APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2008-10 > 1222872941


From: "Richard A. Pence" <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Incorrect Information
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:55:41 -0400
References: <5.2.1.1.2.20080929231823.033629d0@mail.comcast.net><1863BCFCC09E4F3AAAB266D0F1878A00@YOUR58BA15CF1B><48E3690F.6060102@verizon.net>


"bob gillis" <> wrote:
> Richard A. Pence wrote:
>
> snip
>> The IGI, for example, is accepted by many as "gospel" even though most of
>> us known that the user-submitted portions of it are quite inaccurate.
>
> I think that would be better stated"....the user-submitted portions of
> it are *often* quite inaccurate."

Fair enough, although I have taken to adding an extra "warning" if I use any
user- submitted data from the IGI.

Richard


This thread: