ADVANCED-RESEARCH-L Archives

Archiver > ADVANCED-RESEARCH > 2009-06 > 1246313849


From: "Fredric Z. Saunders" <>
Subject: Re: [ADVANRES] Understanding Elias James' Deed of Gift
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:17:29 -0600
References: <f55f8a5a0906280437m431ba5dax24c473135d298c73@mail.gmail.com><A3ED45FE7CB9427780B98350909CCAB4@Ralphs><3D2A5C352F7E4475B1F32E15CE7B919D@bdf5474e5><92625DB3A4AF4E15A4C6FEFE26D109DD@Ralphs>
In-Reply-To: <92625DB3A4AF4E15A4C6FEFE26D109DD@Ralphs>


Please either use e-mails or full names as I am Rick also who responded to
RickandRana [].

Ralph Taylor [] stated:
>but the information which Rick gave about Celia ROGERS'
>age at the time of the gift is evidence against them.....
>The information: Celia ROGERS was a newborn infant at the
>time of the gift from Elias JAMES, 12 days old -- not
>12 years or 12 months, but days. Her mother's name was
>given as Elizabeth JAMES.

Reread the original where RickandRana [] stated:
>Apparently, Celia ROGERS is a minor as Hannah, who is
>twelve days old, will not be given to Celia until Celia
>"comes of age".

It is the Negro girl Hannah who is 12 days old, not the daughter Celia
ROGERS. Celia ROGERS is just stated to be a minor.

This completely changes your {Ralph Taylor []} whole
arguments you followed with.

Rick Saunders

This thread: