Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:tmg +(+date:sep +date:2003)
Viewing 1-25 of 1,179 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [TMG] Bug in sourcing tags [1]
Forgive me if this has already been reported, but I've found a bug in 5.09 that didn't exist in 5.08 To reproduce, chose a tag that has no citation. Double Click on the tag. Open the citation window Put in sureties for name and date, but not place. Close the citation window. If you exit the tag window now, everything will be fine. But instead of exiting, reopen the citation and put in a surety for place (for example). Now close the tag window and the citation disappears. You have to go back and re-ente
2. Re: [TMG] Family Group Sheets [1]
Which report gives you lists of families? Don't forget that for the LDS, collecting people into families is needed for the temple work. The FGS is their most important unit. On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 14:30, Karenhappu@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/9/2003 4:04:38 PM Central Daylight Time, > cheasa@bellsouth.net writes: > > > Well, I never thought to ask. I just assumed that everyone would > > want it and for some reason it wasn't doable. Never thought that I > > might be the only one who had
3. RE: [TMG] Fed up [1]
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:40, Bruce Evans wrote: > I'll give them a shot at it, but I'm not impressed with a company that > doesn't monitor its user forum. Evne Microsoft does better than that. You kidding? Microsoft won't give you the time of day unless you pay exorbitant support fees. From what I've heard from those who pay the support fees, that support is none too good, either. My experience with Intuit and McAfee has been terrible too, in Intuit's case, we even had paid the exorbitant fees. TMG has
4. Re: [TMG] Wholly Genes Newsletter, 30 August 2003 [1]
I read it on the web site, although the links to the article on the HP drivers, which are meaningful to me, were not working on the web site. On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 04:22, Bob Velke wrote: > Nancy Ranck said: > > > > The Table of contents has come through twice, but no newsletter. > > I sent the Table of Contents to this list once and I sent the whole > newsletter to your private e-mail box once. If the one that you received > privately is only a Table of Contents, then I can only guess that you ISP
5. Re: [TMG] Wholly Genes Newsletter, 30 August 2003 [1]
I think you mean http://www.whollygenes.com/imagedriver.htm Unfortunately, I deleted the TOC email. On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:42, Bob Velke wrote: > Gordon said: > > >I read it on the web site, although the links to the article on the HP > >drivers, which are meaningful to me, were not working on the web site. > > I see what you mean. Some of the URLs were stripped out when the text > version was converted to HTML. I'll look into why that happened but I've > fixed it now. > > The site in questi
6. Re: [TMG] YOU MAY HAVE A VIRUS FROM ME - URGENT [1]
You have been hornswoggled! This is a well known hoax, which you have been tricked into propagating onto this list. Virus warnings are banned from this list, for good reason. You have just deleted one of your legitimate Windows files. See: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/jdbgmgr.exe.file.hoax.html On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 02:30, Theresa Greene Reed wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: MedChi > To: legislative.medchi@starpower.net > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:21 AM > Subje
7. Re: [TMG] Wholly Genes Newsletter, 30 August 2003 [1]
Me too, and I didn't get it either. On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 08:20, Nancy Ranck wrote: > But I am a subscriber. > Nancy > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Delia Robertson" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 4:43 PM > Subject: Re: [TMG] Wholly Genes Newsletter, 30 August 2003 > > > > Nancy, > > > > Nancy Ranck wrote: > > > > > > The Table of contents has come through twice, but no newsletter. > > > Nancy Ranck > > > > > snip > > > > Following is the
8. Re: [TMG] Filter help, please [0.969239]
Thanks, but your suggestion still didn't seem to work: 1. any event any place field equals Ost Friesland and 2. any event DATE <= * 1717 and 3. Sex = M End * "does not come after" This filter still resulted in numerous folks with dates which start after 1717 and are in some way qualified. It also includes people based on a qualified (circa, before etc.) sort date when the primary date f
9. [TMG] File in use solution [0.969239]
Jeff, Thank you so much. Deleting all of the *.CDX files in the project folder, solved it entirely. I am particularly grateful for your speedy response, as the lost data set is rather special. Tomorrow we are visiting a lady aged 96 who has memories of living with her grandmother's family before and during the first world war. I used censuses etc to put together a data set of the people in the London street when she was born - her grandparents, uncles, aunts etc, with another gt grandmother nextdo
10. Re: [TMG] Problem with sentence in education tag [0.969239]
Thanks! I'm embarrassed. Can you tell I'm new at this? ----- Original Message ----- From: "William M Roberts" To: Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 8:29 PM Subject: RE: [TMG] Problem with sentence in education tag > Valorie > > Assign the role of Student to the person that you wish to have the > sentence associated with the student role. > > Myrnice > > Valorie wrote on Sunday, September 14, 2003 6:06 PM > > To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com > > Subject: [TMG] Problem w
11. Re: [TMG] What's going on with this Grey Out Business [0.969239]
I'm sorry, but not being able to find the cause of a major bug such as this one is a cop out used by companies who do not wish to allocate the resources to fixing a known bug (can u say FTM). This is a problem frequently reproducible by apparently many users (myself included). If companies who produce software for corporate clients take this attitude then they soon go bankrupt from losing clients. Unfortunately, companies who produce software for individual consumers have the luxury of ignoring bugs which a
12. RE: [TMG] Definition - Unique Endnote [0.969239]
Thank you Jeff, Terry and Elizabeth, you've helped to clarify the two concepts. Polly Held phheld@twcny.rr.com -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Milner [mailto:jmilner@nu-z.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:39 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [TMG] Definition - Unique Endnote Elizabeth Churchett wrote: > Polly, > > The Help file ("Report Options: Sources") states the following: > > Check Unique if you want footnotes/endnotes to print each source only > once. (There will be no short
13. RE: [TMG] CD - Ver 5.09 [0.969239]
You should be able to begin the CD with - or -- to suppress it. Richard Damon -- rbrdamon@rcn,.com (Home) rdamon@beltronicsinc.com (Work) richard@damon.name (Genealogy) -----Original Message----- From: Garry F Bell [mailto:garryfbell@clear.net.nz] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:27 PM To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [TMG] CD - Ver 5.09 Is there any way one can exclude CDs from printing? I have an instance where there is an event with three distinct sources to which I want to add, to each, a shor
14. Re: [TMG] Help [0.969239]
Bruce Evans wrote: > > Go into his or her display, right click on the marriage tag and delete it. > TMG will ask you if you want to disolve the marriage connection. Reply, yes, > and it's looked after. The father will still be connected to the mother but > without a marriage date and the son will still follow. > The father will be connected to the son and the mother will be connected to the mother but not to each other. TMG does not connect people through a family but connects directly. There is a Mothe
15. RE: [TMG] Singular v Plural in Role Sentences [0.969239]
[R:sons] in the sentence for Role=sons will list only that person. [RF:sons] (or any of the other variants) will list all of the people in this role. When you wrote "[R:sons] were" you were thinking that you would get multiple subjects, and thus the plural was correct, actually you get only the current so you need a singular verb. Since [W] can be used to get just the current person, I wish that [R:role] would always list all of the people with that role. Others are used to always referring to people by the
16. Re: [TMG] OT Early Sources and Surety Values [0.969239]
Bobbie, Thanks for your thoughts, it was very helpful and pretty much reflected my concerns with sourcing in these publications. As I'm reading this, it occurs to me that it might be a great Off Topic discussion, so I'll move it to OT and get it started. You say that you would assign a 2 to Torrey but only a 1 to Banks and Savage. It would be interesting to hear from others about what surety they would consider assigning to these and others of the old "Tried and True", well known genealogical publicatio
17. RE: [TMG] Focus group [0.969239]
Thanks Terry I just realized that and sent an update. Myrnice Terry Reigel [mailto:terry@reigelridge.com] > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:33 PM > To: TMG-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: RE: [TMG] Focus group > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:15:17 -0400, William M Roberts wrote: > > > Create a filter for the Family Group Sheet Report as > > follows: > > > > > > # of children > is greater than 0 OR > > ( Sex = Equals M AND > > Father* ID # is 0 AND
18. RE: [TMG] more questions re name styles [0.969239]
You can also use the Name-other field for the ages (just discovered it too late to be of any use to my research.) I do what you say about changing the name preference and it works fine. John's utility will also change the name styles too, so what I do before I run a report is have it find all the NAME-1850 name tags, and change their name styles to NAME-1850 name style. Just remember that you will lose your annotations when the next upgrade comes out if it updates the help files. Teresa Ghee Elliott For ex
19. Re: [TMG] Source Abbreviations [0.969239]
Teresa, > Do you know if any of the others have changed? The repository abbreviation hasn't changed but it's 50 just like the source abbreviation. I doubt that any of the others have changed but don't know for sure. Jim
20. RE: [TMG] TMG v5.09 Gray Outs -revisited [0.969239]
Patty, Could be, but the fan does help with the overheating, and I do notice that TMG runs faster with the fan on. The reason that they changed the BIOS was it controls the fan settings and that allows the internal fan to cut on sooner. It is just one more thing to check on if you are having problems with TMG. I might add that I have never seen the gray out problem with TMG on this machine nor has it crashed since we got it back from the factory even without the fan, so hopefully the problems I had initi
21. Re: [TMG] Sources & Repositories [0.969239]
Lee, I told yhou I was confused! Sorry about changing horses in mid stream (?) i.e. Deed and Tax. You see to me Publisher means as in the publisher of a book--I'm not thinking of Repository--though I'm sure I tried that too. Then Manuscript Info is a element too. What I seem to find often is that the Source Elements that often come up don't seem to match what it shows in the book. I'll try again. Usually not so dense. Thanks again Pauline Ballentine ----- Original Message ----- From: "L
22. RE: [TMG] another filter problem [0.969239]
Thanks to Astrid & Theresa for setting me straight on this. Even after you told me what to do, I was sitting here staring at the list of choices under Subfield, trying to figure out what on earth you were talking about, when it occurred to me to look under Field. Now everthing works nicely, except for the problem I have with undated tags. Oh well, I guess everything can't be automated and I will have to do a little work. Thanks again. Cheryl -----Original Message----- From: Astrid Kranzbuhler [mailto:k
23. Re: [TMG] Comments in source output form not updating, 5.09 [0.969239]
Hi Michael, I reported this to Wholly Genes the week before last. I did fully check it out before reporting, and I had no experience of data loss--i.e., the new text I'd typed in the Comments field was retained, it just wasn't updated wherever it needed to be for the output preview. When I'd exited the Tag and then re-entered, my changes were still present in every case and the output preview worked. Hopefully it will be fixed in the next release, it's probably something small . . . --Elizabeth
24. Re: [TMG] OT: Gensmarts [0.969239]
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 09:08:32PM -0400, David S. Flower wrote: > Is there a list server for GenSmarts? Have you gone to their online forum? http://www.gensmarts.com/forum/ andy -- Andy Davidson pheon@hevanet.com If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything.
25. Re: [TMG] Help [0.969239]
Jack, TMG doesn't *assume* a marriage, you have to tell it that a pair married in some way. In what way is it showing a marriage? Is there a marriage tag? If so, delete that tag. If that's not it, then where are you seeing a marriage? In a particular report? Cheers, Bobbie Hall Chicago ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack" To: Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 5:51 PM Subject: [TMG] Help > I have a female who had a son, but she was not married, and neve
Viewing 1-25 of 1,179 matches from 36,018,260 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.559914