AUS-VIC-WESTERN-DISTRICT-L Archives

Archiver > AUS-VIC-WESTERN-DISTRICT > 2002-09 > 1031391201


From: "Beryl OGorman" <>
Subject: [AUS-VIC-West] Fw: review of Archives@Victoria website
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 19:33:21 +1000


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rachel U'Ren" <Rachel.U'>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 6:02 PM
Subject: review of website


> Dear list administrator,
> Many of your subscribers are likely to be users of the online catalogue of
> Public Record Office Victoria and might like to participate in our survey.
> Could you please forward the message below to your list.
> thanks
> ***
>
> (apologies for cross-posting)
>
> Dear colleagues,
> Many of you will have visited , the new online gateway to
> the archives of the State of Victoria. As part of the ongoing management
> of , Public Record Office Victoria is conducting a
> post-implementation review. We would welcome any feedback and comments
> from users of the site.
>
> If you would like to contribute to the review, please complete the brief
> survey below and email (or fax) responses to me by Friday 20 September.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rachel U'Ren
> Public Record Office Victoria
> Tel: +61 3 9285 7955
> Fax: +61 3 9285 7953
> E-mail:
>
>
> Searching
> 1 - Which search method do you use most frequently and why?
> 2 - Do you often use the same group of records, and if so, are you able to
> get to/locate that group quickly?
> 3 - Once you have done a search, do you find it easy to locate the records
> you need within your search results?
>
> Ordering
> 4 - Currently the ordering process allows you to put records into a
> 'shopping cart' (Current Request) before finalising your order. Do you
> need the opportunity to review your request before submitting it to PROV?
> 5 - How many records do you usually have on order at any one time?
>
> Navigation and information
> 6 - Are you able to find your way around the site easily?
> 7 - Is there enough information to help you use ? If
not,
> what sort of information do you require?
>
> Any other comments?
>

This thread: