certainly help. I have dabbled with the templates and know whereof you speak. > just has more information. The way I learned to do a footnote was to start > small and build big. So start with the Person's name, type of record, where > to find the record, the repository, the address of the repository. Then the > person looking for the record can easily retrace your foot steps. They drive > to the repository, go in, look in the volume you name on the roll y
20. RE: [TMG] Adopted lines (long and opinionated) [0.970183]
Well Said, Darrell! I beg to differ on only one point. > 5. A genealogical program that tries to handle all the possible > societal relationships involving the conception and rearing of > children is doomed to failure. Any attempt in this direction by an > existing program based on the father, mother, child relationship will > probably be quirky and beset by bugs, but will almost certainly be > delayed in its appearance even worse than Microsoft products. (Sorry, > couldn't resist.) I have been getting
21. Re: [TMG] UFT - Immigration detail line pipes [0.970183]
Marilyn: Check the role sentence in UFT and see if it had the detailA and detailB codes in it and if you had data in detailA and detailB. Paul At 05:09 PM 9/10/2000 EDT, you wrote: >In a message dated 09/10/2000 1:43:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >wmroberts@worldnet.att.net writes: > >> I believe if you check the sentence structure that uses those data that you >> will find a [D3] or a [Dn] (n indicating some numeric value) that addresses >> the variables in the detail field. the first field is [D1]. t
22. Re: [TMG] Wish List [0.970183]
Robin Lamacraft wrote: > > Unfortunately, Cheri life is as simple as that. You have probably only > found that click up/down feature in packages that don't support the > TMG-style witness feature. > Hi Robin, While I can see problems when witness tags are involved, I can also see a big advantage to being able to move tags up or down much like we move entries in the Master Place List. It may not work for all occasions and there are times when a feature must be disabled yet it is there for those times it
23. Re: [TMG] Reports/Genreg.doc [0.970183]
Earlier today Arlene asked: >I generated a report and can't find it anywhere. It was supposed to be a >"descendant's family journal" type of report that I was able to get in UFT. >The [Reports/Genreg.doc] is the name TMG gave to it. Recall that the TMG report writer is based on Windows 3.1 and that permits only 8 characters for a file name. So this can't be a valid file name. >Anyone any idea how I can find that report...(I even tried a "find" with no >luck) Try going back to the report definitio
24. Re: [TMG] Re: Viewing tags in Logical Order [0.970183]
DHunter888@aol.com wrote: >How can I sort my tags for viewing in a logical order when there is no date >attached? For example, I may not have birthdates for all the children, yet >they will be listed at the bottom of my subject following his/her death date. You can enter a Sort Date for a tag. This date will _never_ print. This probably means that you need to add a Birth tag to each person without one. In such a case, you may want to also click on the Sentence button of the Tag Entry Screen, and modi
25. [TMG] ancestry free trial [0.970183]
Has anyone tried the free trial that came with TMG? I tried it and it tells me invalid access code. Teresa
Viewing 1-25 of 2,588 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.489925