APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2005-12 > 1133463738


From: "Marty Hiatt" <>
Subject: Transcribing names
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:02:18 -0500
References: <200511182158.jAILwedm016245@mail.rootsweb.com>


Dear Barbara,

I really appreciate your last sentence: "The objective, in transcription, is
to be faithful to the *intent* and *nature* of the original..." Let's
promote this without unnecessary square brackets.

I am not referring to obviously misspelled names, only interpretation of
script penmanship. When the name Reid was written as Read, it should be
transcribed as Read. There's no need to bracket Reid.

When Sterrett was written with a vowel I call an open e, it should be
transcribed as Sterrett, not Storrott [Sterrett].

But on the other hand, when someone wrote the surname Rust with too much
flourish on the capital R, so that it now appears as we would write B, the
initial letter was still an R. Therefore, the name was written as Rust, so
should be transcribed as Rust.

IMO,

Ms. Marty Hiatt, CGRS
"Document what you find, listen to what you are told, and especially, love
and respect your work." John Morris

CGRS is a service mark of the Board for Certification of Genealogists,
used under license after periodic evaluations by the Board.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barbara Robertson" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [APG] Correct way to transcribe names


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mills [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 1:58 PM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [APG] Correct way to transcribe names
>
>
> The University of Cambridge has an online course for English handwriting
> that genealogists may find interesting.
> http://www.english.cam.ac.uk/ceres/ehoc/
>
> Of course, this course serves students from a variety of disciplines where
> one might research original, handwritten manuscripts. The course has a
> broad
> range of original manuscripts from 1500-1700 with sample transcriptions.
> The
> authors of the course suggest that one include with a transcription a list
> of conventions used to represent the handwritten manuscript.
>
> This may be one way to clarify how the transcription represents the nature
> of the original manuscript, which Elizabeth so aptly suggests is the goal
> of
> an accurate transcription:
> <In broader terms, a typescript is never going to exactly replicate a
> document. Typed characters aren't even shaped the same in many cases. The
> objective, in transcription, is to be faithful to the *intent* and
> *nature*
> of the original, no?>
>
> Barbara Robertson
>
> ==== APG Mailing List ====
> The Association of Professional Genealogists
> http://www.apgen.org/publications/apg-l/index.html
>
> ______________________________

This thread: