Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:sep +date:2002)
Viewing 1-25 of 2,594 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. RE: [TMG] Scanners and resolution [1]
Kathryn, I increase the size of all of my scans. However, I use a rule of thumb of producing no image greater than 14" in either direction (The file size becomes too big for my 512mb RAM). Generally I just set it at 200% and run with it. However, I use 150% and 186% for some and 400%, for example, on those tiny photos produced by the kiosks in public places. I have even scanned at 800% in many cases. The reasoning is the same as yours -- I can always scale down by throwing away detail, it is very difficul
2. Re: [TMG] Re: TMG-D Digest V02 #1516 [1]
Tom Norris wrote: >I have been lurking for quite some time and saw a work around for this >Digest Attachment problem on this list (it's been some time back, it worked >in OE v5.0 and now in OE v5.5 for me). Someone may have already described >this work around and I missed it but in the event they didn't... > > >From Outlook Express' Inbox: > 1. Right Click the TMG-D-request@rootsweb.com message you want to view >(Subject 'TMG-D Digest V02 #1516' in this case) > 2. Click the "Properties" selection
3. RE: [TMG] A second Site question [1]
Sam Here are a few ideas of things to try: In TMG Bring up Frank L Stevens in person view and, under the Windows menu, select image. If you don't see it then your problem is in TMG Open preferences and go to Current Project Options. Make sure the exhibit Folder path is set correctly. If nothing else works, try a reindex and optimize . In Second Site Try closing and the opening SS again. Make sure TMG is closed when you open SS. Double check to make sure you have the correct project and dataset sel
4. Re: [TMG] OT: Just out of curiosity [1]
#1 also. Jill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Thiel" To: Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:01 PM Subject: Re: [TMG] OT: Just out of curiosity > #1 > > > > >GenerationGoneBy@cs.com wrote: > > > >>This really has nothing to do with TMG, but I am curious, how many of you > >>are: > >> > >>1) Using TMG 5.03 exclusively despite the fact that it isn't finished yet. > >> > >>2) Using 5.03 and 4.0d together so that you can learn 5.0, yet still > >>print
5. Re: [TMG] OT: Genealogy Special [1]
At 10:50 AM 5/09/2002 -0400, JRAYMOND651@aol.com wrote: >I've had the same message several times in the last week, including this AM. >Did you notice that they're offering a "Memorial Day special" during Labor >Day? (grin) > > >Jon Raymond >St. Paul Park, MN >http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~raymond Nope. I always confuse them, too. Walt
6. [TMG] F2 Editing [1]
When I am in a source edit screen, I can click on F2 and bring up a list of things I have put in that field before. I noticed I have several very similar fields. Is there a way to edit this list and combine those? Teresa Ghee Elliott
7. Re: [TMG] February [1]
Richard, That would be a niceity. But calendars are a regional thing also. For instance, You would have to mark the transition from the Julian calendar to Gregorian calendar based on the region it occured in. Most Roman Catholic Regions Changed in the 1500's most Protestants in the 1700's, Russian changed in the 1900's. Some regions had a instant change. On oct so and so, we shall change the calendar so the next day is 11 days less. Other regions had a transistional change, over the next 10 years we
8. Re: [TMG] V4.0d Individual Narrative and Detail [1]
Peter Hill wrote: > I understand what you are saying, but what I wrote for > Deliverance, who was the witness, was a custom sentence, which I would > have expected to appear on her Individual Detail report, even if followed > by the custom memo for the principal. Instead, the custom witness sentence > appeared only on the narrative, and only the principal's memo appeared on > the Detail. Granted that the two reports are not supposed to be parallel > (but to a large extent, they are) I fail to see why someo
9. Re: [TMG] Formatting Narratives [1]
At 10:27 PM 9/5/2002 -0400, you wrote: >I just learned how to format narratives -- I've been reading the help >file...it is going to rain, sleet, and snow. Do a lot of you use this >formatting options or do you prefer to edit this kind of information in a >word processor? I use this formatting as I enter data. I often print a report to find that I want to make some formatting changes. I then do this in TMG as the change is made once and I don't have to worry about it again especially in reports that a
10. Re: [TMG] Print Screen for v5.03 [1]
At 09:26 PM 9-7-2002 +0930, Bryan Wetton wrote: >The unfortunate part of Prntscrn is that you have to use all the screen or >edit it later. Alt-PrintScreen picks up only the current window. Joe -- Joe Makowiec can be reached at: http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe http://makowiec.org/
11. RE: [TMG] Re:Dave Conover Retiring [1]
Only 100 pops? Dave is worth much much more than that for the help and support and understanding he has shown over the years. All the best Dave, and thanks - pop pop pop Lorna McIntosh 55 Queens Rd Waikanae, 6454, NZ mailto:Lorna.Henderson@paradise.net.nz Phone (04) 904 0047 -----Original Message----- From: Brianabuckeye@aol.com [mailto:Brianabuckeye@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2002 10:15 a.m. To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] Re:Dave Conover Retiring I suggest a 100 popgun salute as an of
12. [TMG] List Messages [1]
Lee, The only messages that I have received are the ones from you and the responses from other list members to your message post. As far as SPAM filters go, EV1 has added that, but all they do is put SPAM: infront of the suspect message. Also, my other lists, M-L, BAVARIA, BAV-ANC all are working. Klaus Dieter Cook Houston, Texas
13. [TMG] Custom Source Types [1]
I have decided to *mark* all of my custom sources with an asterisk at the end of the name of the Source Type. These are sources that I have previously modified but am now marking. I am finding that if I open up the Custom Source by using Edit, adding the asterisk to the end of the Source Type and closing with an F9 the asterisk is *not* saved. I have to add the asterisk, tab through the templates and then save. Sometimes I have to repeat this type, tab & save process twice before the asterisk is saved.
14. Re: [TMG] Off Topic messages [1]
Richard Brogger wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I do not object to OT messages and in fact enjoy them but some > subscribers do object. Are you taking over from Lee as Administrator? Just asking as haven't seen a message from him since the list moderation fiasco. -- ======================================================================== See my homepage at http://www.iansinger.com Get free unlimited non-commercial web pages at http://www.rootsweb.com I am near Toronto Canada, can I tell wher
15. Re: [TMG] Master Source List [1]
AGH3RD@aol.com wrote: >The Source is that which contains the information that we are going to >created tags for. >The Citation Detail is where within the source the actual information we are >placing in the tages can be found and what that information actually is. >The Tag is nothing more than a mini-report based on the Source and CD. While the difference is subtle, I would say it a like this: The source document is that which contains the information that we are going to enter in tags. The Source is that
16. Re: [TMG] OT: Just out of curiosity [1]
In a message dated 9/26/02 12:41:13 PM, GenerationGoneBy@cs.com writes: > This really has nothing to do with TMG, but I am curious, how many of you > are: > > 1) Using TMG 5.03 exclusively despite the fact that it isn't finished yet. > This is me....settling in to 5.03 nicely. Probably because I don't use the reports as much as others do. I really like what I'm getting from 5.03 -- I like the layouts, etc. Corky
17. Re: [TMG] Accent Ancestors-grandparents, aunts & uncles, cousins? [1]
The easiest way to accomplish this is to make use of the Related By flag, setting your ancestors at A, aunts and uncles at U, and cousins at C, then setting the Accent to look at the Related By flag. If you are still using 4.0d, then you can use a list of people to set the flags for you, if you are up to 5.03, then you will need to set the flags manually. Tricia
18. Re: [TMG] Re:Dave Conover Retiring [1]
In a message dated 09/23/2002 6:16:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Brianabuckeye@aol.com writes: > I suggest a 100 popgun salute as an offer of thanks for the help Dave as > given us. > > Brian L. Cole > Pop Bob Robert Evans Page A man who doesn't read has no advantage over one who can't. Mark Twain
19. Re: [TMG] Mossy gravestones [1]
Doug, Take an umbrella! And here's something else you might not have thought of. A flashlight. By shining a flashlight at different angles across the inscription you can see what you might not have been able to discern otherwise. Of course you may have to wait till the sun goes down! As for the rain -- that's what makes these trips fun! There is nothing that beats walking through a peaceful graveyard in the rain reading inscriptions. The last time that happened to me I enjoyed every m
20. Re: [TMG] Re: Photo organizing [1]
I'm not familiar with Photopackrat, but I use a simple program called CompuPic from Photodex. It's great and easy to use. It is found at http://www.photodex.com/ Like you, I have scanned lots of photos and 35mm slides. CompuPic is a great thumbnail viewer, allowing me to see thumbnails of lots of pictures at once, create different folders to keep them in, etc. It is also a pretty good photo editor for cropping and adjusting color and size. It will easily convert photos from *.tiff or *.bmp format to *
21. Re: [TMG] Time lines and objectivity [1]
In a message dated 9/11/02 11:15:03 PM Central Daylight Time, iansinger@sympatico.ca writes: > Right, just what I was saying. If you are not sticking to facts, or as the > Prime Minister of Canada said along the lines of "a proof is a proof is a > proof and if it's a good proof you know it's a proof" the make sure that > the opinion words stand out as opinion. > > Ian Singer > > > Ian, If you used timelines in TMG, you would see that they are mainly for recording dates and events. While I guess
22. Re: [TMG] Printing surname in narrative report sentences (5.03) [1]
> > I have several reports in which I would like to refer to someone by surname > > only - without given name. > > > > I can't find a way of building a sentence to do this. Am I missing > > something? Maybe there's something undocumented in the variables Help > file. Thanks, Lee and Terry, for some good pointers. I'll be experimenting over the weekend. - David Murray -
23. [TMG] good suggestions!! for newbie [1]
Thank you to each of you that responded to my multiple marriage/sibling questions. Now, to go and implement the suggestions. My mother always told me, "Practice makes perfect". Shari
24. Re: [TMG] Semi-OT: "The Brain" [1]
Evelyn Hendricks wrote: > All I got when I went to that page was a blue screen. Down at the bottom > it said "document done," so I suppose it had finished loading. I use > Netscape. Which version of Netscape, Evelyn. I looked at it with Netscape 7.0 and it looked and worked fine for me. It is pretty cool, too! George -- Please visit these sites: Ballentine-Huxford Family History & Ballentine Branches Newsletter: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~ballentinebranches/ Sons of Confederate Ve
25. [TMG] Re: Scanners and resolution [1]
At 10:43 AM 9/22/2002 -0600, you wrote: >problem being read, I tell my scanning software to scan at 200% (or more >if it's small). I can always use photo software to shrink, but if your >first scan is too small to read, then you can't enlarge without >sacrificing detail. Example of what I mean - I just scanned a photo of a >picture approx 5x7. The result is more like 10x14. But I was able to make >out detail of one of the people in picture. That original scan can then be >used to make smaller individu
Viewing 1-25 of 2,594 matches from 36,222,914 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.489925