APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2001-04 > 0987823182


From: "Brenda Dougall Merriman, CGRS, CGL" <>
Subject: Re: [APG] PC Genealogy
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 23:19:42 -0400
References: <C12E389DBC0AD211A9D100805F6516EDC15B32@csc-nt-2.csc.cc.il.us.> <006501c0c948$b3f54d80$0300a8c0@gulfbreeze.mediacom.ispchannel.com> <007601c0c9cf$bccae280$7a500a3f@1pka7> <00ae01c0ca06$6053e7e0$0300a8c0@gulfbreeze.mediacom.ispchannel.com>


Robert V. Montague wrote:
>
> Fellow Professional Sexists: I was pleased that E.S. Mills weighed in on the use of PC language in genealogy, especially since she endorsed my basic premise . . . I want to add to her comment about the pluralness of 'their.'


In spite of some persuasive earlier arguments, you lost credibility with
me right there. The use of a non-word like "pluralness" screeches like
chalk on a blackboard. With respect, and a touch of humour, see
"plurality" in most dictionaries.


This thread: