APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 1999-12 > 0944434767


From: "mavrogeorge" <>
Subject: RE: [APG] Data CDs
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 14:59:27 -0800


I missed Mills original post - which you quoted from - so my
comment may be way off base. The organization would be
approving whatever
the organization thought was important. It can be our
(meaning APG) "approving" organization so the rules are
ours. How do we review
printed material now? That would be a start.

- accuracy of the data
- completeness of the data
- presentation of the data

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Bamford [mailto:]
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 1999 1:27 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [APG] Data CDs
>
>
> At 02:31 PM 12/5/1999 -0600, Mills wrote:
> >
> >Jan, what exactly would APG or NGS be approving?
> What standards would be
> >set? Would we approve the reliability of a
> publisher's advertising--in print
> >or on its website? The thoroughness with which
> the company has described its
> >product in its preface to the content? The
> thoroughness or accuracy of the... snip>

This thread: