APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2006-04 > 1144016444


From: "Mills" <>
Subject: RE: [APG] Clerk's copy -- original vs. derivative
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:20:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2c0.80893fb.3161a5bb@aol.com>


Rondina wrote:
>Elizabeth, you not only answered my questioned, but provided something much

more important -- your source -- the Federal Rules of Evidence. The copy I'm

printing should provide dull, but enlightening bedtime reading. I'm
surprised
that I was unaware of this publication. Thank you.


Yep. That's the rules of the game. We all have to provide our source--and it
should be the best source possible :).

Elizabeth





This thread: