Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:usgenweb-sw +(+date:jul +date:2002)
Viewing 1-25 of 48 matches from 36,139,518 documents1 2 | Next
1. [USGenWeb-SW] Questions candidates [1]
Linda asked her questions and I enjoyed reading the answers. All seem to agree that closed sessions should be used only for sensitive or confidential matters. Like Linda, I would appreciate your answers to some questions I have dealing with closed sessions. Any candidate that feels like it may answer, I hope that all of you consider doing so. 1.) Do you believe the AB can be in both closed session and open session at the same time? 2.) Do you believe there should be a vote before the AB goes from open s
2. [USGenWeb-SW] Questions candidates [1]
I'm sorry, but question #5 below was misnumbered as question #4. Don Linda asked her questions and I enjoyed reading the answers. All seem to agree that closed sessions should be used only for sensitive or confidential matters. Like Linda, I would appreciate your answers to some questions I have dealing with closed sessions. Any candidate that feels like it may answer, I hope that all of you consider doing so. 1.) Do you believe the AB can be in both closed session and open session at the same time? 2
3. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Petition [1]
Don Wrote: | I would call attention to those in the SW/SC region that read the petition | to look at those signatures and reflect on what a large number of them have | done or have tried to do that was detrimental to this project. You can then | determine if they have the good of the organization as their motive or if | they have payback in their minds Evening Don: Just one quick comment on your statement. My name is on that petition and I find your comment extremely offensive. I spot many names on the Pe
4. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] FW: [ALL-L] Petition [1]
At 12:49 PM 7/24/2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 10:48 AM 7/24/02 -0500, you wrote: >>I did not accuse everyone on that list of being beyond investigation. But, >>I do believe if you examine it you also see many names of people that have >>a vendetta against Teresa because she has held their actions up to >>inspection. > >Hi again Don, > >I'm not sure what you mean by vendetta. But this accusation seems relevant >to me only if you mean that there are people who signed this petition who >would not have signed s
5. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] FW: [ALL-L] Petition [1]
At 10:48 AM 7/24/02 -0500, you wrote: >I did not accuse everyone on that list of being beyond investigation. But, >I do believe if you examine it you also see many names of people that have >a vendetta against Teresa because she has held their actions up to >inspection. Hi again Don, I'm not sure what you mean by vendetta. But this accusation seems relevant to me only if you mean that there are people who signed this petition who would not have signed such a petition if the offender had been some other
6. [USGenWeb-SW] USGenWeb Election [1]
If you are an archivist, a volunteer with the Tombstone Project, or a county coordinator, and have been since the last day of May 2002, you are eligible to vote in this election. If you have not received your password, please write to usgenwebec@mindspring.com You can also register your name and e-mail with the election committee by going to http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/ This is not required, you do not have to register in order to vote, but it would sure help the election committee. We have
7. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Petition [1]
I first composed a long message in answer to yours, but reviewing it, it turned out to be the same old, same old. So I will say only this. I would agree with you that the SW/SC list shouldn't be cluttered up with this stuff, but then I believe the trend started with the posting of the URL for the petition on the SW/SC list. That information should never have appeared on the list and certainly not posted by AB members. The posting of the URL was politically motivated by opponents of Teresa that happen to b
8. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Important FYI [1]
When I visit the USGENWEB ELECTION site http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/2002nominations.html from the information posted to the site it *Appears* that Lindquist neither accepted nor declined her nomination for NC. It appears that there was a two week time span for her to respond and that she never did. That indicates to me that she is not very responsive to matters of the Project.......... I have signed the petition in hopes that enough signatures can be gathered to initiate a recall vote- I hav
9. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Linda's Questions ... with answers [1]
Scott I certainly appreciate you taking the time to answer my questions. Your answers were very informative and well thought out. Thank you very much. Linda homepage: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas MarionCoAR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ TulsaCoOK: http://www.rootsweb.com/~oktulsa2 MuskogeeCoOk: http://www.rootsweb.com/~okmuskog SurnameLists: H.A.A.S/H.A.S.S. L.E.W.A.L.L.E.N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Burow" To: Sent: Friday, Ju
10. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Linda's Questions [1]
Thank you Phyllis. I certainly appreciate you taking the time to answer my questions. Linda homepage: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas MarionCoAR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ TulsaCoOK: http://www.rootsweb.com/~oktulsa2 MuskogeeCoOk: http://www.rootsweb.com/~okmuskog SurnameLists: H.A.A.S/H.A.S.S. L.E.W.A.L.L.E.N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phyllis Rippee" To: Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 3:01 PM Subject: [USGenWeb-SW] Linda's Questions
11. [USGenWeb-SW] Important FYI [1]
http://www.giddeon.com/usgenweb/petition.html This petition has been drawn up by Keith Giddeon, to require the USGenWeb Project Advisory Board to initiate a recall vote in regards to the Representative-At-Large, Teresa Lindquist. The Advisory Board has declared Ms. Lindquist "a member not in good standing." Pending an appeal from Ms. Lindquist, or enough signatures on the above petition, the Advisory Board cannot take further action. This announcement in no way reflects the opinion of your Advisory Boar
12. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Petition [1]
Not a problem Kathy, thanks for your response. Haven't I been led to believe that Einstein had a problem with high school math? Don At 05:53 PM 7/27/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Don, > I am not joking when I tell you this, I flunked math every year in >school, I wouldn't even begin to attempt to try to figure this problem out. >And trust me you wouldn't want me to. I personally have learned to accept >this and gone on with my life. Now if you wanted me to design and make a >quilt, sew clothing, draw pictur
13. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Important FYI [1]
Teresa was the only candidate who did not respond at all. All of the other candidates did. Linda homepage: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas MarionCoAR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ TulsaCoOK: http://www.rootsweb.com/~oktulsa2 MuskogeeCoOk: http://www.rootsweb.com/~okmuskog SurnameLists: H.A.A.S/H.A.S.S. L.E.W.A.L.L.E.N ----- Original Message ----- From: "carolyn" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:31 PM Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Important
14. [USGenWeb-SW] Opening of Election [1]
Ladies and Gentlemen: The annual USGenWeb Election opens today at 10:00 am CT. Passwords and voting instructions will be mailed this morning. If anyone does not get their announce only e-mail by tomorrow please notify the Election Committee: usgenwebec@mindspring.com Please stop by the Election Committee's Web site (http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/) and visit the Candidate's campaign pages. The Election will run the month of July so you have plenty of time to acquaint yourself with the Election iss
15. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Candidate Questions- Response [1]
Thank you Roger I appreciate your answers very much. Linda homepage: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas MarionCoAR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ TulsaCoOK: http://www.rootsweb.com/~oktulsa2 MuskogeeCoOk: http://www.rootsweb.com/~okmuskog SurnameLists: H.A.A.S/H.A.S.S. L.E.W.A.L.L.E.N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Swafford" To: Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 12:47 PM Subject: [USGenWeb-SW] Candidate Questions- Response | Comments below
16. [USGenWeb-SW] Election announcement [1]
Ladies and Gentlemen: Two quick items. The server that is hosting our election will be unavailable the largest part of Sunday July 28th while the University upgrades their electrical system. And, a reminder that the USGenWeb Project's Annual Election will be over Wed July 31st at 7:00 p.m. CT. If you have not yet voted the EC encourages you to take this opportunity to exercise your right of choice. The USGenWeb Election Committee Election Committee's web site: http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/
17. [USGenWeb-SW] No Password [1]
Sandra your e-mail bounced. Passwords on bounces will be resent on Monday. Linda Davenport Ec ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandra Kornegay Rhodes" To: Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:49 PM Subject: PML Search Result matching Haas | ===================================================================== | A result of your requested PML search. To refine or cancel this | search, please visit http://pml.rootsweb.com/ | ==================================
18. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Petition [1]
7At 01:11 AM 7/27/02 -0500, you wrote: >Very well, it is past history, but here are some names appearing on the >petition that in my opinion have been a detriment to the project. Morning, Don, I was left almost speechless by this posting. Almost. >The only thing I dislike about Teresa is that she makes us think. That's certainly nothing to dislike, but in some ways I agree with you that Teresa makes me think. It's like
19. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] FW: [ALL-L] Petition [1]
At 01:24 PM 7/24/02 -0500, you wrote: >I'll tell you this, I never saw the petition until it was a done deal and >it appeared on the SW/SC list with 48 names already on it. Where was it >openly circulated to the membership before it appeared on the regional >lists? Now if that wasn't pre-planned I don't know what would be. If that >doesn't indicate a vendetta I don't know how to describe one. Don, The URL was posted to the ALL-list on Tuesday evening (not by an AB member). I clicked on the URL, and ther
20. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] FW: [ALL-L] Petition [1]
Phyllis Rippie wrote This announcement in no way reflects the opinion of your Advisory Board Representatives. It is merely to acquaint you with what is being done by your fellow Project Members And, I write, that the petition in no way reflects the bylaws of this organization. It is vigilante action plain and simple and in no way is supported by any section of our bylaws. Now we have two members of the AB Jana and Phyllis that represent us here in the SW/SC region that are condoning a vigilante petitio
21. [USGenWeb-SW] Mail list [1]
Are the mail lists up and running? Can't send messages on some?
22. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] FW: [ALL-L] Petition [1]
At 08:47 AM 7/24/2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 07:47 AM 7/24/02 -0500, you wrote: >>I would call attention to those in the SW/SC region that read the petition >>to look at those signatures and reflect on what a large number of them have >>done or have tried to do that was detrimental to this project. You can then >>determine if they have the good of the organization as their motive or if >>they have payback in their minds. >> > >Hi Don, > >Thanks for sharing your opinion. Mine is about 180 degrees from this.
23. [USGenWeb-SW] Linda's Questions [1]
1, Do you believe that all of the AB's business should be conducted in open session and that Board-Exec should never be used? No. There are times when confidentiality is necessary to prevent embarassment of Project members; or when what is being discussed could possibly be detrimental to the Project. Grievances and personnel issues are the most common problems discussed in closed sessions. 2. Do you believe that Teresa's posting of the e-mail messages of Board-Exec was within the scope of the bylaws?
24. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] FW: [ALL-L] Petition [1]
At 07:47 AM 7/24/02 -0500, you wrote: >I would call attention to those in the SW/SC region that read the petition >to look at those signatures and reflect on what a large number of them have >done or have tried to do that was detrimental to this project. You can then >determine if they have the good of the organization as their motive or if >they have payback in their minds. > Hi Don, Thanks for sharing your opinion. Mine is about 180 degrees from this. When I look at the names on this petition (http:/
25. [USGenWeb-SW] FW: [ALL-L] Petition [1]
FYI Jana Black -----Original Message----- From: Keith Giddeon [mailto:keith@giddeon.com] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:06 PM To: USGENWEB-ALL-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [ALL-L] Petition http://www.giddeon.com/usgenweb/petition.html Feel free to post this anywhere. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/02 ==== USGENWEB-ALL Mailing List ==== The USGenWeb Project is not a commercial
Viewing 1-25 of 48 matches from 36,139,518 documents1 2 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.649901