ALT-GENEALOGY-L Archives
Archiver > ALT-GENEALOGY > 2002-04 > 1019156621
From: Singhals <>
Subject: Re: 1930 census
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:03:57 -0400
References: <3CBDE0E3.B4F0CA9F@earthlink.net>, <a9kqdg$gtm$1@bob.news.rcn.net>, <v18sbuc139p8na1oe9l1pthg0tdvbt7ast@4ax.com>
Dexter Kenfield wrote:
> In an earlier posting on their site, Ancestry said their plan was to
> get all images online in three or four months, and a complete index by
> year-end (i.e. nine months from release). I, for one, will be
> impressed if they come anywhere close. Compare the British 1901
> effort. Let's hope the indexing is good.
I'd imagine that's one of the reasons Ancestry is putting
things up in bits and pieces -- to spread the load around.
Maybe Q*Q should consider that? (g)
Cheryl
This thread:
| Re: 1930 census by Singhals <> |