APG-L ArchivesArchiver > APG > 2006-07 > 1153996123
From: "Barbara Zanzig" <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Certification vs. accreditation
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:28:43 -0700
References: <004e01c6b11d$b62ae430$2202a8c0@PEGGY> <200607270237.k6R2bkf4021920@mail.rootsweb.com>
Thank you for the history, but I'm still confused.
What is the difference between certification and accreditation? And how is
the distinction important, professionally and legally? Who are the different
constituencies they serve? You've explained who was involved in developing
the standards, but not what (or why) the differences are.
On 7/26/06, Mills <> wrote:
> For practical purposes, Peggy, it would appear to be a matter of
> For professional and legal purposes, the distinction is important.
|Re: [APG] Certification vs. accreditation by "Barbara Zanzig" <>|