APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2007-07 > 1184087786


From: "Paul Daniels" <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Why do genealogists disenfranchise themselves?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:16:26 -0600


Dear Everyone:

>From past experience, power and money are usually at the bottom of
this. Someone has played with the fund or wants to do something
he/she (or the current group of elected officials) knows will not be
approved of. The only way to do this is to get rid of anyone who
will complain or figure out what is really happening.

Jeanette

---- Original Message ----
From:
To:
Subject: Re: [APG] Why do genealogists disenfranchise themselves?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:50:27 -0400

>I believe NEHGS lost me when, at the annual meeting in 2003, they let
>allegations that a private detective had been employed to contact
>friends,
>neighbors, employees, employers, alma maters, I forget what else, of
>an
>opposition candidate, go unanswered. The Boston Globe reporter
>present filed
>a story that was never printed.
>
>I did not expect such things from NEHGS and I told every councilor I
>knew
>that. Some had the good grace to look embarrassed.
>
>I do not expect such things from the NYG&BS. I don't expect them to
>marginalize their distinguished journal, one of the oldest and most
>valuable
>in the country. I don't expect them to force the scholars in their
>number to
>go elsewhere. In this age of digitization, scholarship is really the
>only
>unique thing such institutions have to offer.
>
>In looking over the old list of Trustees at NYG&BS, I realize that I
>have
>dined with one officer and two Trustees, and consider two emeritus
>Trustees
>personal friends. Maybe they will have the good grace to look
>embarrassed,
>too.
>
>Melinde
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.
>
>-------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
>quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>



This thread: