Archives Search Engine

Body:
Subject:
From:
(email address of poster)
List:
(limit search to one mailing list)
Date:
(e.g. 10 Jun 2005, Jun 2005, or 2005)
   Search tips

Searching for: +path:usgenweb-sw +(+date:jun +date:2004)
Viewing 1-25 of 202 matches from 36,110,418 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next
1. Election Time [1]
The USGenWeb election process has started up -- on 01 June Nominations for elective offices can be made by any of you who wish to do so, (you can even nominate yourself). However, you can ony vote on the nominees if you are a volunteer in that region. Regional Divisions can be found here: http://www.usgenweb.org/about/regions.html Deadline for submitting nominations is June 14, 8 am EST The actual election begins July 1. You should get a message with your voting password and the URL to vote around 01 J
2. RE: [USGenWeb-SW] [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 04-14 [1]
*-----Original Message----- *From: bookstorelady [mailto:bookstorelady@prodigy.net] *Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 6:29 PM *To: USGENWEB-SW-L@rootsweb.com *Subject: RE: [USGenWeb-SW] [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 04-14 * snip *I raised 3 daughters and a son *and survived the 60's. I have 6 operating braincells and they *are currently busy on that breathing thing... Darilee, Thanks for the belly laugh. I needed that today . Shari
3. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Elections [1]
> To keep abreast of the candidates during the nomination period, visit the > EC Meet The Candidates web page: > > http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/national-2004/meet.htm Looks like I listed them all Thanks Ellen Bettie <>< -- Little known TX fact Beaumont to El Paso: 742 miles - Beaumont to Chicago: 770 miles
4. Re: [BOARD-L] RESULTS: Motion 04-13-D [1]
Here's the latest from AB > With 9 members voting YES and 6 members not voting, the motion passes. > > So far the AB has determined to return the proposed bylaws to the Bylaws > Revision Committee. The AB has determined that sponsorship by the states is > not necessary for the revisions, that the revisions will be presented for a > vote of the members by special election, no less than 60 days before 2005 > election cycle, and that the proposed revisions be reworked in such a way > that they can be presente
5. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Elections [1]
To keep abreast of the candidates during the nomination period, visit the EC Meet The Candidates web page: http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/national-2004/meet.htm Thanks, Ellen Pack EC At 06:16 PM 6/12/2004 -0500, you wrote: > > > How would you all like me to invite all the candidates to a > > > question & answer session on this list? > >So far the candidates are, (or might be) > >The SWSC CC rep candidates: >David Morgan >Mike St. Clair >Phyllis Rippee > >The SWSC SC rep candidates are: >SC rep >
6. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Amendment to Motion 04-13-D [1]
Bettie said: Yes Bettie has a big mouth (no comments David!! Well, Bettie's "big mouth" is doing a wonderful job of keeping all of you informed on the 'goings-on' . I personally use this list to "hear" the comments of many of you before casting my vote on issues before the AB. Thanks, Bettie, for the great job you're doing on this list! If any of you have questions of me, I'll try my best to answer them. Larry Flesher > >
7. Questions for the NC candidates and SW-SC Region candidates. [1]
Questions to candidates for national office who would represent my interest if elected. That is National Coordinator Charles Barnum, Shari Handley, Don Kelly, Karen Mitchell, Richard White State Coordinator Representative Larry Flesher County Coordinator Representative David Morgan, Mike St. Clair, Phyllis Rippee My questions are found at the bottom of this message. Sorry, the message is rather lengthy, but I feel everyone should know what I find of concern if they are to evaluate your answers. Extract
8. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] USGenWeb archives [1]
Looks good. Have you considered providing some guidance right at the submission page about how to get a good, usable photo of a gravestone. Things like distance, angle, light angle, etc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Kelly" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] USGenWeb archives > In it's infant stage, but sufficient example to indicate potential. > > http://www.rootsweb.com/~cofremon/GPP.htm > > On the intro p
9. FYI [1]
Hi all We are back sooner than expected from our vacation/second honeymoon, & I see that my "vacation message" didn't come through on some lists so you may not even know we were gone There were some storms that came through & caused some damage. It appears to have "gotten" hunny man's computer too. Ouch!! At any rate, it's good to be home Bettie <><
10. RE: [USGenWeb-SW] Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 14C [1]
Already did my time, thanks, but no thanks! Jana -----Original Message----- From: Bosque Lover [mailto:nana321@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:46 PM To: USGENWEB-SW-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 14C Does this also mean I can volunteer you two for the BRC if needed??? hehehehe Bettie <>< > Me too! Jana > > -----Original Message----- > From: Elaine Martin [mailto:McStumped@cox-internet.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:15 PM > To: USGENWEB-SW-L
11. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Motion Results 13C & 14-D Discussion [1]
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Bosque Lover wrote: > > It is my understanding the 5 states can co-sponsor as many amendments > > as they choose. > > Probably so--that would seem logical too. > Even so, in this case, ALL the bylaws have served a considerable amount of time & > it has become necessary to amend/revise/update portions of them. If the CCs have > to "live" by these in USGW Project, then why shouldn't the all the CCs be allowed > to vote on each amendment? Especially when the vast majority have been sta
12. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Special Projects- Copyright [1]
That is why the USGW Archives changed the copyright notice to the current one so no one have to re-type the copyright notice into each file. W. David Samuelsen Original Message: ----------------- From: Don Kelly donkelly@grovenet.net Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:16:46 -0700 To: USGENWEB-SW-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Special Projects- Copyright Not silly at all Jeff. It is an eight year old bylaw faced with 2004 reality. The most obvious need indicated by real time is periodic review when o
13. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 14C [1]
This time I hhope they have the power to accept input from the membership and make NEEDED changes. Last time it seemed that the revisions were prewritten, publicised, and cast in stone. -- `` Jeffery G. Scism. IBSSG Genealogy is the art of the living haunting the dead, If we persist perhaps they will become annoyed and tell us what REALLY happened. ~~~~
14. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Questions for the NC candidates and SW-SC Region candidates. [1]
How far is it from Texas to the North Pole? DonK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bosque Lover" To: Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Questions for the NC candidates and SW-SC Region candidates. > There are only 2 NC candidates that are not subscribed & I have sent Don Tharp's > question to them, along with the URL for our list archives so they can view any > questions I miss sending and/or to view the answers. I will
15. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 04-14 [1]
Harold there has NOT been 2/3 of any group file complaints. And I would like to ask if someone was threatening you or the other members of this list. Do you really think you or I would not hear about it big time. I have much more faith in most CCs. Richard... Harold Kilmer wrote: > Thanks for some input on this problem David. I was not aware that Georgia > CCs had had two thirds of the CCs file a complaint and it had not been > recognized by the NC. > _____________________________________ > Harol
16. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Great-great Grandpa willed me his papers [1]
Impressive by any standard. I wish my gggfather Hiram Kelly had left such records. He was Methodist born in Burke County, NC; moved with a young family to Habersham County, GA; moved in his later years with second wife and three daughters to Madison County, AR He certainly had a foot itch for new lands and new adventures. Don Kelly ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Scism" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Gr
17. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] answer to Harold [1]
Hi Betty What I had attempted to do in a very early email was to correct inaccuracies that I saw in an email. At the same time I wanted to give more history... which, of course, just confused things because I didn't even try to do an indepth time line. I have heard a lot of rumors about the Georgia situation and I felt I could give some solid information. Rumors... 2/3rds of the CC's were in open revolt and 2/3rds of the CC's left Georgia in anger. My very quick survey of CC's was
18. USGenWeb archives [1]
I read the statements from Charles Barnum. I am not running for any office, nor do I ever intend to. I have never since 1998, when I came into this project, been pushed into submitting even one file to the archives. I do place records in the Archives because I realize how important it is to have them there. I CC Butler county MO., I maintain the county site as a county site where the information is gathered and remains on the site. I also maintain the archives for this site and I try to make sure the
19. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] USGenWeb archives [1]
Another thought, with the prevalence of GPS units now days perhaps coordinates should be gathered when possible, at least a gps can get you within 10-50 feet of the target point. Handy for grave sites and parking places. -- ~~ Jeffery G. Scism. IBSSG Genealogy is the art convincing public officials that you need to have a document to determine IF you are a descendant, and if you had Proof of descendancy, you wouldn't NEED the document.
20. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Candidates [1]
Hi .. I was goin' to send this to list... but figured it would get ME banned but since I worked so hard at it... Darilee... you said... "Little known TX fact Beaumont to El Paso: 742 miles - Beaumont to Chicago: 770 miles" I say.... Paris to Berlin 665 miles - Paris to Madrid 787 Of course Germany has the autobahn and unlimited speed.... oh...wait... no one is rural Texas knows what an intact speed limit sign is... and they drive with the Lord at their side and a bottle of beer in their lap.
21. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] how far is Texas from the North Pole? [1]
Any direction excluding down or up.....technically south is the only direction you can point. Again, the number of steps depends on the length of your stride, but close enough; I will buy the math.. Don ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Scism" To: Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 3:25 PM Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] how far is Texas from the North Pole? > No NOT 8, Using a single step as a unit, the formula for a > circumference is pi x D Since
22. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] USGenWeb archives [1]
Part one when a photo is submitted, you get an email. You go to the photo submissions page and click on admin, enter your password, then the submitted photo pops up in a table. Yes, the program doesn't work with Rootsweb, so resides on a server which you access by a link. Part two, I'll let the program writer explain the rest. Don, What I have been doing for Arizona and Colorado is this: I set up the project at no charge. I charge $12.95/month for hosting. This includes the first 200MB- and additiona
23. Re: [USGenWeb-SW] USGenWeb archives [1]
Don, give us a link to somewhere using GPP and we can better answer it. -- ~~ Jeffery G. Scism. IBSSG Genealogy is the art convincing public officials that you need to have a document to determine IF you are a descendant, and if you had Proof of descendancy, you wouldn't NEED the document.
24. Re: [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 14C [1]
> It has been moved and seconded that the proposed revisions be returned to > committee and work on the revision be completed as soon as possible by > special election, but no less than 60 days before 2005 election cycle. > > Please vote YES if in favor, NO if opposed. Members will have until 7:45AM > MST, Friday, June 11 to cast their ballots. Any preference on which way to vote on this? Bettie <><
25. RE: [USGenWeb-SW] [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 04-14 [1]
Um, Motion 04-14 was about the GA situation.... Motion 04-13B regards the proposed revisions and is still on the table. Jana -----Original Message----- From: bookstorelady [mailto:bookstorelady@prodigy.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 12:38 PM To: USGENWEB-SW-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [USGenWeb-SW] [BOARD-L] VOTE Motion 04-14 I personally dislike the current by-laws... I also support the works of the by-law committee I thought the motion to return the by-laws to committee for work and state s
Viewing 1-25 of 202 matches from 36,110,418 documents1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next

CPU seconds used 0.499924