BK-L Archives

Archiver > BK > 1999-05 > 0925845001


From: "D. Patnode" <>
Subject: Re: [BK-L] No Issue
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 14:10:01 -0500 (CDT)


>From: "Brenda Kendall" <>
>Subject: RE: [BK-L] No Issue
>Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 19:07:17 +0800
>
>Hi MWilson, All I do is write this in the notes for the person but perhaps
>your suggestion would show it more obviously in reports. What do other
>people do??

I put a notation in one of the message lines for either or both parents so
the information appears when I run reports.

Dan Patnode

Researching the following variations on a theme: PATENAUDE, PATNAUDE,
PATNOUDE, PATENOUDE, PATENODE, PATNODE, PATNOD, PATNOED, PATNOE, PATENOE,
PATNO, PATNUDE, PATNOTE, PATNOTTE, PEDNU, etc. throughout Wisconsin,
Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, and all the Midwest.

As well as: JONES (In Marathon County), MITICOMINKWE, MITICOMINQUI,
FREIBURGER (in Washington County), and HAUG (in Milwaukee County).

>-----Original Message-----
>From:M. B. Wilson [mailto:]
>Sent:Tuesday, 4 May 1999 21:45
>To:
>Subject:[BK-L] No Issue
>
>Hello, All,
>
>Does anyone have any ideas about how to indicate that a couple did not have
>any children other than issuing them a "child" called "no issue?" It makes
>it so much easier in your "hunt" not to be searching for children who don't
>exist. I think it makes it especially nice when viewing a report to have
>indicated "no issue."
>
>MWilson
>Florida
>
>
>

This thread: