Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:usgenweb-all
Viewing 1-25 of 29,239 matches from 36,076,105 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next
1. [ALL-L] June 9, 2003 Status Report - Nominations [1]
To All USGenWeb Members - As of this morning, June 9, 2003, the Election Committee has received a total of 110 nominations since the nomination period opened, June 2, 2003. Nominee names and status during processing are located here: http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/nominee.htm The nominee pages are updated frequently, usually at least twice a day. The nomination period will continue until Monday June 16, 2003, 8:00 am EST (7:00 am CT). Nominations submitted after that date/time will not be acc
2. [ALL-L] USGenWeb Election - Last day for Nominations [1]
*Permission granted to forward to all USGenWeb Members and appropriate lists. This is a reminder that the USGenWeb Election Committee will cease taking nominations for the National 2003 Election, on Monday, June 16, 2003 8 AM ET, 7 AM CT. As of this writing, the EC has received a total of 128 nominations. There is at least one candidate for every open position. Check the Election Committee Nationals 2003 web pages for a list of nominees and candidates, as well as general information about open posi
3. [ALL-L] USGenWeb National Election Begins [1]
To All USGenWeb Members - Voting for the USGenWeb National Election 2003 begins Tuesday, July 1, 2003 8:00 am CST and will end July 31, 2003 11:59 pm CST. Any votes cast before and after that time will not be counted. The first batch of Passwords have been sent out, and others will follow over the next day or two. If you do not receive a password by the 4th or 5th, please contact the Election Committee. When you receive your password, please PRINT IT OUT OR OTHERWISE SAVE IT. To vote, go to https
4. [ALL-L] Bylaws Revision -- News / Status [1]
(**Please forward to all appropriate project lists**) The Bylaws Revision Committee (BRC) has again experienced attrition of its membership. There are currently 8 committee members including the NC (ex-officio). The remaining members have consented to a Recess in order to seek volunteers to bring the membership back to at least 10 or preferably 12 members. It is encouraging to see so many project members accept nominations to run for office and a record number of members nominated. Please consider volunte
5. [ALL-L] USGenWeb National Election 2003 Announcement [1]
To all USGenWeb Members: This is an Announce-only mailing. Please do not reply. You are receiving this Announcement because you are a member of the USGenWeb Project. If you are no longer a Project member, please contact the USGenWeb Election Committee immediately via Marti Graham . Monday, June 2, 2003, 8:00 am ET, nominations will open for the available positions on the USGenWeb Advisory Board. Nominations will continue for two weeks, and will cease June 16, 2003, 8:00 am ET. No
6. [ALL-L] Bylaws Revision -- News [1]
(**Please forward to all appropriate project lists**) The Bylaws Revision Committee (BRC) has completed a first draft of (old section 2) Section 3 of Article VIII Guidelines/Standards for Websites/Members. Section 3. Solicitation of funds on a USGenWeb affiliated web site is prohibited. It is permissible, however, to provide a link to a non-USGenWeb affiliated personal web site where genealogical services or materials are offered for sale. It is also permissible to acknowledge any entities who host or p
7. [ALL-L] USGenWeb National Election - Voting Information [1]
To all USGenWeb Members: This is an Announce-only mailing. Please do not reply. You are receiving this Announcement because you are a member of the USGenWeb Project. If you are no longer a Project member, please contact the USGenWeb Election Committee immediately via Marti Graham . Nominations are now complete for the USGenWeb National Election 2003. A list of candidates with links to available campaign pages may be found on The Election Committee National Election 2003 web page:
8. [ABChat] Appointment of USGenWeb Project Assistant Webmaster [1]
I would like to open up discussion regaring the best process of accomplish -- Appointment of USGenWeb Project Assistant Webmaster with input of Web Manager, Jeff Kemp. Tina
9. [ABChat] Duplicate and Old messages from BOARD [1]
Is anyone else getting a smattering of old board messages today - some of them duplicates and some that had never come before? (I can see Annie is.) They are from mid to late November.
10. [ABChat] Grievance Committee Calls for Mediators and Arbitrators [1]
Please feel free to share with Project lists. Tina Vickery National Coordinator USGenWeb Project --- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dorman Holub"
11. Re: [ABChat] Appointment of USGenWeb Project Assistant Webmaster [1]
Sounds like a solid plan to me. Concetta On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Tina S. Vickery wrote: > Jeff is subbed to this list in read-only mode. I would like to ask him to > write the Board (Mike and/or I) with his recommendations to be shared > privately with the rest of the Board as it is a personnel matter. How does > that sound to everyone? > > Tina > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "SEMA CC" > To: > Sent: Thursday, Dece
12. Re: [ABChat] Duplicate and Old messages from BOARD [1]
I just noticed a few, was about to ask if it was just me or if Rootsweb is coughing up some oldies. Alice *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 12/9/2008 at 1:38 PM mike@saintclair.org wrote: >Is anyone else getting a smattering of old board messages today - some >of them duplicates and some that had never come before? (I can see >Annie is.) They are from mid to late November. >
13. Re: [ABChat] Duplicate and Old messages from BOARD [1]
I believe someone at TGN flushed and cleaned out Al Gore's internet tubes. Scott ________________________________ From: SEMA CC To: usgenweb-all@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:08:45 PM Subject: Re: [ABChat] Duplicate and Old messages from BOARD Yes, I have been also. Denise -----Original Message----- From: usgenweb-all-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:usgenweb-all-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mike St. Clair/ST Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:39 PM To: usg
14. Re: [ABChat] Duplicate and Old messages from BOARD [1]
Yes, I have been also. Denise -----Original Message----- From: usgenweb-all-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:usgenweb-all-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mike St. Clair/ST Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:39 PM To: usgenweb-all@rootsweb.com Subject: [ABChat] Duplicate and Old messages from BOARD Is anyone else getting a smattering of old board messages today - some of them duplicates and some that had never come before? (I can see Annie is.) They are from mid to late November. ------------------
15. Re: [ABChat] Appointment of USGenWeb Project Assistant Webmaster [1]
Does Jeff have anyone in mind that he would like to put before the AB? Is he subbed to this list? Just wondering. Denise -----Original Message----- From: usgenweb-all-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:usgenweb-all-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 5:07 PM To: usgenweb-all@rootsweb.com Subject: [ABChat] Appointment of USGenWeb Project Assistant Webmaster I would like to open up discussion regaring the best process of accomplish -- Appointment of USGenWeb
16. Re: [ABChat] Appointment of USGenWeb Project Assistant Webmaster [1]
Jeff is subbed to this list in read-only mode. I would like to ask him to write the Board (Mike and/or I) with his recommendations to be shared privately with the rest of the Board as it is a personnel matter. How does that sound to everyone? Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "SEMA CC" To: Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 9:24 PM Subject: Re: [ABChat] Appointment of USGenWeb Project Assistant Webmaster > Does Jeff have anyone in mind that he
17. city & town coordinators / help from historical societies [1]
I have received help, and offers for help I haven't taken up yet, from the historical societies of both my counties. They have both given me permission to use historical books put out by them as well as burial records. I can have access to many more records held by the societies when I can get off my rear and do something with them. They all seem very eager to get the info on the web and are even more eager that someone is willing to do it (esp. for free!) They must think I'm a c
18. Re: Copyright and LDS films [1]
Betteye, I don't mind at all. I should have included documents generated by governmental or private entities in foreign countries will be covered by copyright laws of their own countries, and treaties...and who knows what all else so... Renee L. Dauven, Clackamas Co, OR Betteye Bolden wrote: > > Thank you Renee for your most intelligent comment, and I will go back to > LDS and ask > them to be more specific. Do you mind if I print your letter and present > this to them? > bbolden@voyager.net > -------
19. Re: WEB: Some excellent thoughts on incorporation [1]
I have to agree with Dr. Leverich on the incorporation issue. That doesn't mean I would ever leave the project. It just seems to make sense to me. Best regards, Jeff Martin, jmartin@arthur.avalon.net Crawford County Missouri Web Page http://www.avalon.net/~jmartin/Crawford Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri Page http://www.avalon.net/~jmartin/Ste.Genevieve ------------------------------
20. Re: Who's here? [1]
Ruth Huggler wrote: > > Boy, do I feel like an outsider. Is this a chat line? > > I'm just a lowly county coordinator who subbed, dutifully, at the suggestion > of my state coordinator. This isn't what I expected... My "In" box is > already full enough of junk mail! :) I imagine that it does feel that way. Bear with us for a moment, Ruth and eventually, I hope, the discussion will shift away from another list to this one where perhaps it is more useful. It will just take awhile, I think, before ev
21. Re: HTML Copyright Issues [1]
> > The author of HTML pages, unless doing so in the paid employment of an > > organization, holds the copyright to all HTML source code. > > "HTML source code" is not a term. It is a misleading and dangerous > phrase. HTML is a markup language, not a programming language. HTML > in a web page is no more copyright protected than the bold type used > in an office memo. Before this gets out of hand here, may I suggest that if anyone is interested in researching this issue, the HTML Writers Guild Websit
22. Re: Copyright and the LDS microfilms [1]
John C. Rigdon wrote: > > I don't mean to take on the LDS church on the matter of copyrights, > but the copyright law is quite clear on this point. > > Once an item goes into the public domain, it cannot be copyrighted > again by another entity. Mere possession of an item does not bestow > any copyright in the item. Thus, if I own a book, the only way I can > keep you from copying it is to not allow you access to it. (That's an > altogether different issue which we periodically face with possessive > lo
23. stuff to talk about [1]
At 11:40 PM 11/20/96 -0800, you wrote: ><> > >Mike.. here's another one. :) Let's get more discussions on this list. > >Now. .. what does everyone want to talk about? > >Linda Okay, I'll bite. I can get 195+ messages on certain other subjects from the other usgenweb list. Here's what I would like to discuss: Links. I noticed and loved the idea on the Estill County, KY (usgenweb page of a week) where Jennifer Elam put links to othe
24. Re: I*ncorporation Discussion [1]
-- Your message was: (from "Linda Russell Lewis") > Judy asked: > > << This was the one question I have been trying to find out -- is the > USGenWeb going after the nonprofit one or the profit incorporation? >> > > NON-profit!! > > Linda ------------------ I think folks often, and mistakenly, equate "nonprofit" with "good" and "for-profit" as "exploit the consumer". Remember, nonprofits can pay their employees arbitrarily high salaries and behave in other asocial manners -- there's nothing intrin
25. Stop Senseless Messages! [1]
I don't know about all of you, but I believe most would agree that these dumb messages, intended only for one person, such as the relentless stream of responses to the "Who's here? " message, are really very annoying. So unless the information is of interest to everyone on the list, let's please not send the message to everyone. I am new to this, and am very surprised at how much useless information I am receiving. I am wondering why I even bother with subscribing. Phew. Now I feel better. ------------
Viewing 1-25 of 29,239 matches from 36,076,105 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.339948