ACADIAN-CAJUN-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: CASSE/PILOIS m 1665
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 21:40:52 -0400

Hi Paul,

According to Jette the name is Pilois or Pilie. Since Pilois is first, I
would use that name and place Pilie in the notes as an alternate
spelling.

Remember that at that time many did not know how to read and write so
names
were often recorded as they sounded by a notary or priest.

Ray

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:08:05 -0700 Paul Nichols <>
writes:
> Hello.
>
> I have Antoine Casse m to Francoise De Pitié 14 Oct, 1665 in
> Château-Richer, Montmorency, Québec, Canada. They are the
> parents of, among others, Charlotte Casse who m Denis Nadeau
> 9 Nov, 1695 in Beaumont, Bellechasse, Québec, Canada.
>
> My question is this: I have seen Antoine's Casse's wifes family
> name as both PILOIS and De Pitié.
>
> Which of them is correct?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Paul of San Diego
>
>
>
> ==== ACADIAN-CAJUN Mailing List ====
> Guidelines of this Mailing List, including details on how to
> UNSUBSCRIBE or change to Digest (or List) Mode, visit:
> http://www.acadian.org/rootsweb.html
>
>


Ray Roux
Mexico, NY

This thread:

• CASSE/PILOIS m 1665 by Paul Nichols <>

  • Re: CASSE/PILOIS m 1665 by