AUS-NSW-SE-L Archives

Archiver > AUS-NSW-SE > 2001-05 > 0990853977


From: "LF" <>
Subject: Re: A query re legitimacy
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 15:12:57 +1000
References: <000501c0e500$847fc2a0$6576a6cb@bmr.bmr.net.au>


I wouldn't think so, no! If a child is born out of wedlock, then they are
born out of wedlock, so I would assume that the child is illegitimate and
illegitimate to stay.
However, if anyone can inform otherwise, I would be very interested to know
about the issue.

Lavinia
NSW, Australia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gwen Redman" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:53 PM
Subject: A query re legitimacy


> I was hoping that someone would know the answer to this query:
> If a child, born in 1893, is illegitimate, and if the child's mother
> married her supposed father in 1896, would that make her birth legitimate
?
> Thanks,
> Gwen
>
>
> ==============================
> Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com!
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp
>

This thread: