AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-L Archives

From: "Di Randell" <>
Subject: Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY KIRBY KIRBEY Sunbury Geelong
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:44:50 +1000
References: <001001c7e863$48b5d170$6400a8c0@DI><005a01c7e866$6ebd0ca0$33b3dccb@homeoffice><002501c7e867$76b44670$6400a8c0@DI><02e301c7e879$85ac0ac0$0401a8c0@sz>

it's definitely Sunbury based on the
> other entries for children of Michael and Bridget ......
>
> >
> >> > I'm interested in a James KERLEY born Sbury, Victoria 1866, son of
> >> > Michael


Thanks for your input, Adelina, Bill, John & Susie

I tracked down the marriage of my couple, Michael KERLEY and Bridget KERBY, and then Michael goes by the name KERBY!

No place given for marriage so that's no help.

I guess in the 1860s Geelong and Sunbury would have been considered a long way apart.

I think I'll give Michael KERLEY/KERBY and Bridget a miss for the time being and concentrate on the KERLEYs who were definitely at Geelong: I have plenty to sort out with them.

Thanks again

Di
Brisbane

This thread:

• [GEELONG] KERLEY Sbury Victoria by "Di Randell" <>
  • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY Sbury Victoria by "Bill Willett" <>
    • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY Sbury Sunbury by "Di Randell" <>
      • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY Sbury Sunbury by "Susie Zada" <>
        • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY Sbury Sunbury by "John Whitehand" <>
      • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY Sbury Sunbury by "Susie Zada" <>

        • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY KIRBY KIRBEY Sunbury Geelong by "Di Randell" <>

          • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY KIRBY KIRBEY Sunbury Geelong by "Susie Zada" <>
            • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY KERBY KIRLEY transcription by "Di Randell" <>
              • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY Joseph of Geelong Correcti0n to earlier post by "Di Randell" <>
  • Re: [GEELONG] KERLEY Sbury Victoria by "" <>