APG-L ArchivesArchiver > APG > 2009-05 > 1242131820
From: Jeanette Daniels <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Genealogical Education
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 05:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
"The APG could be in the forefront of that. Yet 95-percent of the APG website appears to exist solely as a place to advertise the services of the members. Very little exists there to actually educate either the consumer or the struggling newcomer to the field."
Your email has actually stated some of Dee Dee's and others frustrations with APG. Dee Dee is proud of her CG but it does have limitations in the type of work that she does using her genealogical skills. Professions have certain criterion that make them professions and genealogy doesn't yet have those in place. Several are working to create what is necessary for that but there is still more that needs to be done for the professionalization of genealogy.
----- Original Message ----
From: Carolyne Gould <>
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:42:24 AM
Subject: Re: [APG] Genealogical Education
At 5:49 PM -0600 5/11/09, wrote:
>I sincerely do not mean this to sound flip? -? but then the future
>of the many is determined by the fears of the few??
>Dee Dee King, Certified Genealogist (sm), Certificate 903
>PO Box 1085
>Manvel? TX? 77578
>Forensic Genealogy Services is the Service Mark of Forensic
>Genealogy Services, LLC.? ? ? Certified Genealogist (CG) is a
>service mark (sm) of the board for Certification of Genealogists?
>conferred to associates who consistently meet ethical and competency
>standards in accord with peer-reviewed evaluations every five years.
Dee and all,
I absolutely do not think that you (Dee) are trying to be "flip" with
your statement. I want to make that perfectly clear before I comment
on the last phrase in your sentence about "then the future of the
many is determined by the fears of the few?"
Isn't that exactly what you and some of the other people on this list
are trying to do? A few of you are trying to determine the future
of thousands of other people.
Step back from the conversation for a moment and try to look at your
posts with someone else's eyes.
One presumes the people on this list who have CG behind their names
are quite proud of obtaining their credentials. You should be. It
wasn't a walk in the park. It took hard work and one would presume
several years, and possibly decades, to accomplish. Yet it also
appears that some of the people who carry the designation are in some
way denigrating the same by asking for some other standard to
determine who is "allowed" to call themselves a professional
The truth is, one does not need any credentials to practice as a
professional genealogist. Everyone on this list knows it. The truth
is, genealogy is already a profession --- just ask the IRS. And the
truth is, no matter what credentials a person has --- or not --- or
what formal education or degree a person has -- or not -- it will not
guarantee that person will provide quality work for a client.
Surely, at one time or another, each of you have met a person with
the CG designation and wondered "how in the world did their work get
approved?" Surely, at one time or another, each of you have met a
person whose work was so exceptional, and so well documented, that
you didn't understand why they did not even try to become
The best way to distance one's self from the unscrupulous or poorly
qualified genealogist is to be the opposite! Let people see, through
your work, what quality genealogy really is.
As was quite rightly pointed out by Elizabeth Shown Mills, the BCG
and what is now ICAPGen have done an excellent job since 1964 of
setting the standards for genealogy research. Professional
genealogists should be encouraging newcomers to the field to learn
and follow those standards. The APG could be in the forefront of
that. Yet 95-percent of the APG website appears to exist solely as a
place to advertise the services of the members. Very little exists
there to actually educate either the consumer or the struggling
newcomer to the field.
I believe, good mentors, and good examples, will do more for the
future of genealogy (both amateur and professional) than an $18,000
degree in genealogy, or a "chair" at Harvard.
Be the change you want to see.
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|Re: [APG] Genealogical Education by Jeanette Daniels <>|