APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2009-06 > 1244131805

From: "LBoswell" <>
Subject: Re: [APG] History. was Favorite sources for timelines History
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:10:10 -0400
References: <4A25F444.1030706@integrity.com><7fc590ab0906040816q309ddb76x6e135fe520c4dc92@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7fc590ab0906040816q309ddb76x6e135fe520c4dc92@mail.gmail.com>

Same type of focus that is brought to proving genealogical connections
should be employed in creating the historical context. I've read some
excellent research summaries that cover the genealogical side of things
tightly, but then surround it all with unverifed historical 'facts' based on
internet-sourced time lines or local histories that aren't always accurate.
If the history side of things is not verified, do you tell the client that?
Or if you're using second hand material, ditto?


This thread: