ACADIAN-FRENCH-CANADIAN-L Archives

Archiver > ACADIAN-FRENCH-CANADIAN > 2009-03 > 1235958322


From: <>
Subject: Re: [AFC] AFC Database - surname Bertrand
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:45:22 -0500
References: <897143.77965.qm@web110804.mail.gq1.yahoo.com><6DD2BA56A2644539A9B5D03F93B05D85@veltonPC><7402F7A009114922B4E98D0F704D6EAB@veltonPC><001f01c99ac0$d6170140$ae812a4b@ed><000501c99acd$98744660$c95cd320$@net>
In-Reply-To: <000501c99acd$98744660$c95cd320$@net>


Hi All,

I have discovered in DGFA-1 there are many times couples and/or individuals,
that end with that entry. Just because someone is designated # 2, that does
not mean # 1 was the parent.

Ask Lucie, bye m

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Scott" <>
To: "'Ed Dillon'" <>; "'Velton'" <>;
<>; <>
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [AFC] AFC Database - surname Bertrand


> Hi Ed,
>
> I have checked the DGFA-1, pp 134 - 140 and the numbers are a little
> confusing. White shows Clement & Huguette Lambelotas #1, no issue; then he
> shows Jean-Francois BERTRAND & Ozanne [Marie-Anne] Chevros as #2, however,
> there are no parents given for Jean Francois, 6 issue; #3 is Francois
> BERTRAND [Jean Francois & Ozanne], 7 issue; the on p. 138 is found #4
> Claude
> BERTRAND & Catherine PITRE. There are no parents listed for Claude, 10
> issue..
>
> I do not have an BERTRANDS in my lines but I find this interesting. There
> may be something in the corrections, but to be honest I have a hard time
> interpreting these...
>
> Andy
>
> "

This thread: